Cargando…

Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy

The current emphasis on obstetric risk management helps to frame gestational weight gain as problematic and encourages intervention by healthcare professionals. However pregnant women have reported confusion, distrust, and negative effects associated with antenatal weight management interactions. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swift, J. A., Pearce, J., Jethwa, P. H., Taylor, M. A., Avery, A., Ellis, S., Langley-Evans, S. C., McMullen, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8454759
_version_ 1782465713227694080
author Swift, J. A.
Pearce, J.
Jethwa, P. H.
Taylor, M. A.
Avery, A.
Ellis, S.
Langley-Evans, S. C.
McMullen, S.
author_facet Swift, J. A.
Pearce, J.
Jethwa, P. H.
Taylor, M. A.
Avery, A.
Ellis, S.
Langley-Evans, S. C.
McMullen, S.
author_sort Swift, J. A.
collection PubMed
description The current emphasis on obstetric risk management helps to frame gestational weight gain as problematic and encourages intervention by healthcare professionals. However pregnant women have reported confusion, distrust, and negative effects associated with antenatal weight management interactions. The MAGIC study (MAnaging weiGht In pregnanCy) sought to examine women's self-reported experiences of usual-care antenatal weight management in early pregnancy and consider these alongside weight monitoring behaviours and future expectations. 193 women (18 yrs+) were recruited from routine antenatal clinics at the Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust. Self-reported gestation was 10–27 weeks, with 41.5% (n = 80) between 12 and 14 and 43.0% (n = 83) between 20 and 22 weeks. At recruitment 50.3% of participants (n = 97) could be classified as overweight or obese. 69.4% of highest weight women (≥30 kg/m(2)) did not report receiving advice about weight, although they were significantly more likely compared to women with BMI < 30 kg/m(2). The majority of women (regardless of BMI) did not express any barriers to being weighed and 40.8% reported weighing themselves at home. Women across the BMI categories expressed a desire for more engagement from healthcare professionals on the issue of bodyweight. Women are clearly not being served appropriately in the current situation which simultaneously problematizes and fails to offer constructive dialogue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50980862016-11-14 Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy Swift, J. A. Pearce, J. Jethwa, P. H. Taylor, M. A. Avery, A. Ellis, S. Langley-Evans, S. C. McMullen, S. J Pregnancy Research Article The current emphasis on obstetric risk management helps to frame gestational weight gain as problematic and encourages intervention by healthcare professionals. However pregnant women have reported confusion, distrust, and negative effects associated with antenatal weight management interactions. The MAGIC study (MAnaging weiGht In pregnanCy) sought to examine women's self-reported experiences of usual-care antenatal weight management in early pregnancy and consider these alongside weight monitoring behaviours and future expectations. 193 women (18 yrs+) were recruited from routine antenatal clinics at the Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust. Self-reported gestation was 10–27 weeks, with 41.5% (n = 80) between 12 and 14 and 43.0% (n = 83) between 20 and 22 weeks. At recruitment 50.3% of participants (n = 97) could be classified as overweight or obese. 69.4% of highest weight women (≥30 kg/m(2)) did not report receiving advice about weight, although they were significantly more likely compared to women with BMI < 30 kg/m(2). The majority of women (regardless of BMI) did not express any barriers to being weighed and 40.8% reported weighing themselves at home. Women across the BMI categories expressed a desire for more engagement from healthcare professionals on the issue of bodyweight. Women are clearly not being served appropriately in the current situation which simultaneously problematizes and fails to offer constructive dialogue. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5098086/ /pubmed/27843648 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8454759 Text en Copyright © 2016 J. A. Swift et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Swift, J. A.
Pearce, J.
Jethwa, P. H.
Taylor, M. A.
Avery, A.
Ellis, S.
Langley-Evans, S. C.
McMullen, S.
Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy
title Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy
title_full Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy
title_fullStr Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy
title_full_unstemmed Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy
title_short Antenatal Weight Management: Women's Experiences, Behaviours, and Expectations of Weighing in Early Pregnancy
title_sort antenatal weight management: women's experiences, behaviours, and expectations of weighing in early pregnancy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843648
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8454759
work_keys_str_mv AT swiftja antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT pearcej antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT jethwaph antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT taylorma antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT averya antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT elliss antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT langleyevanssc antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy
AT mcmullens antenatalweightmanagementwomensexperiencesbehavioursandexpectationsofweighinginearlypregnancy