Cargando…

Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm

Matrotrophy, the continuous extra‐vitelline supply of nutrients from the parent to the progeny during gestation, is one of the masterpieces of nature, contributing to offspring fitness and often correlated with evolutionary diversification. The most elaborate form of matrotrophy—placentotrophy—is we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ostrovsky, Andrew N., Lidgard, Scott, Gordon, Dennis P., Schwaha, Thomas, Genikhovich, Grigory, Ereskovsky, Alexander V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12189
_version_ 1782465733254447104
author Ostrovsky, Andrew N.
Lidgard, Scott
Gordon, Dennis P.
Schwaha, Thomas
Genikhovich, Grigory
Ereskovsky, Alexander V.
author_facet Ostrovsky, Andrew N.
Lidgard, Scott
Gordon, Dennis P.
Schwaha, Thomas
Genikhovich, Grigory
Ereskovsky, Alexander V.
author_sort Ostrovsky, Andrew N.
collection PubMed
description Matrotrophy, the continuous extra‐vitelline supply of nutrients from the parent to the progeny during gestation, is one of the masterpieces of nature, contributing to offspring fitness and often correlated with evolutionary diversification. The most elaborate form of matrotrophy—placentotrophy—is well known for its broad occurrence among vertebrates, but the comparative distribution and structural diversity of matrotrophic expression among invertebrates is wanting. In the first comprehensive analysis of matrotrophy across the animal kingdom, we report that regardless of the degree of expression, it is established or inferred in at least 21 of 34 animal phyla, significantly exceeding previous accounts and changing the old paradigm that these phenomena are infrequent among invertebrates. In 10 phyla, matrotrophy is represented by only one or a few species, whereas in 11 it is either not uncommon or widespread and even pervasive. Among invertebrate phyla, Platyhelminthes, Arthropoda and Bryozoa dominate, with 162, 83 and 53 partly or wholly matrotrophic families, respectively. In comparison, Chordata has more than 220 families that include or consist entirely of matrotrophic species. We analysed the distribution of reproductive patterns among and within invertebrate phyla using recently published molecular phylogenies: matrotrophy has seemingly evolved at least 140 times in all major superclades: Parazoa and Eumetazoa, Radiata and Bilateria, Protostomia and Deuterostomia, Lophotrochozoa and Ecdysozoa. In Cycliophora and some Digenea, it may have evolved twice in the same life cycle. The provisioning of developing young is associated with almost all known types of incubation chambers, with matrotrophic viviparity more widespread (20 phyla) than brooding (10 phyla). In nine phyla, both matrotrophic incubation types are present. Matrotrophy is expressed in five nutritive modes, of which histotrophy and placentotrophy are most prevalent. Oophagy, embryophagy and histophagy are rarer, plausibly evolving through heterochronous development of the embryonic mouthparts and digestive system. During gestation, matrotrophic modes can shift, intergrade, and be performed simultaneously. Invertebrate matrotrophic adaptations are less complex structurally than in chordates, but they are more diverse, being formed either by a parent, embryo, or both. In a broad and still preliminary sense, there are indications of trends or grades of evolutionarily increasing complexity of nutritive structures: formation of (i) local zones of enhanced nutritional transport (placental analogues), including specialized parent–offspring cell complexes and various appendages increasing the entire secreting and absorbing surfaces as well as the contact surface between embryo and parent, (ii) compartmentalization of the common incubatory space into more compact and ‘isolated’ chambers with presumably more effective nutritional relationships, and (iii) internal secretory (‘milk’) glands. Some placental analogues in onychophorans and arthropods mimic the simplest placental variants in vertebrates, comprising striking examples of convergent evolution acting at all levels—positional, structural and physiological.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50981762016-11-09 Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm Ostrovsky, Andrew N. Lidgard, Scott Gordon, Dennis P. Schwaha, Thomas Genikhovich, Grigory Ereskovsky, Alexander V. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc Original Articles Matrotrophy, the continuous extra‐vitelline supply of nutrients from the parent to the progeny during gestation, is one of the masterpieces of nature, contributing to offspring fitness and often correlated with evolutionary diversification. The most elaborate form of matrotrophy—placentotrophy—is well known for its broad occurrence among vertebrates, but the comparative distribution and structural diversity of matrotrophic expression among invertebrates is wanting. In the first comprehensive analysis of matrotrophy across the animal kingdom, we report that regardless of the degree of expression, it is established or inferred in at least 21 of 34 animal phyla, significantly exceeding previous accounts and changing the old paradigm that these phenomena are infrequent among invertebrates. In 10 phyla, matrotrophy is represented by only one or a few species, whereas in 11 it is either not uncommon or widespread and even pervasive. Among invertebrate phyla, Platyhelminthes, Arthropoda and Bryozoa dominate, with 162, 83 and 53 partly or wholly matrotrophic families, respectively. In comparison, Chordata has more than 220 families that include or consist entirely of matrotrophic species. We analysed the distribution of reproductive patterns among and within invertebrate phyla using recently published molecular phylogenies: matrotrophy has seemingly evolved at least 140 times in all major superclades: Parazoa and Eumetazoa, Radiata and Bilateria, Protostomia and Deuterostomia, Lophotrochozoa and Ecdysozoa. In Cycliophora and some Digenea, it may have evolved twice in the same life cycle. The provisioning of developing young is associated with almost all known types of incubation chambers, with matrotrophic viviparity more widespread (20 phyla) than brooding (10 phyla). In nine phyla, both matrotrophic incubation types are present. Matrotrophy is expressed in five nutritive modes, of which histotrophy and placentotrophy are most prevalent. Oophagy, embryophagy and histophagy are rarer, plausibly evolving through heterochronous development of the embryonic mouthparts and digestive system. During gestation, matrotrophic modes can shift, intergrade, and be performed simultaneously. Invertebrate matrotrophic adaptations are less complex structurally than in chordates, but they are more diverse, being formed either by a parent, embryo, or both. In a broad and still preliminary sense, there are indications of trends or grades of evolutionarily increasing complexity of nutritive structures: formation of (i) local zones of enhanced nutritional transport (placental analogues), including specialized parent–offspring cell complexes and various appendages increasing the entire secreting and absorbing surfaces as well as the contact surface between embryo and parent, (ii) compartmentalization of the common incubatory space into more compact and ‘isolated’ chambers with presumably more effective nutritional relationships, and (iii) internal secretory (‘milk’) glands. Some placental analogues in onychophorans and arthropods mimic the simplest placental variants in vertebrates, comprising striking examples of convergent evolution acting at all levels—positional, structural and physiological. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2015-04-29 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5098176/ /pubmed/25925633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12189 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ostrovsky, Andrew N.
Lidgard, Scott
Gordon, Dennis P.
Schwaha, Thomas
Genikhovich, Grigory
Ereskovsky, Alexander V.
Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
title Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
title_full Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
title_fullStr Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
title_full_unstemmed Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
title_short Matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
title_sort matrotrophy and placentation in invertebrates: a new paradigm
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25925633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/brv.12189
work_keys_str_mv AT ostrovskyandrewn matrotrophyandplacentationininvertebratesanewparadigm
AT lidgardscott matrotrophyandplacentationininvertebratesanewparadigm
AT gordondennisp matrotrophyandplacentationininvertebratesanewparadigm
AT schwahathomas matrotrophyandplacentationininvertebratesanewparadigm
AT genikhovichgrigory matrotrophyandplacentationininvertebratesanewparadigm
AT ereskovskyalexanderv matrotrophyandplacentationininvertebratesanewparadigm