Cargando…

Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs

Depotentiation (DP) is a mechanism by which synapses that have recently undergone long-term potentiation (LTP) can reverse their synaptic strengthening within a short time-window after LTP induction. Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) were shown to be involved in different forms of LT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Latif-Hernandez, Amira, Faldini, Enrico, Ahmed, Tariq, Balschun, Detlef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00252
_version_ 1782465777356505088
author Latif-Hernandez, Amira
Faldini, Enrico
Ahmed, Tariq
Balschun, Detlef
author_facet Latif-Hernandez, Amira
Faldini, Enrico
Ahmed, Tariq
Balschun, Detlef
author_sort Latif-Hernandez, Amira
collection PubMed
description Depotentiation (DP) is a mechanism by which synapses that have recently undergone long-term potentiation (LTP) can reverse their synaptic strengthening within a short time-window after LTP induction. Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) were shown to be involved in different forms of LTP and long-term depression (LTD), but little is known about their roles in DP. Here, we generated DP by applying low-frequency stimulation (LFS) at 5 Hz after LTP had been induced by a single train of theta-burst-stimulation (TBS). While application of LFS for 2 min (DP2′) generated only a short-lasting DP that was independent of the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and group 1 mGluRs, LFS given for 8 min (DP8′) induced a robust DP that was maintained for at least 2 h. This strong form of DP was contingent on NMDAR activation. Interestingly, DP8′ appears to include a metabotropic NMDAR function because it was blocked by the competitive NMDAR antagonist D-AP5 but not by the use-dependent inhibitor MK-801 or high Mg(2+). Furthermore, DP8′ was enhanced by application of the mGluR1 antagonist (YM 298198, 1 μM). The mGluR5 antagonist 2-Methyl-6(phenylethynyl) pyridine (MPEP, 40 μM), in contrast, failed to affect it. The induction of LTP, in turn, was NMDAR dependent (as tested with D-AP5), and blocked by MPEP but not by YM 298198. These results indicate a functional dissociation of mGluR1 and mGluR5 in two related and consecutively induced types of NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity (LTP → DP) with far-reaching consequences for their role in plasticity and learning under normal and pathological conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50983922016-11-21 Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs Latif-Hernandez, Amira Faldini, Enrico Ahmed, Tariq Balschun, Detlef Front Cell Neurosci Neuroscience Depotentiation (DP) is a mechanism by which synapses that have recently undergone long-term potentiation (LTP) can reverse their synaptic strengthening within a short time-window after LTP induction. Group 1 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) were shown to be involved in different forms of LTP and long-term depression (LTD), but little is known about their roles in DP. Here, we generated DP by applying low-frequency stimulation (LFS) at 5 Hz after LTP had been induced by a single train of theta-burst-stimulation (TBS). While application of LFS for 2 min (DP2′) generated only a short-lasting DP that was independent of the activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) and group 1 mGluRs, LFS given for 8 min (DP8′) induced a robust DP that was maintained for at least 2 h. This strong form of DP was contingent on NMDAR activation. Interestingly, DP8′ appears to include a metabotropic NMDAR function because it was blocked by the competitive NMDAR antagonist D-AP5 but not by the use-dependent inhibitor MK-801 or high Mg(2+). Furthermore, DP8′ was enhanced by application of the mGluR1 antagonist (YM 298198, 1 μM). The mGluR5 antagonist 2-Methyl-6(phenylethynyl) pyridine (MPEP, 40 μM), in contrast, failed to affect it. The induction of LTP, in turn, was NMDAR dependent (as tested with D-AP5), and blocked by MPEP but not by YM 298198. These results indicate a functional dissociation of mGluR1 and mGluR5 in two related and consecutively induced types of NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity (LTP → DP) with far-reaching consequences for their role in plasticity and learning under normal and pathological conditions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5098392/ /pubmed/27872582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00252 Text en Copyright © 2016 Latif-Hernandez, Faldini, Ahmed and Balschun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Latif-Hernandez, Amira
Faldini, Enrico
Ahmed, Tariq
Balschun, Detlef
Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs
title Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs
title_full Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs
title_fullStr Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs
title_full_unstemmed Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs
title_short Separate Ionotropic and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Functions in Depotentiation vs. LTP: A Distinct Role for Group1 mGluR Subtypes and NMDARs
title_sort separate ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate receptor functions in depotentiation vs. ltp: a distinct role for group1 mglur subtypes and nmdars
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00252
work_keys_str_mv AT latifhernandezamira separateionotropicandmetabotropicglutamatereceptorfunctionsindepotentiationvsltpadistinctroleforgroup1mglursubtypesandnmdars
AT faldinienrico separateionotropicandmetabotropicglutamatereceptorfunctionsindepotentiationvsltpadistinctroleforgroup1mglursubtypesandnmdars
AT ahmedtariq separateionotropicandmetabotropicglutamatereceptorfunctionsindepotentiationvsltpadistinctroleforgroup1mglursubtypesandnmdars
AT balschundetlef separateionotropicandmetabotropicglutamatereceptorfunctionsindepotentiationvsltpadistinctroleforgroup1mglursubtypesandnmdars