Cargando…

The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew

PURPOSE: Surveys of patients’ experiences typically show results that are indicative of positive experiences. Unbalanced response scales have reduced positive skew for responses to items within the Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire (UPC-Q). The objective of this study was to compare the u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bjertnaes, Oyvind, Iversen, Hilde Hestad, Garratt, Andrew M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843304
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S116424
_version_ 1782465802038935552
author Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Garratt, Andrew M
author_facet Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Garratt, Andrew M
author_sort Bjertnaes, Oyvind
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Surveys of patients’ experiences typically show results that are indicative of positive experiences. Unbalanced response scales have reduced positive skew for responses to items within the Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire (UPC-Q). The objective of this study was to compare the unbalanced response scale with another unbalanced approach to scaling to assess whether the positive skew might be further reduced. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The UPC-Q was included in a patient experience survey conducted at the ward level at six hospitals in Norway in 2015. The postal survey included two reminders to nonrespondents. For patients in the first month of inclusion, UPC-Q items had standard scaling: poor, fairly good, good, very good, and excellent. For patients in the second month, the scaling was more positive: poor, good, very good, exceptionally good, and excellent. The effect of scaling on UPC-Q scores was tested with independent samples t-tests and multilevel linear regression analysis, the latter controlling for the hierarchical structure of data and known predictors of patient-reported experiences. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.6% (n=4,970). Significantly lower scores were found for all items of the more positively worded scale: UPC-Q total score difference was 7.9 (P<0.001), on a scale from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best possible score. Differences between the four items of the UPC-Q ranged from 7.1 (P<0.001) to 10.4 (P<0.001). Multivariate multilevel regression analysis confirmed the difference between the response groups, after controlling for other background variables; UPC-Q total score difference estimate was 8.3 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The more positively worded scaling significantly lowered the mean scores, potentially increasing the sensitivity of the UPC-Q to identify differences over time and between providers. However, none of the groups exhibited large positive skew and ceiling effects, implying that such effects might not be a big measurement problem for either scaling format. We recommend using the standard scaling in surveys producing external indicators for inter-provider comparisons. The more positively worded scaling has greater relevance for local measurement work where the results of patient experience surveys have shown large positive skew, and intra-provider comparison is the primary goal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50985482016-11-14 The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew Bjertnaes, Oyvind Iversen, Hilde Hestad Garratt, Andrew M Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research PURPOSE: Surveys of patients’ experiences typically show results that are indicative of positive experiences. Unbalanced response scales have reduced positive skew for responses to items within the Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire (UPC-Q). The objective of this study was to compare the unbalanced response scale with another unbalanced approach to scaling to assess whether the positive skew might be further reduced. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The UPC-Q was included in a patient experience survey conducted at the ward level at six hospitals in Norway in 2015. The postal survey included two reminders to nonrespondents. For patients in the first month of inclusion, UPC-Q items had standard scaling: poor, fairly good, good, very good, and excellent. For patients in the second month, the scaling was more positive: poor, good, very good, exceptionally good, and excellent. The effect of scaling on UPC-Q scores was tested with independent samples t-tests and multilevel linear regression analysis, the latter controlling for the hierarchical structure of data and known predictors of patient-reported experiences. RESULTS: The response rate was 54.6% (n=4,970). Significantly lower scores were found for all items of the more positively worded scale: UPC-Q total score difference was 7.9 (P<0.001), on a scale from 0 to 100 where 100 is the best possible score. Differences between the four items of the UPC-Q ranged from 7.1 (P<0.001) to 10.4 (P<0.001). Multivariate multilevel regression analysis confirmed the difference between the response groups, after controlling for other background variables; UPC-Q total score difference estimate was 8.3 (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The more positively worded scaling significantly lowered the mean scores, potentially increasing the sensitivity of the UPC-Q to identify differences over time and between providers. However, none of the groups exhibited large positive skew and ceiling effects, implying that such effects might not be a big measurement problem for either scaling format. We recommend using the standard scaling in surveys producing external indicators for inter-provider comparisons. The more positively worded scaling has greater relevance for local measurement work where the results of patient experience surveys have shown large positive skew, and intra-provider comparison is the primary goal. Dove Medical Press 2016-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5098548/ /pubmed/27843304 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S116424 Text en © 2016 Bjertnaes et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bjertnaes, Oyvind
Iversen, Hilde Hestad
Garratt, Andrew M
The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
title The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
title_full The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
title_fullStr The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
title_full_unstemmed The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
title_short The Universal Patient Centeredness Questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
title_sort universal patient centeredness questionnaire: scaling approaches to reduce positive skew
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843304
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S116424
work_keys_str_mv AT bjertnaesoyvind theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairescalingapproachestoreducepositiveskew
AT iversenhildehestad theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairescalingapproachestoreducepositiveskew
AT garrattandrewm theuniversalpatientcenterednessquestionnairescalingapproachestoreducepositiveskew
AT bjertnaesoyvind universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairescalingapproachestoreducepositiveskew
AT iversenhildehestad universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairescalingapproachestoreducepositiveskew
AT garrattandrewm universalpatientcenterednessquestionnairescalingapproachestoreducepositiveskew