Cargando…

Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach

BACKGROUND: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used in second-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are administered parenterally. However, so-called targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) – developed more recently – offer alternative (ie, oral) administration forms in se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alten, Rieke, Krüger, Klaus, Rellecke, Julian, Schiffner-Rohe, Julia, Behmer, Olaf, Schiffhorst, Guido, Nolting, Hans-Dieter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843301
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S117774
_version_ 1782465802955390976
author Alten, Rieke
Krüger, Klaus
Rellecke, Julian
Schiffner-Rohe, Julia
Behmer, Olaf
Schiffhorst, Guido
Nolting, Hans-Dieter
author_facet Alten, Rieke
Krüger, Klaus
Rellecke, Julian
Schiffner-Rohe, Julia
Behmer, Olaf
Schiffhorst, Guido
Nolting, Hans-Dieter
author_sort Alten, Rieke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used in second-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are administered parenterally. However, so-called targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) – developed more recently – offer alternative (ie, oral) administration forms in second-line treatment. Since bDMARDs and tsDMARDs can be regarded as equal in terms of efficacy, the present study examines whether such characteristics as route of administration drive RA patients’ treatment choice. This may ultimately suggest superiority of some second-line DMARDs over equally effective options, at least according to RA-patient preferences. OBJECTIVE: The current study assessed the importance of oral administration among other treatment characteristics differing between available second-line DMARDs for RA patients’ preferences using a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DCE involved scenarios of three hypothetical treatment options in a d-efficient design with varying levels of key attributes (route and frequency of administration, time till onset of drug effect, combination therapy, possible side effects), as defined by focus groups. Further patient characteristics were recorded by an accompanying questionnaire. In the DCE, patients were asked to choose best and worst options (best–worst scaling). Results were analyzed by count analysis and adjusted regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,588 subjects completed the DCE and were eligible for final analyses. Across all characteristics included in the DCE, “oral administration” was most desired and “intravenous infusion” was most strongly rejected. This was followed by “no combination with methotrexate” being strongly preferred and “intake every 1–2 weeks” being strongly rejected. On average, levels of route of administration showed strongest influences on patients’ decisions in post hoc bootstrapping analysis. CONCLUSION: According to the results, an oral DMARD that does not have to be combined with methotrexate and is not administered (only) every 1–2 weeks appears a highly favorable treatment option for patients with RA. DMARDs meeting these preferences may increase compliance and adherence in RA treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50985632016-11-14 Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach Alten, Rieke Krüger, Klaus Rellecke, Julian Schiffner-Rohe, Julia Behmer, Olaf Schiffhorst, Guido Nolting, Hans-Dieter Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used in second-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are administered parenterally. However, so-called targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) – developed more recently – offer alternative (ie, oral) administration forms in second-line treatment. Since bDMARDs and tsDMARDs can be regarded as equal in terms of efficacy, the present study examines whether such characteristics as route of administration drive RA patients’ treatment choice. This may ultimately suggest superiority of some second-line DMARDs over equally effective options, at least according to RA-patient preferences. OBJECTIVE: The current study assessed the importance of oral administration among other treatment characteristics differing between available second-line DMARDs for RA patients’ preferences using a discrete-choice experiment (DCE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The DCE involved scenarios of three hypothetical treatment options in a d-efficient design with varying levels of key attributes (route and frequency of administration, time till onset of drug effect, combination therapy, possible side effects), as defined by focus groups. Further patient characteristics were recorded by an accompanying questionnaire. In the DCE, patients were asked to choose best and worst options (best–worst scaling). Results were analyzed by count analysis and adjusted regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,588 subjects completed the DCE and were eligible for final analyses. Across all characteristics included in the DCE, “oral administration” was most desired and “intravenous infusion” was most strongly rejected. This was followed by “no combination with methotrexate” being strongly preferred and “intake every 1–2 weeks” being strongly rejected. On average, levels of route of administration showed strongest influences on patients’ decisions in post hoc bootstrapping analysis. CONCLUSION: According to the results, an oral DMARD that does not have to be combined with methotrexate and is not administered (only) every 1–2 weeks appears a highly favorable treatment option for patients with RA. DMARDs meeting these preferences may increase compliance and adherence in RA treatment. Dove Medical Press 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5098563/ /pubmed/27843301 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S117774 Text en © 2016 Alten et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Alten, Rieke
Krüger, Klaus
Rellecke, Julian
Schiffner-Rohe, Julia
Behmer, Olaf
Schiffhorst, Guido
Nolting, Hans-Dieter
Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
title Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
title_full Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
title_fullStr Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
title_full_unstemmed Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
title_short Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
title_sort examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843301
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S117774
work_keys_str_mv AT altenrieke examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach
AT krugerklaus examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach
AT relleckejulian examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach
AT schiffnerrohejulia examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach
AT behmerolaf examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach
AT schiffhorstguido examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach
AT noltinghansdieter examiningpatientpreferencesinthetreatmentofrheumatoidarthritisusingadiscretechoiceapproach