Cargando…

Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation

Distal radius fractures account for nearly 1 of every 5 fractures in individuals aged 65 or older. Moreover, increased susceptibility to vertebral and hip fractures has been documented in patients a year after suffering a distal radius fracture. Although women are more susceptible to hip fractures,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikpeze, Tochukwu C., Smith, Heather C., Lee, Daniel J., Elfar, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458516669202
_version_ 1782465810129747968
author Ikpeze, Tochukwu C.
Smith, Heather C.
Lee, Daniel J.
Elfar, John C.
author_facet Ikpeze, Tochukwu C.
Smith, Heather C.
Lee, Daniel J.
Elfar, John C.
author_sort Ikpeze, Tochukwu C.
collection PubMed
description Distal radius fractures account for nearly 1 of every 5 fractures in individuals aged 65 or older. Moreover, increased susceptibility to vertebral and hip fractures has been documented in patients a year after suffering a distal radius fracture. Although women are more susceptible to hip fractures, men experience a higher mortality rate in the 7 years following a distal radius fracture. Traditional approaches to distal radius fractures have included both surgical and nonsurgical treatments, with predominant complaints involving weakness, stiffness, and pain. Nonsurgical approaches include immobilization with or without reduction, whereas surgical treatments include dorsal spanning bridge plates, percutaneous pinning, external fixation, and volar plate fixation. The nature of the fracture will determine the best treatment option, and surgeons employ a multifactorial treatment approach that includes the patient’s age, nature of injury, joint involvement, and displacement among other factors. Historically, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have been the most popular approaches. However, volar plate fixation is quickly becoming a popular option as it minimizes tendon irritation, reduces immobilization time, and decreases risk of complication. The goal of treatment is to restore mobility, reduce pain, and improve functional outcomes following rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to summarize the most common treatments and importance of early referral to hand therapy to improve functional outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50986882017-12-01 Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation Ikpeze, Tochukwu C. Smith, Heather C. Lee, Daniel J. Elfar, John C. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Review Distal radius fractures account for nearly 1 of every 5 fractures in individuals aged 65 or older. Moreover, increased susceptibility to vertebral and hip fractures has been documented in patients a year after suffering a distal radius fracture. Although women are more susceptible to hip fractures, men experience a higher mortality rate in the 7 years following a distal radius fracture. Traditional approaches to distal radius fractures have included both surgical and nonsurgical treatments, with predominant complaints involving weakness, stiffness, and pain. Nonsurgical approaches include immobilization with or without reduction, whereas surgical treatments include dorsal spanning bridge plates, percutaneous pinning, external fixation, and volar plate fixation. The nature of the fracture will determine the best treatment option, and surgeons employ a multifactorial treatment approach that includes the patient’s age, nature of injury, joint involvement, and displacement among other factors. Historically, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning have been the most popular approaches. However, volar plate fixation is quickly becoming a popular option as it minimizes tendon irritation, reduces immobilization time, and decreases risk of complication. The goal of treatment is to restore mobility, reduce pain, and improve functional outcomes following rehabilitation. The aim of this review is to summarize the most common treatments and importance of early referral to hand therapy to improve functional outcomes. SAGE Publications 2016-09-22 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5098688/ /pubmed/27847680 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458516669202 Text en © The Author(s) 2016
spellingShingle Review
Ikpeze, Tochukwu C.
Smith, Heather C.
Lee, Daniel J.
Elfar, John C.
Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation
title Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation
title_full Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation
title_fullStr Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation
title_full_unstemmed Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation
title_short Distal Radius Fracture Outcomes and Rehabilitation
title_sort distal radius fracture outcomes and rehabilitation
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847680
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2151458516669202
work_keys_str_mv AT ikpezetochukwuc distalradiusfractureoutcomesandrehabilitation
AT smithheatherc distalradiusfractureoutcomesandrehabilitation
AT leedanielj distalradiusfractureoutcomesandrehabilitation
AT elfarjohnc distalradiusfractureoutcomesandrehabilitation