Cargando…
Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
CONTEXT: More than half of the bipolar disorder (BD) cases have an additional diagnosis; one of the most difficult to manage is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although some authors recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and BD, the topic remains insufficiently studied. The current...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826323 http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-3604 |
_version_ | 1782465813923495936 |
---|---|
author | Amerio, Andrea Stubbs, Brendon Odone, Anna Tonna, Matteo Marchesi, Carlo Nassir Ghaemi, S. |
author_facet | Amerio, Andrea Stubbs, Brendon Odone, Anna Tonna, Matteo Marchesi, Carlo Nassir Ghaemi, S. |
author_sort | Amerio, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | CONTEXT: More than half of the bipolar disorder (BD) cases have an additional diagnosis; one of the most difficult to manage is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although some authors recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and BD, the topic remains insufficiently studied. The current study aimed to investigate differences in comorbid OCD between BD-I and BD-II. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD. Relevant papers published until June 30, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of BD-I in OCD was 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.4 to 6.4, I2 = 83%, Q = 56) while that of BD-II in OCD was 13.5% (95% CI, 9.3 to 19.3, I2 = 89%, Q = 91). The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD-I was 21.7 (95% CI, 4.8 to 60.3, I2 = 84%, Q = 95). With regard to OCD-BD predictors, mean age and rate of males did not predict the prevalence of BD-I (β = 0.0731, 95% CI, -0.1097 to 0.256, z = 0.78; β = 0.035, 95% CI, -0.2356 to 0.1656, z = 0.34) and BD-II (β = 0.0577, 95% CI, -0.1942 to 0.0788, z = 0.83; β = -0.0317, 95% CI, -0.1483 to 0.085, z = 0.53) in OCD. The mean age explained some of the observed heterogeneity (R2 = 0.13; R2 = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD suggests that BD-OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry. However, the available evidence does not allow to assess whether BD-I or BD-II are more common in patients with OCD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5098723 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50987232016-11-08 Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Amerio, Andrea Stubbs, Brendon Odone, Anna Tonna, Matteo Marchesi, Carlo Nassir Ghaemi, S. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci Review Article CONTEXT: More than half of the bipolar disorder (BD) cases have an additional diagnosis; one of the most difficult to manage is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although some authors recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and BD, the topic remains insufficiently studied. The current study aimed to investigate differences in comorbid OCD between BD-I and BD-II. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD. Relevant papers published until June 30, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of BD-I in OCD was 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.4 to 6.4, I2 = 83%, Q = 56) while that of BD-II in OCD was 13.5% (95% CI, 9.3 to 19.3, I2 = 89%, Q = 91). The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD-I was 21.7 (95% CI, 4.8 to 60.3, I2 = 84%, Q = 95). With regard to OCD-BD predictors, mean age and rate of males did not predict the prevalence of BD-I (β = 0.0731, 95% CI, -0.1097 to 0.256, z = 0.78; β = 0.035, 95% CI, -0.2356 to 0.1656, z = 0.34) and BD-II (β = 0.0577, 95% CI, -0.1942 to 0.0788, z = 0.83; β = -0.0317, 95% CI, -0.1483 to 0.085, z = 0.53) in OCD. The mean age explained some of the observed heterogeneity (R2 = 0.13; R2 = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD suggests that BD-OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry. However, the available evidence does not allow to assess whether BD-I or BD-II are more common in patients with OCD. Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5098723/ /pubmed/27826323 http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-3604 Text en Copyright © 2016, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Amerio, Andrea Stubbs, Brendon Odone, Anna Tonna, Matteo Marchesi, Carlo Nassir Ghaemi, S. Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
title | Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on
Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
title_full | Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on
Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
title_fullStr | Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on
Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on
Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
title_short | Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on
Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder |
title_sort | bipolar i and ii disorders; a systematic review and meta-analysis on
differences in comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098723/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826323 http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-3604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amerioandrea bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT stubbsbrendon bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT odoneanna bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT tonnamatteo bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT marchesicarlo bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder AT nassirghaemis bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder |