Cargando…

Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

CONTEXT: More than half of the bipolar disorder (BD) cases have an additional diagnosis; one of the most difficult to manage is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although some authors recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and BD, the topic remains insufficiently studied. The current...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amerio, Andrea, Stubbs, Brendon, Odone, Anna, Tonna, Matteo, Marchesi, Carlo, Nassir Ghaemi, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826323
http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-3604
_version_ 1782465813923495936
author Amerio, Andrea
Stubbs, Brendon
Odone, Anna
Tonna, Matteo
Marchesi, Carlo
Nassir Ghaemi, S.
author_facet Amerio, Andrea
Stubbs, Brendon
Odone, Anna
Tonna, Matteo
Marchesi, Carlo
Nassir Ghaemi, S.
author_sort Amerio, Andrea
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: More than half of the bipolar disorder (BD) cases have an additional diagnosis; one of the most difficult to manage is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although some authors recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and BD, the topic remains insufficiently studied. The current study aimed to investigate differences in comorbid OCD between BD-I and BD-II. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD. Relevant papers published until June 30, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of BD-I in OCD was 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.4 to 6.4, I2 = 83%, Q = 56) while that of BD-II in OCD was 13.5% (95% CI, 9.3 to 19.3, I2 = 89%, Q = 91). The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD-I was 21.7 (95% CI, 4.8 to 60.3, I2 = 84%, Q = 95). With regard to OCD-BD predictors, mean age and rate of males did not predict the prevalence of BD-I (β = 0.0731, 95% CI, -0.1097 to 0.256, z = 0.78; β = 0.035, 95% CI, -0.2356 to 0.1656, z = 0.34) and BD-II (β = 0.0577, 95% CI, -0.1942 to 0.0788, z = 0.83; β = -0.0317, 95% CI, -0.1483 to 0.085, z = 0.53) in OCD. The mean age explained some of the observed heterogeneity (R2 = 0.13; R2 = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD suggests that BD-OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry. However, the available evidence does not allow to assess whether BD-I or BD-II are more common in patients with OCD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50987232016-11-08 Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Amerio, Andrea Stubbs, Brendon Odone, Anna Tonna, Matteo Marchesi, Carlo Nassir Ghaemi, S. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci Review Article CONTEXT: More than half of the bipolar disorder (BD) cases have an additional diagnosis; one of the most difficult to manage is obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Although some authors recently investigated the co-occurrence of anxiety and BD, the topic remains insufficiently studied. The current study aimed to investigate differences in comorbid OCD between BD-I and BD-II. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD. Relevant papers published until June 30, 2015 were identified searching the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Fourteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of BD-I in OCD was 3.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.4 to 6.4, I2 = 83%, Q = 56) while that of BD-II in OCD was 13.5% (95% CI, 9.3 to 19.3, I2 = 89%, Q = 91). The pooled prevalence of OCD in BD-I was 21.7 (95% CI, 4.8 to 60.3, I2 = 84%, Q = 95). With regard to OCD-BD predictors, mean age and rate of males did not predict the prevalence of BD-I (β = 0.0731, 95% CI, -0.1097 to 0.256, z = 0.78; β = 0.035, 95% CI, -0.2356 to 0.1656, z = 0.34) and BD-II (β = 0.0577, 95% CI, -0.1942 to 0.0788, z = 0.83; β = -0.0317, 95% CI, -0.1483 to 0.085, z = 0.53) in OCD. The mean age explained some of the observed heterogeneity (R2 = 0.13; R2 = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: This first systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and predictors of comorbid BD-I/BD-II and OCD suggests that BD-OCD comorbidity is a common condition in psychiatry. However, the available evidence does not allow to assess whether BD-I or BD-II are more common in patients with OCD. Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2016-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5098723/ /pubmed/27826323 http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-3604 Text en Copyright © 2016, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Amerio, Andrea
Stubbs, Brendon
Odone, Anna
Tonna, Matteo
Marchesi, Carlo
Nassir Ghaemi, S.
Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
title Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
title_full Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
title_fullStr Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
title_short Bipolar I and II Disorders; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Differences in Comorbid Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
title_sort bipolar i and ii disorders; a systematic review and meta-analysis on differences in comorbid obsessive-compulsive disorder
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826323
http://dx.doi.org/10.17795/ijpbs-3604
work_keys_str_mv AT amerioandrea bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT stubbsbrendon bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT odoneanna bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT tonnamatteo bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT marchesicarlo bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder
AT nassirghaemis bipolariandiidisordersasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisondifferencesincomorbidobsessivecompulsivedisorder