Cargando…

Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report

Osseointegrated titanium implants to the cranial skeleton for retention of facial prostheses have proven to be a reliable replacement for adhesive systems. However, improper placement of the implants can jeopardize prosthetic outcomes, and long-term success of an implant-retained prosthesis. Three-d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Yu-Hui, Seelaus, Rosemary, Zhao, Linping, Patel, Pravin K, Cohen, Mimis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843356
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S118139
_version_ 1782465821603266560
author Huang, Yu-Hui
Seelaus, Rosemary
Zhao, Linping
Patel, Pravin K
Cohen, Mimis
author_facet Huang, Yu-Hui
Seelaus, Rosemary
Zhao, Linping
Patel, Pravin K
Cohen, Mimis
author_sort Huang, Yu-Hui
collection PubMed
description Osseointegrated titanium implants to the cranial skeleton for retention of facial prostheses have proven to be a reliable replacement for adhesive systems. However, improper placement of the implants can jeopardize prosthetic outcomes, and long-term success of an implant-retained prosthesis. Three-dimensional (3D) computer imaging, virtual planning, and 3D printing have become accepted components of the preoperative planning and design phase of treatment. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacture that employ cone-beam computed tomography data offer benefits to patient treatment by contributing to greater predictability and improved treatment efficiencies with more reliable outcomes in surgical and prosthetic reconstruction. 3D printing enables transfer of the virtual surgical plan to the operating room by fabrication of surgical guides. Previous studies have shown that accuracy improves considerably with guided implantation when compared to conventional template or freehand implant placement. This clinical case report demonstrates the use of a 3D technological pathway for preoperative virtual planning through prosthesis fabrication, utilizing 3D printing, for a patient with an acquired orbital defect that was restored with an implant-retained silicone orbital prosthesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50987572016-11-14 Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report Huang, Yu-Hui Seelaus, Rosemary Zhao, Linping Patel, Pravin K Cohen, Mimis Int Med Case Rep J Case Report Osseointegrated titanium implants to the cranial skeleton for retention of facial prostheses have proven to be a reliable replacement for adhesive systems. However, improper placement of the implants can jeopardize prosthetic outcomes, and long-term success of an implant-retained prosthesis. Three-dimensional (3D) computer imaging, virtual planning, and 3D printing have become accepted components of the preoperative planning and design phase of treatment. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacture that employ cone-beam computed tomography data offer benefits to patient treatment by contributing to greater predictability and improved treatment efficiencies with more reliable outcomes in surgical and prosthetic reconstruction. 3D printing enables transfer of the virtual surgical plan to the operating room by fabrication of surgical guides. Previous studies have shown that accuracy improves considerably with guided implantation when compared to conventional template or freehand implant placement. This clinical case report demonstrates the use of a 3D technological pathway for preoperative virtual planning through prosthesis fabrication, utilizing 3D printing, for a patient with an acquired orbital defect that was restored with an implant-retained silicone orbital prosthesis. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5098757/ /pubmed/27843356 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S118139 Text en © 2016 Huang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Case Report
Huang, Yu-Hui
Seelaus, Rosemary
Zhao, Linping
Patel, Pravin K
Cohen, Mimis
Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
title Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
title_full Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
title_fullStr Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
title_full_unstemmed Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
title_short Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
title_sort virtual surgical planning and 3d printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843356
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IMCRJ.S118139
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyuhui virtualsurgicalplanningand3dprintinginprostheticorbitalreconstructionwithpercutaneousimplantsatechnicalcasereport
AT seelausrosemary virtualsurgicalplanningand3dprintinginprostheticorbitalreconstructionwithpercutaneousimplantsatechnicalcasereport
AT zhaolinping virtualsurgicalplanningand3dprintinginprostheticorbitalreconstructionwithpercutaneousimplantsatechnicalcasereport
AT patelpravink virtualsurgicalplanningand3dprintinginprostheticorbitalreconstructionwithpercutaneousimplantsatechnicalcasereport
AT cohenmimis virtualsurgicalplanningand3dprintinginprostheticorbitalreconstructionwithpercutaneousimplantsatechnicalcasereport