Cargando…
No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150710 |
_version_ | 1782465853479976960 |
---|---|
author | Saunders, Timothy J. Taylor, Alex H. Atkinson, Quentin D. |
author_facet | Saunders, Timothy J. Taylor, Alex H. Atkinson, Quentin D. |
author_sort | Saunders, Timothy J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the emotion displayed, the number of watchers and the cue type. We also include as statistical controls a range of likely covariates of prosocial behaviour. Using the crowdsourcing Internet marketplace, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), 1535 participants completed our survey and were given the opportunity to donate to charity while being shown an image prime. None of the monitoring primes we tested had a significant effect on charitable giving. By contrast, the control variables of culture, age, sex and previous charity giving frequency did predict donations. This work supports the importance of cultural differences and enduring individual differences in prosocial behaviour and shows that a range of artificial monitoring cues do not reliably boost online charity donation on MTurk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5098958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50989582016-11-16 No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample Saunders, Timothy J. Taylor, Alex H. Atkinson, Quentin D. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the emotion displayed, the number of watchers and the cue type. We also include as statistical controls a range of likely covariates of prosocial behaviour. Using the crowdsourcing Internet marketplace, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), 1535 participants completed our survey and were given the opportunity to donate to charity while being shown an image prime. None of the monitoring primes we tested had a significant effect on charitable giving. By contrast, the control variables of culture, age, sex and previous charity giving frequency did predict donations. This work supports the importance of cultural differences and enduring individual differences in prosocial behaviour and shows that a range of artificial monitoring cues do not reliably boost online charity donation on MTurk. The Royal Society 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5098958/ /pubmed/27853533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150710 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Saunders, Timothy J. Taylor, Alex H. Atkinson, Quentin D. No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample |
title | No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample |
title_full | No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample |
title_fullStr | No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample |
title_full_unstemmed | No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample |
title_short | No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample |
title_sort | no evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an mturk sample |
topic | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150710 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saunderstimothyj noevidencethatarangeofartificialmonitoringcuesinfluenceonlinedonationstocharityinanmturksample AT tayloralexh noevidencethatarangeofartificialmonitoringcuesinfluenceonlinedonationstocharityinanmturksample AT atkinsonquentind noevidencethatarangeofartificialmonitoringcuesinfluenceonlinedonationstocharityinanmturksample |