Cargando…

No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample

Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saunders, Timothy J., Taylor, Alex H., Atkinson, Quentin D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150710
_version_ 1782465853479976960
author Saunders, Timothy J.
Taylor, Alex H.
Atkinson, Quentin D.
author_facet Saunders, Timothy J.
Taylor, Alex H.
Atkinson, Quentin D.
author_sort Saunders, Timothy J.
collection PubMed
description Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the emotion displayed, the number of watchers and the cue type. We also include as statistical controls a range of likely covariates of prosocial behaviour. Using the crowdsourcing Internet marketplace, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), 1535 participants completed our survey and were given the opportunity to donate to charity while being shown an image prime. None of the monitoring primes we tested had a significant effect on charitable giving. By contrast, the control variables of culture, age, sex and previous charity giving frequency did predict donations. This work supports the importance of cultural differences and enduring individual differences in prosocial behaviour and shows that a range of artificial monitoring cues do not reliably boost online charity donation on MTurk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5098958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50989582016-11-16 No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample Saunders, Timothy J. Taylor, Alex H. Atkinson, Quentin D. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Monitoring cues, such as an image of a face or pair of eyes, have been found to increase prosocial behaviour in several studies. However, other studies have found little or no support for this effect. Here, we examined whether monitoring cues affect online donations to charity while manipulating the emotion displayed, the number of watchers and the cue type. We also include as statistical controls a range of likely covariates of prosocial behaviour. Using the crowdsourcing Internet marketplace, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), 1535 participants completed our survey and were given the opportunity to donate to charity while being shown an image prime. None of the monitoring primes we tested had a significant effect on charitable giving. By contrast, the control variables of culture, age, sex and previous charity giving frequency did predict donations. This work supports the importance of cultural differences and enduring individual differences in prosocial behaviour and shows that a range of artificial monitoring cues do not reliably boost online charity donation on MTurk. The Royal Society 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5098958/ /pubmed/27853533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150710 Text en © 2016 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Saunders, Timothy J.
Taylor, Alex H.
Atkinson, Quentin D.
No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
title No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
title_full No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
title_fullStr No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
title_full_unstemmed No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
title_short No evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an MTurk sample
title_sort no evidence that a range of artificial monitoring cues influence online donations to charity in an mturk sample
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5098958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27853533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150710
work_keys_str_mv AT saunderstimothyj noevidencethatarangeofartificialmonitoringcuesinfluenceonlinedonationstocharityinanmturksample
AT tayloralexh noevidencethatarangeofartificialmonitoringcuesinfluenceonlinedonationstocharityinanmturksample
AT atkinsonquentind noevidencethatarangeofartificialmonitoringcuesinfluenceonlinedonationstocharityinanmturksample