Cargando…

Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments

PURPOSE: Pre-surface treatments of coping materials have been recommended to enhance the bonding to the veneering ceramic. Little is known on the effect on shear bond strength, particularly with new coping material. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of veneering cerami...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarib, Natasya Ahmad, Anuar, Norsamihah, Ahmad, Marlynda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.339
_version_ 1782465880536383488
author Tarib, Natasya Ahmad
Anuar, Norsamihah
Ahmad, Marlynda
author_facet Tarib, Natasya Ahmad
Anuar, Norsamihah
Ahmad, Marlynda
author_sort Tarib, Natasya Ahmad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Pre-surface treatments of coping materials have been recommended to enhance the bonding to the veneering ceramic. Little is known on the effect on shear bond strength, particularly with new coping material. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to three coping materials: i) metal alloy (MA), ii) zirconia oxide (ZO), and iii) lithium disilicate (LD) after various pre-surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two (n = 32) discs were prepared for each coping material. Four pre-surface treatments were prepared for each sub-group (n = 8); a) no treatment or control (C), b) sandblast (SB), c) acid etch (AE), and d) sandblast and acid etch (SBAE). Veneering ceramics were applied to all discs. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons tests. RESULTS: Mean shear bond strengths were obtained for MA (19.00 ± 6.39 MPa), ZO (24.45 ± 5.14 MPa) and LD (13.62 ± 5.12 MPa). There were statistically significant differences in types of coping material and various pre-surface treatments (P<.05). There was a significant correlation between coping materials and pre-surface treatment to the shear bond strength (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia oxide was higher than metal alloy and lithium disilicate. The highest shear bond strengths were obtained in sandblast and acid etch treatment for zirconia oxide and lithium disilicate groups, and in acid etch treatment for metal alloy group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099125
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50991252016-11-08 Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments Tarib, Natasya Ahmad Anuar, Norsamihah Ahmad, Marlynda J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Pre-surface treatments of coping materials have been recommended to enhance the bonding to the veneering ceramic. Little is known on the effect on shear bond strength, particularly with new coping material. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to three coping materials: i) metal alloy (MA), ii) zirconia oxide (ZO), and iii) lithium disilicate (LD) after various pre-surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two (n = 32) discs were prepared for each coping material. Four pre-surface treatments were prepared for each sub-group (n = 8); a) no treatment or control (C), b) sandblast (SB), c) acid etch (AE), and d) sandblast and acid etch (SBAE). Veneering ceramics were applied to all discs. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons tests. RESULTS: Mean shear bond strengths were obtained for MA (19.00 ± 6.39 MPa), ZO (24.45 ± 5.14 MPa) and LD (13.62 ± 5.12 MPa). There were statistically significant differences in types of coping material and various pre-surface treatments (P<.05). There was a significant correlation between coping materials and pre-surface treatment to the shear bond strength (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia oxide was higher than metal alloy and lithium disilicate. The highest shear bond strengths were obtained in sandblast and acid etch treatment for zirconia oxide and lithium disilicate groups, and in acid etch treatment for metal alloy group. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016-10 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5099125/ /pubmed/27826383 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.339 Text en © 2016 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tarib, Natasya Ahmad
Anuar, Norsamihah
Ahmad, Marlynda
Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
title Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
title_full Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
title_fullStr Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
title_short Shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
title_sort shear bond strength of veneering ceramic to coping materials with different pre-surface treatments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099125/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826383
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.339
work_keys_str_mv AT taribnatasyaahmad shearbondstrengthofveneeringceramictocopingmaterialswithdifferentpresurfacetreatments
AT anuarnorsamihah shearbondstrengthofveneeringceramictocopingmaterialswithdifferentpresurfacetreatments
AT ahmadmarlynda shearbondstrengthofveneeringceramictocopingmaterialswithdifferentpresurfacetreatments