Cargando…

Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading

PURPOSE: Early loading of implant can be determined by excellent primary stability and characteristic of implant surface. The implant system with recently improved surface can have load application 4-6 weeks after installing in maxilla and mandible. This study evaluated the effect of healing period...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Seong-Beom, Yun, Pil-Young, Kim, Sang-Yun, Yi, Yang-Jin, Kim, Ji-Yun, Kim, Young-Kyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826390
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.396
_version_ 1782465882344128512
author Kim, Seong-Beom
Yun, Pil-Young
Kim, Sang-Yun
Yi, Yang-Jin
Kim, Ji-Yun
Kim, Young-Kyun
author_facet Kim, Seong-Beom
Yun, Pil-Young
Kim, Sang-Yun
Yi, Yang-Jin
Kim, Ji-Yun
Kim, Young-Kyun
author_sort Kim, Seong-Beom
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Early loading of implant can be determined by excellent primary stability and characteristic of implant surface. The implant system with recently improved surface can have load application 4-6 weeks after installing in maxilla and mandible. This study evaluated the effect of healing period to the stability of hydrophilic tapered-type implant at maxillary posterior area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 30 patients treated by hydrophilic tapered-type implants (total 41 implants at maxilla) and classified by two groups depending on healing period. Group 1 (11 patients, 15 implants) was a control group and the healing period was 12 weeks, and Group 2 (19 patients, 26 implants) was test group and the healing period was 6 weeks. Immediately after implant placement, at the first impression taking, implant stability was measured using Osstell Mentor. The patients also took periapical radiographs after restoration delivery, 12 months after restoration and final followup period. The marginal bone loss around the implants was measured using the periapical radiographs. RESULTS: All implants were survived and success rate was 97.56%. The marginal bone loss was less than 1mm after 1 year postoperatively except the one implant. The stabilities of the implants were not correlated with age, healing period until loading, insertion torque (IT), the diameter of fixture and the location of implant. Only the quality of bone in group 2 (6 week) was correlated with the stability of implant. CONCLUSION: Healing period of 6 weeks can make the similar clinical prognosis of implants to that of healing period of 12 weeks if bone quality is carefully considered in case of early loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50991322016-11-08 Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading Kim, Seong-Beom Yun, Pil-Young Kim, Sang-Yun Yi, Yang-Jin Kim, Ji-Yun Kim, Young-Kyun J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Early loading of implant can be determined by excellent primary stability and characteristic of implant surface. The implant system with recently improved surface can have load application 4-6 weeks after installing in maxilla and mandible. This study evaluated the effect of healing period to the stability of hydrophilic tapered-type implant at maxillary posterior area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 30 patients treated by hydrophilic tapered-type implants (total 41 implants at maxilla) and classified by two groups depending on healing period. Group 1 (11 patients, 15 implants) was a control group and the healing period was 12 weeks, and Group 2 (19 patients, 26 implants) was test group and the healing period was 6 weeks. Immediately after implant placement, at the first impression taking, implant stability was measured using Osstell Mentor. The patients also took periapical radiographs after restoration delivery, 12 months after restoration and final followup period. The marginal bone loss around the implants was measured using the periapical radiographs. RESULTS: All implants were survived and success rate was 97.56%. The marginal bone loss was less than 1mm after 1 year postoperatively except the one implant. The stabilities of the implants were not correlated with age, healing period until loading, insertion torque (IT), the diameter of fixture and the location of implant. Only the quality of bone in group 2 (6 week) was correlated with the stability of implant. CONCLUSION: Healing period of 6 weeks can make the similar clinical prognosis of implants to that of healing period of 12 weeks if bone quality is carefully considered in case of early loading. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2016-10 2016-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5099132/ /pubmed/27826390 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.396 Text en © 2016 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Seong-Beom
Yun, Pil-Young
Kim, Sang-Yun
Yi, Yang-Jin
Kim, Ji-Yun
Kim, Young-Kyun
Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
title Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
title_full Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
title_fullStr Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
title_full_unstemmed Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
title_short Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
title_sort prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826390
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.396
work_keys_str_mv AT kimseongbeom prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialofhydrophilictaperedimplantplacementatmaxillaryposteriorarea6weeksand12weeksloading
AT yunpilyoung prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialofhydrophilictaperedimplantplacementatmaxillaryposteriorarea6weeksand12weeksloading
AT kimsangyun prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialofhydrophilictaperedimplantplacementatmaxillaryposteriorarea6weeksand12weeksloading
AT yiyangjin prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialofhydrophilictaperedimplantplacementatmaxillaryposteriorarea6weeksand12weeksloading
AT kimjiyun prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialofhydrophilictaperedimplantplacementatmaxillaryposteriorarea6weeksand12weeksloading
AT kimyoungkyun prospectiverandomizedclinicaltrialofhydrophilictaperedimplantplacementatmaxillaryposteriorarea6weeksand12weeksloading