Cargando…

Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) for chronic back pain remains controversial due to insufficient trial data. We aimed to conduct an updated review to determine if LLLT (including laser acupuncture) has specific benefits in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glazov, Gregory, Yelland, Michael, Emery, Jon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2015-011036
_version_ 1782465902766194688
author Glazov, Gregory
Yelland, Michael
Emery, Jon
author_facet Glazov, Gregory
Yelland, Michael
Emery, Jon
author_sort Glazov, Gregory
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) for chronic back pain remains controversial due to insufficient trial data. We aimed to conduct an updated review to determine if LLLT (including laser acupuncture) has specific benefits in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomised trials using sham controls and blinded assessment examining the intervention of LLLT in adults with CNLBP. Primary outcomes were pain and global assessment of improvement with up to short-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes were disability, range of back movement, and adverse effects. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted. Subgroup analyses were based on laser dose, duration of baseline pain, and whether or not laser therapy used an acupuncture approach. RESULTS: 15 studies were selected involving 1039 participants. At immediate and short-term follow-up there was significant pain reduction of up to WMD (weighted mean difference) −1.40 cm (95% CI −1.91 to −0.88 cm) in favour of laser treatment, occurring in trials using at least 3 Joules (J) per point, with baseline pain <30 months and in non-acupuncture LLLT trials. Global assessment showed a risk ratio of 2.16 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.90) in favour of laser treatment in the same groups only at immediate follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated moderate quality of evidence (GRADE) to support a clinically important benefit in LLLT for CNLBP in the short term, which was only seen following higher laser dose interventions and in participants with a shorter duration of back pain. Rigorously blinded trials using appropriate laser dosage would provide greater certainty around this conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50991862016-11-14 Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials Glazov, Gregory Yelland, Michael Emery, Jon Acupunct Med Original Paper OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of low-level laser treatment (LLLT) for chronic back pain remains controversial due to insufficient trial data. We aimed to conduct an updated review to determine if LLLT (including laser acupuncture) has specific benefits in chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomised trials using sham controls and blinded assessment examining the intervention of LLLT in adults with CNLBP. Primary outcomes were pain and global assessment of improvement with up to short-term follow-up. Secondary outcomes were disability, range of back movement, and adverse effects. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted. Subgroup analyses were based on laser dose, duration of baseline pain, and whether or not laser therapy used an acupuncture approach. RESULTS: 15 studies were selected involving 1039 participants. At immediate and short-term follow-up there was significant pain reduction of up to WMD (weighted mean difference) −1.40 cm (95% CI −1.91 to −0.88 cm) in favour of laser treatment, occurring in trials using at least 3 Joules (J) per point, with baseline pain <30 months and in non-acupuncture LLLT trials. Global assessment showed a risk ratio of 2.16 (95% CI 1.61 to 2.90) in favour of laser treatment in the same groups only at immediate follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated moderate quality of evidence (GRADE) to support a clinically important benefit in LLLT for CNLBP in the short term, which was only seen following higher laser dose interventions and in participants with a shorter duration of back pain. Rigorously blinded trials using appropriate laser dosage would provide greater certainty around this conclusion. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-10 2016-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5099186/ /pubmed/27207675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2015-011036 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Paper
Glazov, Gregory
Yelland, Michael
Emery, Jon
Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort low-level laser therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27207675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/acupmed-2015-011036
work_keys_str_mv AT glazovgregory lowlevellasertherapyforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT yellandmichael lowlevellasertherapyforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT emeryjon lowlevellasertherapyforchronicnonspecificlowbackpainametaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials