Cargando…

Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial is a randomised pilot trial of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for individuals at high risk of lung cancer. We assessed the long-term psychosocial impact on individuals participating in the UKLS trial. METHODS: A random sample of individuals aged 50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brain, Kate, Lifford, Kate J, Carter, Ben, Burke, Olivia, McRonald, Fiona, Devaraj, Anand, Hansell, David M, Baldwin, David, Duffy, Stephen W, Field, John K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208283
_version_ 1782465905194696704
author Brain, Kate
Lifford, Kate J
Carter, Ben
Burke, Olivia
McRonald, Fiona
Devaraj, Anand
Hansell, David M
Baldwin, David
Duffy, Stephen W
Field, John K
author_facet Brain, Kate
Lifford, Kate J
Carter, Ben
Burke, Olivia
McRonald, Fiona
Devaraj, Anand
Hansell, David M
Baldwin, David
Duffy, Stephen W
Field, John K
author_sort Brain, Kate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial is a randomised pilot trial of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for individuals at high risk of lung cancer. We assessed the long-term psychosocial impact on individuals participating in the UKLS trial. METHODS: A random sample of individuals aged 50–75 years was contacted via primary care. High-risk individuals who completed T(0) questionnaires (baseline) were randomised to LDCT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). T(1) questionnaires were sent 2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment. T(2) questionnaires were sent up to 2 years after recruitment. Measures included cancer distress, anxiety, depression and decision satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 4037 high-risk individuals were randomised and they completed T(0) questionnaires (n=2018 intervention, n=2019 control). Cancer distress was higher at T(1) in intervention arm participants who received positive screening results (p≤0.001), but not at T(2) (p=0.04). T(2) anxiety (p≤0.001) and depression (p≤0.01) were higher in the control arm, but the absolute differences were small and not clinically relevant. At both time points, fewer control than screened participants were satisfied with their decision to participate in UKLS (p≤0.001). Regardless of trial allocation, cancer distress was higher in women (p≤0.01), participants aged ≤65 years (p≤0.001), current smokers (p≤0.001), those with lung cancer experience (p≤0.001) and those recruited from the Liverpool area (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Lung cancer screening using LDCT appears to have no clinically significant long-term psychosocial impact on high-risk participants. Strategies for engaging and supporting underserved groups are the key to implement routine lung cancer screening in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 78513845; results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50991882016-11-14 Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial Brain, Kate Lifford, Kate J Carter, Ben Burke, Olivia McRonald, Fiona Devaraj, Anand Hansell, David M Baldwin, David Duffy, Stephen W Field, John K Thorax Lung Cancer BACKGROUND: The UK Lung Cancer Screening (UKLS) trial is a randomised pilot trial of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for individuals at high risk of lung cancer. We assessed the long-term psychosocial impact on individuals participating in the UKLS trial. METHODS: A random sample of individuals aged 50–75 years was contacted via primary care. High-risk individuals who completed T(0) questionnaires (baseline) were randomised to LDCT screening (intervention) or usual care (no screening control). T(1) questionnaires were sent 2 weeks after baseline scan results or control assignment. T(2) questionnaires were sent up to 2 years after recruitment. Measures included cancer distress, anxiety, depression and decision satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 4037 high-risk individuals were randomised and they completed T(0) questionnaires (n=2018 intervention, n=2019 control). Cancer distress was higher at T(1) in intervention arm participants who received positive screening results (p≤0.001), but not at T(2) (p=0.04). T(2) anxiety (p≤0.001) and depression (p≤0.01) were higher in the control arm, but the absolute differences were small and not clinically relevant. At both time points, fewer control than screened participants were satisfied with their decision to participate in UKLS (p≤0.001). Regardless of trial allocation, cancer distress was higher in women (p≤0.01), participants aged ≤65 years (p≤0.001), current smokers (p≤0.001), those with lung cancer experience (p≤0.001) and those recruited from the Liverpool area (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Lung cancer screening using LDCT appears to have no clinically significant long-term psychosocial impact on high-risk participants. Strategies for engaging and supporting underserved groups are the key to implement routine lung cancer screening in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN 78513845; results. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-11 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5099188/ /pubmed/27471048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208283 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Lung Cancer
Brain, Kate
Lifford, Kate J
Carter, Ben
Burke, Olivia
McRonald, Fiona
Devaraj, Anand
Hansell, David M
Baldwin, David
Duffy, Stephen W
Field, John K
Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial
title Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial
title_full Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial
title_short Long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose CT screening: results of the UK Lung Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial
title_sort long-term psychosocial outcomes of low-dose ct screening: results of the uk lung cancer screening randomised controlled trial
topic Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27471048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208283
work_keys_str_mv AT brainkate longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT liffordkatej longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT carterben longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT burkeolivia longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcronaldfiona longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT devarajanand longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hanselldavidm longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT baldwindavid longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duffystephenw longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fieldjohnk longtermpsychosocialoutcomesoflowdosectscreeningresultsoftheuklungcancerscreeningrandomisedcontrolledtrial