Cargando…

Rhythm on Your Lips

The Iambic-Trochaic Law (ITL) accounts for speech rhythm, grouping of sounds as either Iambs—if alternating in duration—or Trochees—if alternating in pitch and/or intensity. The two different rhythms signal word order, one of the basic syntactic properties of language. We investigated the extent to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peña, Marcela, Langus, Alan, Gutiérrez, César, Huepe-Artigas, Daniela, Nespor, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01708
_version_ 1782465928251834368
author Peña, Marcela
Langus, Alan
Gutiérrez, César
Huepe-Artigas, Daniela
Nespor, Marina
author_facet Peña, Marcela
Langus, Alan
Gutiérrez, César
Huepe-Artigas, Daniela
Nespor, Marina
author_sort Peña, Marcela
collection PubMed
description The Iambic-Trochaic Law (ITL) accounts for speech rhythm, grouping of sounds as either Iambs—if alternating in duration—or Trochees—if alternating in pitch and/or intensity. The two different rhythms signal word order, one of the basic syntactic properties of language. We investigated the extent to which Iambic and Trochaic phrases could be auditorily and visually recognized, when visual stimuli engage lip reading. Our results show both rhythmic patterns were recognized from both, auditory and visual stimuli, suggesting that speech rhythm has a multimodal representation. We further explored whether participants could match Iambic and Trochaic phrases across the two modalities. We found that participants auditorily familiarized with Trochees, but not with Iambs, were more accurate in recognizing visual targets, while participants visually familiarized with Iambs, but not with Trochees, were more accurate in recognizing auditory targets. The latter results suggest an asymmetric processing of speech rhythm: in auditory domain, the changes in either pitch or intensity are better perceived and represented than changes in duration, while in the visual domain the changes in duration are better processed and represented than changes in pitch, raising important questions about domain general and specialized mechanisms for speech rhythm processing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50992492016-11-22 Rhythm on Your Lips Peña, Marcela Langus, Alan Gutiérrez, César Huepe-Artigas, Daniela Nespor, Marina Front Psychol Psychology The Iambic-Trochaic Law (ITL) accounts for speech rhythm, grouping of sounds as either Iambs—if alternating in duration—or Trochees—if alternating in pitch and/or intensity. The two different rhythms signal word order, one of the basic syntactic properties of language. We investigated the extent to which Iambic and Trochaic phrases could be auditorily and visually recognized, when visual stimuli engage lip reading. Our results show both rhythmic patterns were recognized from both, auditory and visual stimuli, suggesting that speech rhythm has a multimodal representation. We further explored whether participants could match Iambic and Trochaic phrases across the two modalities. We found that participants auditorily familiarized with Trochees, but not with Iambs, were more accurate in recognizing visual targets, while participants visually familiarized with Iambs, but not with Trochees, were more accurate in recognizing auditory targets. The latter results suggest an asymmetric processing of speech rhythm: in auditory domain, the changes in either pitch or intensity are better perceived and represented than changes in duration, while in the visual domain the changes in duration are better processed and represented than changes in pitch, raising important questions about domain general and specialized mechanisms for speech rhythm processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5099249/ /pubmed/27877144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01708 Text en Copyright © 2016 Peña, Langus, Gutiérrez, Huepe-Artigas and Nespor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Peña, Marcela
Langus, Alan
Gutiérrez, César
Huepe-Artigas, Daniela
Nespor, Marina
Rhythm on Your Lips
title Rhythm on Your Lips
title_full Rhythm on Your Lips
title_fullStr Rhythm on Your Lips
title_full_unstemmed Rhythm on Your Lips
title_short Rhythm on Your Lips
title_sort rhythm on your lips
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877144
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01708
work_keys_str_mv AT penamarcela rhythmonyourlips
AT langusalan rhythmonyourlips
AT gutierrezcesar rhythmonyourlips
AT huepeartigasdaniela rhythmonyourlips
AT nespormarina rhythmonyourlips