Cargando…
Rhythm on Your Lips
The Iambic-Trochaic Law (ITL) accounts for speech rhythm, grouping of sounds as either Iambs—if alternating in duration—or Trochees—if alternating in pitch and/or intensity. The two different rhythms signal word order, one of the basic syntactic properties of language. We investigated the extent to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01708 |
_version_ | 1782465928251834368 |
---|---|
author | Peña, Marcela Langus, Alan Gutiérrez, César Huepe-Artigas, Daniela Nespor, Marina |
author_facet | Peña, Marcela Langus, Alan Gutiérrez, César Huepe-Artigas, Daniela Nespor, Marina |
author_sort | Peña, Marcela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Iambic-Trochaic Law (ITL) accounts for speech rhythm, grouping of sounds as either Iambs—if alternating in duration—or Trochees—if alternating in pitch and/or intensity. The two different rhythms signal word order, one of the basic syntactic properties of language. We investigated the extent to which Iambic and Trochaic phrases could be auditorily and visually recognized, when visual stimuli engage lip reading. Our results show both rhythmic patterns were recognized from both, auditory and visual stimuli, suggesting that speech rhythm has a multimodal representation. We further explored whether participants could match Iambic and Trochaic phrases across the two modalities. We found that participants auditorily familiarized with Trochees, but not with Iambs, were more accurate in recognizing visual targets, while participants visually familiarized with Iambs, but not with Trochees, were more accurate in recognizing auditory targets. The latter results suggest an asymmetric processing of speech rhythm: in auditory domain, the changes in either pitch or intensity are better perceived and represented than changes in duration, while in the visual domain the changes in duration are better processed and represented than changes in pitch, raising important questions about domain general and specialized mechanisms for speech rhythm processing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5099249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50992492016-11-22 Rhythm on Your Lips Peña, Marcela Langus, Alan Gutiérrez, César Huepe-Artigas, Daniela Nespor, Marina Front Psychol Psychology The Iambic-Trochaic Law (ITL) accounts for speech rhythm, grouping of sounds as either Iambs—if alternating in duration—or Trochees—if alternating in pitch and/or intensity. The two different rhythms signal word order, one of the basic syntactic properties of language. We investigated the extent to which Iambic and Trochaic phrases could be auditorily and visually recognized, when visual stimuli engage lip reading. Our results show both rhythmic patterns were recognized from both, auditory and visual stimuli, suggesting that speech rhythm has a multimodal representation. We further explored whether participants could match Iambic and Trochaic phrases across the two modalities. We found that participants auditorily familiarized with Trochees, but not with Iambs, were more accurate in recognizing visual targets, while participants visually familiarized with Iambs, but not with Trochees, were more accurate in recognizing auditory targets. The latter results suggest an asymmetric processing of speech rhythm: in auditory domain, the changes in either pitch or intensity are better perceived and represented than changes in duration, while in the visual domain the changes in duration are better processed and represented than changes in pitch, raising important questions about domain general and specialized mechanisms for speech rhythm processing. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5099249/ /pubmed/27877144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01708 Text en Copyright © 2016 Peña, Langus, Gutiérrez, Huepe-Artigas and Nespor. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Peña, Marcela Langus, Alan Gutiérrez, César Huepe-Artigas, Daniela Nespor, Marina Rhythm on Your Lips |
title | Rhythm on Your Lips |
title_full | Rhythm on Your Lips |
title_fullStr | Rhythm on Your Lips |
title_full_unstemmed | Rhythm on Your Lips |
title_short | Rhythm on Your Lips |
title_sort | rhythm on your lips |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877144 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01708 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penamarcela rhythmonyourlips AT langusalan rhythmonyourlips AT gutierrezcesar rhythmonyourlips AT huepeartigasdaniela rhythmonyourlips AT nespormarina rhythmonyourlips |