Cargando…

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have become recently available, non-MRI conditional devices and the presence of epicardial and abandoned leads remain a contraindication for MRIs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hwang, You Mi, Kim, Jun, Lee, Ji Hyun, Kim, Minsu, Nam, Gi-Byoung, Choi, Kee-Joon, Kim, You-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Cardiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.6.804
_version_ 1782465950444945408
author Hwang, You Mi
Kim, Jun
Lee, Ji Hyun
Kim, Minsu
Nam, Gi-Byoung
Choi, Kee-Joon
Kim, You-Ho
author_facet Hwang, You Mi
Kim, Jun
Lee, Ji Hyun
Kim, Minsu
Nam, Gi-Byoung
Choi, Kee-Joon
Kim, You-Ho
author_sort Hwang, You Mi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have become recently available, non-MRI conditional devices and the presence of epicardial and abandoned leads remain a contraindication for MRIs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a single center retrospective study, evaluating the clinical outcomes and device parameter changes in patients with CIEDs who underwent an MRI from June 1992 to March 2015. Clinical and device related information was acquired by a thorough chart review. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients, 38 with a pacemaker (including epicardially located pacemaker leads) and 2 with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, underwent 50 MRI examinations. Among the patients, 11 had MRI conditional CIEDs, while the remaining had non-MRI conditional devices. Among these patients, 23 patients had traditional contraindications for an MRI: (1) nonfunctional leads (n=1, 2.5%), (2) epicardially located leads (n=9, 22.5%), (3) scanning area in proximity to a device (n=9, 22.5%), (4) devices implanted within 6 weeks (n=2, 5%), and (5) MRI field strength at 3.0 Tesla (n=6, 15%). All patients underwent a satisfactory MRI examination with no adverse events during or after the procedure. There were no significant changes in parameters or malfunctioning devices in any patients with CIEDs. CONCLUSION: Under careful monitoring, MRI is safe to perform on patients with non-MRI conditional CIEDs, remnant leads, and epicardially located leads, as well as MRI-conditional devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099336
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50993362016-11-08 Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hwang, You Mi Kim, Jun Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Minsu Nam, Gi-Byoung Choi, Kee-Joon Kim, You-Ho Korean Circ J Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have become recently available, non-MRI conditional devices and the presence of epicardial and abandoned leads remain a contraindication for MRIs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a single center retrospective study, evaluating the clinical outcomes and device parameter changes in patients with CIEDs who underwent an MRI from June 1992 to March 2015. Clinical and device related information was acquired by a thorough chart review. RESULTS: A total of 40 patients, 38 with a pacemaker (including epicardially located pacemaker leads) and 2 with implantable cardioverter defibrillators, underwent 50 MRI examinations. Among the patients, 11 had MRI conditional CIEDs, while the remaining had non-MRI conditional devices. Among these patients, 23 patients had traditional contraindications for an MRI: (1) nonfunctional leads (n=1, 2.5%), (2) epicardially located leads (n=9, 22.5%), (3) scanning area in proximity to a device (n=9, 22.5%), (4) devices implanted within 6 weeks (n=2, 5%), and (5) MRI field strength at 3.0 Tesla (n=6, 15%). All patients underwent a satisfactory MRI examination with no adverse events during or after the procedure. There were no significant changes in parameters or malfunctioning devices in any patients with CIEDs. CONCLUSION: Under careful monitoring, MRI is safe to perform on patients with non-MRI conditional CIEDs, remnant leads, and epicardially located leads, as well as MRI-conditional devices. The Korean Society of Cardiology 2016-11 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5099336/ /pubmed/27826339 http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.6.804 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Cardiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hwang, You Mi
Kim, Jun
Lee, Ji Hyun
Kim, Minsu
Nam, Gi-Byoung
Choi, Kee-Joon
Kim, You-Ho
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_fullStr Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_short Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Safety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging
title_sort cardiac implantable electronic device safety during magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099336/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826339
http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2016.46.6.804
work_keys_str_mv AT hwangyoumi cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kimjun cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging
AT leejihyun cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kimminsu cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging
AT namgibyoung cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging
AT choikeejoon cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging
AT kimyouho cardiacimplantableelectronicdevicesafetyduringmagneticresonanceimaging