Cargando…

Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVE: It is essential to develop predictive algorithms for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) disease progression to allow for efficient clinical trials and patient care. The best existing predictive models rely on several months of baseline data and have only been validated in clinical trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor, Albert A., Fournier, Christina, Polak, Meraida, Wang, Liuxia, Zach, Neta, Keymer, Mike, Glass, Jonathan D., Ennist, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27844032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.348
_version_ 1782465982866915328
author Taylor, Albert A.
Fournier, Christina
Polak, Meraida
Wang, Liuxia
Zach, Neta
Keymer, Mike
Glass, Jonathan D.
Ennist, David L.
author_facet Taylor, Albert A.
Fournier, Christina
Polak, Meraida
Wang, Liuxia
Zach, Neta
Keymer, Mike
Glass, Jonathan D.
Ennist, David L.
author_sort Taylor, Albert A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is essential to develop predictive algorithms for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) disease progression to allow for efficient clinical trials and patient care. The best existing predictive models rely on several months of baseline data and have only been validated in clinical trial research datasets. We asked whether a model developed using clinical research patient data could be applied to the broader ALS population typically seen at a tertiary care ALS clinic. METHODS: Based on the PRO‐ACT ALS database, we developed random forest (RF), pre‐slope, and generalized linear (GLM) models to test whether accurate, unbiased models could be created using only baseline data. Secondly, we tested whether a model could be validated with a clinical patient dataset to demonstrate broader applicability. RESULTS: We found that a random forest model using only baseline data could accurately predict disease progression for a clinical trial research dataset as well as a population of patients being treated at a tertiary care clinic. The RF Model outperformed a pre‐slope model and was similar to a GLM model in terms of root mean square deviation at early time points. At later time points, the RF Model was far superior to either model. Finally, we found that only the RF Model was unbiased and was less subject to overfitting than either of the other two models when applied to a clinic population. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the RF Model delivers superior predictions of ALS disease progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50995322016-11-14 Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Taylor, Albert A. Fournier, Christina Polak, Meraida Wang, Liuxia Zach, Neta Keymer, Mike Glass, Jonathan D. Ennist, David L. Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: It is essential to develop predictive algorithms for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) disease progression to allow for efficient clinical trials and patient care. The best existing predictive models rely on several months of baseline data and have only been validated in clinical trial research datasets. We asked whether a model developed using clinical research patient data could be applied to the broader ALS population typically seen at a tertiary care ALS clinic. METHODS: Based on the PRO‐ACT ALS database, we developed random forest (RF), pre‐slope, and generalized linear (GLM) models to test whether accurate, unbiased models could be created using only baseline data. Secondly, we tested whether a model could be validated with a clinical patient dataset to demonstrate broader applicability. RESULTS: We found that a random forest model using only baseline data could accurately predict disease progression for a clinical trial research dataset as well as a population of patients being treated at a tertiary care clinic. The RF Model outperformed a pre‐slope model and was similar to a GLM model in terms of root mean square deviation at early time points. At later time points, the RF Model was far superior to either model. Finally, we found that only the RF Model was unbiased and was less subject to overfitting than either of the other two models when applied to a clinic population. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the RF Model delivers superior predictions of ALS disease progression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5099532/ /pubmed/27844032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.348 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Taylor, Albert A.
Fournier, Christina
Polak, Meraida
Wang, Liuxia
Zach, Neta
Keymer, Mike
Glass, Jonathan D.
Ennist, David L.
Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
title Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
title_full Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
title_fullStr Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
title_short Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
title_sort predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27844032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.348
work_keys_str_mv AT tayloralberta predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT fournierchristina predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT polakmeraida predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT wangliuxia predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT zachneta predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT keymermike predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT glassjonathand predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT ennistdavidl predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis
AT predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis