Cargando…
Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
OBJECTIVE: It is essential to develop predictive algorithms for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) disease progression to allow for efficient clinical trials and patient care. The best existing predictive models rely on several months of baseline data and have only been validated in clinical trial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27844032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.348 |
_version_ | 1782465982866915328 |
---|---|
author | Taylor, Albert A. Fournier, Christina Polak, Meraida Wang, Liuxia Zach, Neta Keymer, Mike Glass, Jonathan D. Ennist, David L. |
author_facet | Taylor, Albert A. Fournier, Christina Polak, Meraida Wang, Liuxia Zach, Neta Keymer, Mike Glass, Jonathan D. Ennist, David L. |
author_sort | Taylor, Albert A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: It is essential to develop predictive algorithms for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) disease progression to allow for efficient clinical trials and patient care. The best existing predictive models rely on several months of baseline data and have only been validated in clinical trial research datasets. We asked whether a model developed using clinical research patient data could be applied to the broader ALS population typically seen at a tertiary care ALS clinic. METHODS: Based on the PRO‐ACT ALS database, we developed random forest (RF), pre‐slope, and generalized linear (GLM) models to test whether accurate, unbiased models could be created using only baseline data. Secondly, we tested whether a model could be validated with a clinical patient dataset to demonstrate broader applicability. RESULTS: We found that a random forest model using only baseline data could accurately predict disease progression for a clinical trial research dataset as well as a population of patients being treated at a tertiary care clinic. The RF Model outperformed a pre‐slope model and was similar to a GLM model in terms of root mean square deviation at early time points. At later time points, the RF Model was far superior to either model. Finally, we found that only the RF Model was unbiased and was less subject to overfitting than either of the other two models when applied to a clinic population. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the RF Model delivers superior predictions of ALS disease progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5099532 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50995322016-11-14 Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Taylor, Albert A. Fournier, Christina Polak, Meraida Wang, Liuxia Zach, Neta Keymer, Mike Glass, Jonathan D. Ennist, David L. Ann Clin Transl Neurol Research Articles OBJECTIVE: It is essential to develop predictive algorithms for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) disease progression to allow for efficient clinical trials and patient care. The best existing predictive models rely on several months of baseline data and have only been validated in clinical trial research datasets. We asked whether a model developed using clinical research patient data could be applied to the broader ALS population typically seen at a tertiary care ALS clinic. METHODS: Based on the PRO‐ACT ALS database, we developed random forest (RF), pre‐slope, and generalized linear (GLM) models to test whether accurate, unbiased models could be created using only baseline data. Secondly, we tested whether a model could be validated with a clinical patient dataset to demonstrate broader applicability. RESULTS: We found that a random forest model using only baseline data could accurately predict disease progression for a clinical trial research dataset as well as a population of patients being treated at a tertiary care clinic. The RF Model outperformed a pre‐slope model and was similar to a GLM model in terms of root mean square deviation at early time points. At later time points, the RF Model was far superior to either model. Finally, we found that only the RF Model was unbiased and was less subject to overfitting than either of the other two models when applied to a clinic population. INTERPRETATION: We conclude that the RF Model delivers superior predictions of ALS disease progression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5099532/ /pubmed/27844032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.348 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc on behalf of American Neurological Association. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Taylor, Albert A. Fournier, Christina Polak, Meraida Wang, Liuxia Zach, Neta Keymer, Mike Glass, Jonathan D. Ennist, David L. Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
title | Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
title_full | Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
title_fullStr | Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
title_short | Predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
title_sort | predicting disease progression in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099532/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27844032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.348 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tayloralberta predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT fournierchristina predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT polakmeraida predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT wangliuxia predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT zachneta predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT keymermike predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT glassjonathand predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT ennistdavidl predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis AT predictingdiseaseprogressioninamyotrophiclateralsclerosis |