Cargando…
Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
AIM: In 2006, Omnitrope (by Sandoz) was the first approved biosimilar in Europe. To date, 21 biosimilars for seven different biologics are on the market. The present study compared the clinical trials undertaken to obtain market authorization. METHODS: We summarized the findings of a comprehensive r...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13076 |
_version_ | 1782465985199996928 |
---|---|
author | Mielke, Johanna Jilma, Bernd Koenig, Franz Jones, Byron |
author_facet | Mielke, Johanna Jilma, Bernd Koenig, Franz Jones, Byron |
author_sort | Mielke, Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: In 2006, Omnitrope (by Sandoz) was the first approved biosimilar in Europe. To date, 21 biosimilars for seven different biologics are on the market. The present study compared the clinical trials undertaken to obtain market authorization. METHODS: We summarized the findings of a comprehensive review of all clinical trials up to market authorization of approved biosimilars, using the European public assessment reports (EPARs) published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The features compared were, among others, the number of patients enrolled, the number of trials, the types of trial design, choice of endpoints and equivalence margins for pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) and phase III trials. RESULTS: The variability between the clinical development strategies is high. Some differences are explainable by the characteristics of the product; if, for example, the PD marker can be assumed to predict the clinical outcome, no efficacy trials might be necessary. However, even for products with the same reference product, the sample size, endpoints and statistical models are not always the same. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be flexibility for sponsors regarding the decision as to how best to prove biosimilarity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5099555 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50995552016-11-14 Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review Mielke, Johanna Jilma, Bernd Koenig, Franz Jones, Byron Br J Clin Pharmacol Systematic Reviews AIM: In 2006, Omnitrope (by Sandoz) was the first approved biosimilar in Europe. To date, 21 biosimilars for seven different biologics are on the market. The present study compared the clinical trials undertaken to obtain market authorization. METHODS: We summarized the findings of a comprehensive review of all clinical trials up to market authorization of approved biosimilars, using the European public assessment reports (EPARs) published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The features compared were, among others, the number of patients enrolled, the number of trials, the types of trial design, choice of endpoints and equivalence margins for pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) and phase III trials. RESULTS: The variability between the clinical development strategies is high. Some differences are explainable by the characteristics of the product; if, for example, the PD marker can be assumed to predict the clinical outcome, no efficacy trials might be necessary. However, even for products with the same reference product, the sample size, endpoints and statistical models are not always the same. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be flexibility for sponsors regarding the decision as to how best to prove biosimilarity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-05 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5099555/ /pubmed/27580073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13076 Text en © 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Mielke, Johanna Jilma, Bernd Koenig, Franz Jones, Byron Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review |
title | Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review |
title_full | Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review |
title_short | Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review |
title_sort | clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the european union: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099555/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mielkejohanna clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview AT jilmabernd clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview AT koenigfranz clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview AT jonesbyron clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview |