Cargando…

Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review

AIM: In 2006, Omnitrope (by Sandoz) was the first approved biosimilar in Europe. To date, 21 biosimilars for seven different biologics are on the market. The present study compared the clinical trials undertaken to obtain market authorization. METHODS: We summarized the findings of a comprehensive r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mielke, Johanna, Jilma, Bernd, Koenig, Franz, Jones, Byron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13076
_version_ 1782465985199996928
author Mielke, Johanna
Jilma, Bernd
Koenig, Franz
Jones, Byron
author_facet Mielke, Johanna
Jilma, Bernd
Koenig, Franz
Jones, Byron
author_sort Mielke, Johanna
collection PubMed
description AIM: In 2006, Omnitrope (by Sandoz) was the first approved biosimilar in Europe. To date, 21 biosimilars for seven different biologics are on the market. The present study compared the clinical trials undertaken to obtain market authorization. METHODS: We summarized the findings of a comprehensive review of all clinical trials up to market authorization of approved biosimilars, using the European public assessment reports (EPARs) published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The features compared were, among others, the number of patients enrolled, the number of trials, the types of trial design, choice of endpoints and equivalence margins for pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) and phase III trials. RESULTS: The variability between the clinical development strategies is high. Some differences are explainable by the characteristics of the product; if, for example, the PD marker can be assumed to predict the clinical outcome, no efficacy trials might be necessary. However, even for products with the same reference product, the sample size, endpoints and statistical models are not always the same. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be flexibility for sponsors regarding the decision as to how best to prove biosimilarity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5099555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50995552016-11-14 Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review Mielke, Johanna Jilma, Bernd Koenig, Franz Jones, Byron Br J Clin Pharmacol Systematic Reviews AIM: In 2006, Omnitrope (by Sandoz) was the first approved biosimilar in Europe. To date, 21 biosimilars for seven different biologics are on the market. The present study compared the clinical trials undertaken to obtain market authorization. METHODS: We summarized the findings of a comprehensive review of all clinical trials up to market authorization of approved biosimilars, using the European public assessment reports (EPARs) published by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The features compared were, among others, the number of patients enrolled, the number of trials, the types of trial design, choice of endpoints and equivalence margins for pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) and phase III trials. RESULTS: The variability between the clinical development strategies is high. Some differences are explainable by the characteristics of the product; if, for example, the PD marker can be assumed to predict the clinical outcome, no efficacy trials might be necessary. However, even for products with the same reference product, the sample size, endpoints and statistical models are not always the same. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be flexibility for sponsors regarding the decision as to how best to prove biosimilarity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-09-05 2016-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5099555/ /pubmed/27580073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13076 Text en © 2016 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Mielke, Johanna
Jilma, Bernd
Koenig, Franz
Jones, Byron
Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
title Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
title_full Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
title_fullStr Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
title_short Clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the European Union: a systematic review
title_sort clinical trials for authorized biosimilars in the european union: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5099555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27580073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13076
work_keys_str_mv AT mielkejohanna clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview
AT jilmabernd clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview
AT koenigfranz clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview
AT jonesbyron clinicaltrialsforauthorizedbiosimilarsintheeuropeanunionasystematicreview