Cargando…

The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Fibrinolytic therapy is the main reperfusion therapy for most STEMI patients in several countries. Current practice guidelines recommended routine early pharmacoinvasive (within 3–24 h after successful fibrinolysis, however it cannot be performed in timely fashion due to limitation of PC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chotechuang, Yotsawee, Phrommintikul, Arintaya, Muenpa, Roungtiva, Patumanond, Jayanton, Chaichuen, Tuanchai, Kuanprasert, Srun, Thanachikun, Noparat, Benjanuwatra, Thanawat, Sukonthasarn, Apichard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3
_version_ 1782466067566690304
author Chotechuang, Yotsawee
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Muenpa, Roungtiva
Patumanond, Jayanton
Chaichuen, Tuanchai
Kuanprasert, Srun
Thanachikun, Noparat
Benjanuwatra, Thanawat
Sukonthasarn, Apichard
author_facet Chotechuang, Yotsawee
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Muenpa, Roungtiva
Patumanond, Jayanton
Chaichuen, Tuanchai
Kuanprasert, Srun
Thanachikun, Noparat
Benjanuwatra, Thanawat
Sukonthasarn, Apichard
author_sort Chotechuang, Yotsawee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fibrinolytic therapy is the main reperfusion therapy for most STEMI patients in several countries. Current practice guidelines recommended routine early pharmacoinvasive (within 3–24 h after successful fibrinolysis, however it cannot be performed in timely fashion due to limitation of PCI-capable hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the GRACE score in patients receiving delayed intervention after successful fibrinolysis in non PCI-capable hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data from the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry during the period 2007–2012. The STEMI patients who had successfully fibrionolysis in non PCI-capable hospital and received delayed PCI (during 24 h to 14 days after successful fibrinolytic therapy) at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital were included. The primary end point for this analysis was the composite outcomes, which included all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), re-hospitalization with heart failure (HF) and stroke at 1 and 6-month. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included. 88 patients and 64 patients were in low GRACE group (GRACE risk score ≤ 125) and intermediate to high GRACE group (GRACE risk score above 126), respectively. The median time from fibrinolysis to coronary intervention in low GRACE group was 8.5 days (interquartile range, 4.6–10.9) and 7.9 days (interquartile range,3.2,12.0) in intermediate to high GRACE group (p = 0.482). At 1 month, the composite cardiovascular outcome at 1 month occurred in 2 patients (2.3 %) in low GRACE group and 10 patients (15.6 %) in intermediate to high GRACE group (P = 0.003). During 6 months, the composite cardiovascular outcomes occurred in 6 patients (6.8 %) in low GRACE group and 12 patients (18.7 %) in intermediate to high GRACE group (P = 0.024). The cumulative of composite cardiovascular outcome was significant higher in intermediate to high GRACE group than in low GRACE group (Hazard ratio: 2.97, 95 % CI 1.11–7.90; p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: The long delay pharmacoinvasive strategy in intermediate to high GRACE score after successful fibrinolysis in non PCI-capable facilities were associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes than the patients with low GRACE score at 1 and 6 months. GRACE risk score may be helpful and guided the clinicians in non PCI-capable center in early transferred to early intervention in STEMI patients after fibrinolytic therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51000952016-11-08 The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study Chotechuang, Yotsawee Phrommintikul, Arintaya Muenpa, Roungtiva Patumanond, Jayanton Chaichuen, Tuanchai Kuanprasert, Srun Thanachikun, Noparat Benjanuwatra, Thanawat Sukonthasarn, Apichard BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Fibrinolytic therapy is the main reperfusion therapy for most STEMI patients in several countries. Current practice guidelines recommended routine early pharmacoinvasive (within 3–24 h after successful fibrinolysis, however it cannot be performed in timely fashion due to limitation of PCI-capable hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic utility of the GRACE score in patients receiving delayed intervention after successful fibrinolysis in non PCI-capable hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed the data from the Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry during the period 2007–2012. The STEMI patients who had successfully fibrionolysis in non PCI-capable hospital and received delayed PCI (during 24 h to 14 days after successful fibrinolytic therapy) at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital were included. The primary end point for this analysis was the composite outcomes, which included all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), re-hospitalization with heart failure (HF) and stroke at 1 and 6-month. RESULTS: A total of 152 patients were included. 88 patients and 64 patients were in low GRACE group (GRACE risk score ≤ 125) and intermediate to high GRACE group (GRACE risk score above 126), respectively. The median time from fibrinolysis to coronary intervention in low GRACE group was 8.5 days (interquartile range, 4.6–10.9) and 7.9 days (interquartile range,3.2,12.0) in intermediate to high GRACE group (p = 0.482). At 1 month, the composite cardiovascular outcome at 1 month occurred in 2 patients (2.3 %) in low GRACE group and 10 patients (15.6 %) in intermediate to high GRACE group (P = 0.003). During 6 months, the composite cardiovascular outcomes occurred in 6 patients (6.8 %) in low GRACE group and 12 patients (18.7 %) in intermediate to high GRACE group (P = 0.024). The cumulative of composite cardiovascular outcome was significant higher in intermediate to high GRACE group than in low GRACE group (Hazard ratio: 2.97, 95 % CI 1.11–7.90; p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: The long delay pharmacoinvasive strategy in intermediate to high GRACE score after successful fibrinolysis in non PCI-capable facilities were associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes than the patients with low GRACE score at 1 and 6 months. GRACE risk score may be helpful and guided the clinicians in non PCI-capable center in early transferred to early intervention in STEMI patients after fibrinolytic therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100095/ /pubmed/27821064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chotechuang, Yotsawee
Phrommintikul, Arintaya
Muenpa, Roungtiva
Patumanond, Jayanton
Chaichuen, Tuanchai
Kuanprasert, Srun
Thanachikun, Noparat
Benjanuwatra, Thanawat
Sukonthasarn, Apichard
The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
title The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
title_full The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
title_short The prognostic utility of GRACE risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in STEMI patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non PCI-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort prognostic utility of grace risk score in predictive cardiovascular event rate in stemi patients with successful fibrinolysis and delay intervention in non pci-capable hospital: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0383-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chotechuangyotsawee theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT phrommintikularintaya theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT muenparoungtiva theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT patumanondjayanton theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chaichuentuanchai theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kuanprasertsrun theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT thanachikunnoparat theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT benjanuwatrathanawat theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sukonthasarnapichard theprognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chotechuangyotsawee prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT phrommintikularintaya prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT muenparoungtiva prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT patumanondjayanton prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chaichuentuanchai prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kuanprasertsrun prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT thanachikunnoparat prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT benjanuwatrathanawat prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT sukonthasarnapichard prognosticutilityofgraceriskscoreinpredictivecardiovasculareventrateinstemipatientswithsuccessfulfibrinolysisanddelayinterventioninnonpcicapablehospitalaretrospectivecohortstudy