Cargando…

Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy profile of risperidone and olanzapine were compared in a double-blind trial that used doses widely accepted in clinical practice. METHODS: Subjects (n = 71) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suresh Kumar, P. N., Anish, P. K., Rajmohan, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066010
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.192016
_version_ 1782466074731610112
author Suresh Kumar, P. N.
Anish, P. K.
Rajmohan, V.
author_facet Suresh Kumar, P. N.
Anish, P. K.
Rajmohan, V.
author_sort Suresh Kumar, P. N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy profile of risperidone and olanzapine were compared in a double-blind trial that used doses widely accepted in clinical practice. METHODS: Subjects (n = 71) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive 2–8 mg/day of risperidone (mean modal dose = 5.5 mg/day) or 5–20 mg/day of olanzapine (mean modal dose = 14.4 mg/day) for 1 year. RESULTS: The two study groups were similar at baseline in all aspects. Seventy-four percent of the participants completed the trial, with no between-differences in the proportion of dropouts. Olanzapine group showed significantly greater improvement in negative symptoms in assessments at 3(rd), 6(th), 9(th), and 12(th) months (P = 0.05, 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively). Clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) scores were consistently lower in the olanzapine group at 3(rd), 6(th), and 9(th) months (P = 0.01, 0.03, and 0.05, respectively) as measured by positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS). Total scores on PANSS, positive symptoms, general psychopathology, and CGI improvement showed comparable improvement at 3(rd), 6(th), 9(th), and 12(th) months of follow-up (all subjects, including dropouts). Severity of extrapyramidal symptoms was low in both groups, with no between-group differences. Mean change in body weight, fasting blood sugar, and fasting cholesterol was comparable in both groups. Risperidone group had significant hyperprolactinemia after one year (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were well-tolerated and efficacious. Greater reductions in severity of the illness and negative symptoms were seen with olanzapine consistently through 1 year. The frequency and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms were negligible and similar in the two treatment groups. Weight gain, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia were comparable in both groups. Risperidone produced significant hyperprolactinemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51001242017-01-06 Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia Suresh Kumar, P. N. Anish, P. K. Rajmohan, V. Indian J Psychiatry Original Article OBJECTIVE: The safety and efficacy profile of risperidone and olanzapine were compared in a double-blind trial that used doses widely accepted in clinical practice. METHODS: Subjects (n = 71) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria for schizophrenia were randomly assigned to receive 2–8 mg/day of risperidone (mean modal dose = 5.5 mg/day) or 5–20 mg/day of olanzapine (mean modal dose = 14.4 mg/day) for 1 year. RESULTS: The two study groups were similar at baseline in all aspects. Seventy-four percent of the participants completed the trial, with no between-differences in the proportion of dropouts. Olanzapine group showed significantly greater improvement in negative symptoms in assessments at 3(rd), 6(th), 9(th), and 12(th) months (P = 0.05, 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively). Clinical global impression of severity (CGI-S) scores were consistently lower in the olanzapine group at 3(rd), 6(th), and 9(th) months (P = 0.01, 0.03, and 0.05, respectively) as measured by positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS). Total scores on PANSS, positive symptoms, general psychopathology, and CGI improvement showed comparable improvement at 3(rd), 6(th), 9(th), and 12(th) months of follow-up (all subjects, including dropouts). Severity of extrapyramidal symptoms was low in both groups, with no between-group differences. Mean change in body weight, fasting blood sugar, and fasting cholesterol was comparable in both groups. Risperidone group had significant hyperprolactinemia after one year (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatments were well-tolerated and efficacious. Greater reductions in severity of the illness and negative symptoms were seen with olanzapine consistently through 1 year. The frequency and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms were negligible and similar in the two treatment groups. Weight gain, hyperlipidemia, and hyperglycemia were comparable in both groups. Risperidone produced significant hyperprolactinemia. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5100124/ /pubmed/28066010 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.192016 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Psychiatry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Suresh Kumar, P. N.
Anish, P. K.
Rajmohan, V.
Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
title Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
title_full Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
title_fullStr Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
title_short Olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
title_sort olanzapine has better efficacy compared to risperidone for treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28066010
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.192016
work_keys_str_mv AT sureshkumarpn olanzapinehasbetterefficacycomparedtorisperidonefortreatmentofnegativesymptomsinschizophrenia
AT anishpk olanzapinehasbetterefficacycomparedtorisperidonefortreatmentofnegativesymptomsinschizophrenia
AT rajmohanv olanzapinehasbetterefficacycomparedtorisperidonefortreatmentofnegativesymptomsinschizophrenia