Cargando…

A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is increasing globally resulting in an increased incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes and health system costs. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of NAS prevention and management strategies is very weak and further research initiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Lauren E., Jansson, Lauren M., Moulsdale, Wendy, Pereira, Jodi, Simpson, Sarah, Guttman, Astrid, Allegaert, Karel, Askie, Lisa, Roukema, Henry, Lacaze, Thierry, Davis, Jonathan M., Finnegan, Loretta, Williamson, Paula, Offringa, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1666-9
_version_ 1782466090489610240
author Kelly, Lauren E.
Jansson, Lauren M.
Moulsdale, Wendy
Pereira, Jodi
Simpson, Sarah
Guttman, Astrid
Allegaert, Karel
Askie, Lisa
Roukema, Henry
Lacaze, Thierry
Davis, Jonathan M.
Finnegan, Loretta
Williamson, Paula
Offringa, Martin
author_facet Kelly, Lauren E.
Jansson, Lauren M.
Moulsdale, Wendy
Pereira, Jodi
Simpson, Sarah
Guttman, Astrid
Allegaert, Karel
Askie, Lisa
Roukema, Henry
Lacaze, Thierry
Davis, Jonathan M.
Finnegan, Loretta
Williamson, Paula
Offringa, Martin
author_sort Kelly, Lauren E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is increasing globally resulting in an increased incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes and health system costs. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of NAS prevention and management strategies is very weak and further research initiatives are critically needed to support meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. In NAS research, the choice of outcomes and the use of valid, responsive and feasible measurement instruments are crucial. There is currently no consensus and evidence-based core outcome set (COS) for NAS. METHODS/DESIGN: The development of the NAS-COS will include five stages led by an international Multidisciplinary Steering Committee: (1) qualitative interviews with parents/families and a systematic review (SR) to identify items for inclusion in a COS. The SR will also identify participants for the Delphi survey, (2) a three-round Delphi survey to gain expert opinion on the importance of health outcomes influencing NAS management decisions, (3), a consensus meeting to finalize the items and definitions with experts and COS users, (4) feasibility and pilot testing, development of the COS and explanatory document and (5) implementation planning. DISCUSSION: Since standardized outcome measurement and reporting will improve NAS clinical research consistency, efficacy and impact, this COS will reflect the minimum set of health outcomes which should be measured in trials evaluating interventions for preventing or treating NAS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1666-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51001932016-11-08 A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey Kelly, Lauren E. Jansson, Lauren M. Moulsdale, Wendy Pereira, Jodi Simpson, Sarah Guttman, Astrid Allegaert, Karel Askie, Lisa Roukema, Henry Lacaze, Thierry Davis, Jonathan M. Finnegan, Loretta Williamson, Paula Offringa, Martin Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The prevalence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is increasing globally resulting in an increased incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes and health system costs. Evidence regarding the effectiveness of NAS prevention and management strategies is very weak and further research initiatives are critically needed to support meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines. In NAS research, the choice of outcomes and the use of valid, responsive and feasible measurement instruments are crucial. There is currently no consensus and evidence-based core outcome set (COS) for NAS. METHODS/DESIGN: The development of the NAS-COS will include five stages led by an international Multidisciplinary Steering Committee: (1) qualitative interviews with parents/families and a systematic review (SR) to identify items for inclusion in a COS. The SR will also identify participants for the Delphi survey, (2) a three-round Delphi survey to gain expert opinion on the importance of health outcomes influencing NAS management decisions, (3), a consensus meeting to finalize the items and definitions with experts and COS users, (4) feasibility and pilot testing, development of the COS and explanatory document and (5) implementation planning. DISCUSSION: Since standardized outcome measurement and reporting will improve NAS clinical research consistency, efficacy and impact, this COS will reflect the minimum set of health outcomes which should be measured in trials evaluating interventions for preventing or treating NAS. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1666-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100193/ /pubmed/27821184 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1666-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kelly, Lauren E.
Jansson, Lauren M.
Moulsdale, Wendy
Pereira, Jodi
Simpson, Sarah
Guttman, Astrid
Allegaert, Karel
Askie, Lisa
Roukema, Henry
Lacaze, Thierry
Davis, Jonathan M.
Finnegan, Loretta
Williamson, Paula
Offringa, Martin
A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey
title A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey
title_full A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey
title_fullStr A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey
title_full_unstemmed A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey
title_short A core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a Delphi survey
title_sort core outcome set for neonatal abstinence syndrome: study protocol for a systematic review, parent interviews and a delphi survey
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821184
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1666-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kellylaurene acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT janssonlaurenm acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT moulsdalewendy acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT pereirajodi acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT simpsonsarah acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT guttmanastrid acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT allegaertkarel acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT askielisa acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT roukemahenry acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT lacazethierry acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT davisjonathanm acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT finneganloretta acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT williamsonpaula acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT offringamartin acoreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT kellylaurene coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT janssonlaurenm coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT moulsdalewendy coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT pereirajodi coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT simpsonsarah coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT guttmanastrid coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT allegaertkarel coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT askielisa coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT roukemahenry coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT lacazethierry coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT davisjonathanm coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT finneganloretta coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT williamsonpaula coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey
AT offringamartin coreoutcomesetforneonatalabstinencesyndromestudyprotocolforasystematicreviewparentinterviewsandadelphisurvey