Cargando…

A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Refractory post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is a relatively rare phenomenon that can lead to rapid multi-organ dysfunction syndrome and is almost invariably fatal without advanced mechanical circulatory support (AMCS), namely extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khorsandi, Maziar, Dougherty, Scott, Sinclair, Andrew, Buchan, Keith, MacLennan, Fiona, Bouamra, Omar, Curry, Philip, Zamvar, Vipin, Berg, Geoffrey, Al-Attar, Nawwar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0545-5
_version_ 1782466116948328448
author Khorsandi, Maziar
Dougherty, Scott
Sinclair, Andrew
Buchan, Keith
MacLennan, Fiona
Bouamra, Omar
Curry, Philip
Zamvar, Vipin
Berg, Geoffrey
Al-Attar, Nawwar
author_facet Khorsandi, Maziar
Dougherty, Scott
Sinclair, Andrew
Buchan, Keith
MacLennan, Fiona
Bouamra, Omar
Curry, Philip
Zamvar, Vipin
Berg, Geoffrey
Al-Attar, Nawwar
author_sort Khorsandi, Maziar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refractory post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is a relatively rare phenomenon that can lead to rapid multi-organ dysfunction syndrome and is almost invariably fatal without advanced mechanical circulatory support (AMCS), namely extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventricular assist devices (VAD). In this multicentre observational study we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of salvage venoarterial ECMO (VA ECMO) and VAD for refractory PCCS in the 3 adult cardiothoracic surgery centres in Scotland over a 20-year period. METHODS: The data was obtained through the Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen cardiac surgery databases. Our inclusion criteria included any adult patient from April 1995 to April 2015 who had received salvage VA ECMO or VAD for PCCS refractory to intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and maximal inotropic support following adult cardiac surgery. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients met the inclusion criteria. Age range was 34–83 years (median 51 years). There was a large male predominance (n = 23, 85 %). Overall 23 patients (85 %) received VA ECMO of which 14 (61 %) had central ECMO and 9 (39 %) had peripheral ECMO. Four patients (15 %) were treated with short-term VAD (BiVAD = 1, RVAD = 1 and LVAD = 2). The most common procedure-related complication was major haemorrhage (n = 10). Renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (n = 7), fatal stroke (n = 5), septic shock (n = 2), and a pseudo-aneurysm at the femoral artery cannulation site (n = 1) were also observed. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 40.7 %. All survivors were NYHA class I-II at 12 months’ follow-up. CONCLUSION: AMCS for refractory PCCS carries a survival benefit and achieves acceptable functional recovery despite a significant complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51003112016-11-08 A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery Khorsandi, Maziar Dougherty, Scott Sinclair, Andrew Buchan, Keith MacLennan, Fiona Bouamra, Omar Curry, Philip Zamvar, Vipin Berg, Geoffrey Al-Attar, Nawwar J Cardiothorac Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Refractory post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is a relatively rare phenomenon that can lead to rapid multi-organ dysfunction syndrome and is almost invariably fatal without advanced mechanical circulatory support (AMCS), namely extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or ventricular assist devices (VAD). In this multicentre observational study we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of salvage venoarterial ECMO (VA ECMO) and VAD for refractory PCCS in the 3 adult cardiothoracic surgery centres in Scotland over a 20-year period. METHODS: The data was obtained through the Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen cardiac surgery databases. Our inclusion criteria included any adult patient from April 1995 to April 2015 who had received salvage VA ECMO or VAD for PCCS refractory to intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and maximal inotropic support following adult cardiac surgery. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients met the inclusion criteria. Age range was 34–83 years (median 51 years). There was a large male predominance (n = 23, 85 %). Overall 23 patients (85 %) received VA ECMO of which 14 (61 %) had central ECMO and 9 (39 %) had peripheral ECMO. Four patients (15 %) were treated with short-term VAD (BiVAD = 1, RVAD = 1 and LVAD = 2). The most common procedure-related complication was major haemorrhage (n = 10). Renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy (n = 7), fatal stroke (n = 5), septic shock (n = 2), and a pseudo-aneurysm at the femoral artery cannulation site (n = 1) were also observed. Overall survival to hospital discharge was 40.7 %. All survivors were NYHA class I-II at 12 months’ follow-up. CONCLUSION: AMCS for refractory PCCS carries a survival benefit and achieves acceptable functional recovery despite a significant complication rate. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100311/ /pubmed/27821152 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0545-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Khorsandi, Maziar
Dougherty, Scott
Sinclair, Andrew
Buchan, Keith
MacLennan, Fiona
Bouamra, Omar
Curry, Philip
Zamvar, Vipin
Berg, Geoffrey
Al-Attar, Nawwar
A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
title A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
title_full A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
title_fullStr A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
title_full_unstemmed A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
title_short A 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
title_sort 20-year multicentre outcome analysis of salvage mechanical circulatory support for refractory cardiogenic shock after cardiac surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821152
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0545-5
work_keys_str_mv AT khorsandimaziar a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT doughertyscott a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT sinclairandrew a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT buchankeith a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT maclennanfiona a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT bouamraomar a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT curryphilip a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT zamvarvipin a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT berggeoffrey a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT alattarnawwar a20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT khorsandimaziar 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT doughertyscott 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT sinclairandrew 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT buchankeith 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT maclennanfiona 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT bouamraomar 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT curryphilip 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT zamvarvipin 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT berggeoffrey 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery
AT alattarnawwar 20yearmulticentreoutcomeanalysisofsalvagemechanicalcirculatorysupportforrefractorycardiogenicshockaftercardiacsurgery