Cargando…
Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
BACKGROUND: Quantifying gametocyte densities in natural malaria infections is important to estimate malaria transmission potential. Two molecular methods (Pfs25 mRNA quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and Pfs25 mRNA quantitative nucleic acid sequence based amplification (QT-NASBA)) are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z |
_version_ | 1782466117179015168 |
---|---|
author | Pett, Helmi Gonçalves, Bronner P. Dicko, Alassane Nébié, Issa Tiono, Alfred B. Lanke, Kjerstin Bradley, John Chen, Ingrid Diawara, Halimatou Mahamar, Almahamoudou Soumare, Harouna M. Traore, Sekou F. Baber, Ibrahima Sirima, Sodiomon B. Sauerwein, Robert Brown, Joelle Gosling, Roly Felger, Ingrid Drakeley, Chris Bousema, Teun |
author_facet | Pett, Helmi Gonçalves, Bronner P. Dicko, Alassane Nébié, Issa Tiono, Alfred B. Lanke, Kjerstin Bradley, John Chen, Ingrid Diawara, Halimatou Mahamar, Almahamoudou Soumare, Harouna M. Traore, Sekou F. Baber, Ibrahima Sirima, Sodiomon B. Sauerwein, Robert Brown, Joelle Gosling, Roly Felger, Ingrid Drakeley, Chris Bousema, Teun |
author_sort | Pett, Helmi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Quantifying gametocyte densities in natural malaria infections is important to estimate malaria transmission potential. Two molecular methods (Pfs25 mRNA quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and Pfs25 mRNA quantitative nucleic acid sequence based amplification (QT-NASBA)) are commonly used to determine gametocyte densities in clinical and epidemiological studies and allow gametocyte detection at densities below the microscopic threshold for detection. Here, reproducibility of these measurements and the association between estimated gametocyte densities and mosquito infection rates were compared. METHODS: To quantify intra- and inter-assay variation of QT-NASBA and qRT-PCR, a series of experiments was performed using culture-derived mature Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from three different parasite isolates (NF54, NF135, NF166). Pfs25 mRNA levels were also determined in samples from clinical trials in Mali and Burkina Faso using both methods. Agreement between the two methods and association with mosquito infection rates in membrane feeding assays were assessed. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-assay variability was larger in QT-NASBA compared to qRT-PCR, particularly at low gametocyte densities (< 1 gametocyte per μL). Logistic models, including log-transformed gametocytaemia estimated by QT-NASBA, explained variability in mosquito feeding experiment results as well as log-transformed gametocytaemia by qRT-PCR (marginal R(2) 0.28 and 0.22, respectively). Densities determined by both methods strongly correlated with mosquito infection rates [Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, 0.59 for qRT-PCR and 0.64 for QT-NASBA (P < 0.001 for both)]. Gametocyte densities estimated by qRT-PCR were higher than levels estimated by QT-NASBA or light microscopy at high densities (>100 gametocyte per μL). Samples collected in one of the two transmission studies had extremely low gametocyte densities by both molecular methods, which is suggestive of RNA degradation due to an unknown number of freeze–thaw cycles and illustrates the reliance of molecular gametocyte diagnostics on a reliable cold-chain. CONCLUSIONS: The experiments indicate that both qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA are of value for quantifying mature gametocytes in samples collected in field studies. For both assays, estimated gametocyte densities correlated well with mosquito infection rates. QT-NASBA is less reproducible than qRT-PCR, particularly for low gametocyte densities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5100312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51003122016-11-08 Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity Pett, Helmi Gonçalves, Bronner P. Dicko, Alassane Nébié, Issa Tiono, Alfred B. Lanke, Kjerstin Bradley, John Chen, Ingrid Diawara, Halimatou Mahamar, Almahamoudou Soumare, Harouna M. Traore, Sekou F. Baber, Ibrahima Sirima, Sodiomon B. Sauerwein, Robert Brown, Joelle Gosling, Roly Felger, Ingrid Drakeley, Chris Bousema, Teun Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Quantifying gametocyte densities in natural malaria infections is important to estimate malaria transmission potential. Two molecular methods (Pfs25 mRNA quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and Pfs25 mRNA quantitative nucleic acid sequence based amplification (QT-NASBA)) are commonly used to determine gametocyte densities in clinical and epidemiological studies and allow gametocyte detection at densities below the microscopic threshold for detection. Here, reproducibility of these measurements and the association between estimated gametocyte densities and mosquito infection rates were compared. METHODS: To quantify intra- and inter-assay variation of QT-NASBA and qRT-PCR, a series of experiments was performed using culture-derived mature Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from three different parasite isolates (NF54, NF135, NF166). Pfs25 mRNA levels were also determined in samples from clinical trials in Mali and Burkina Faso using both methods. Agreement between the two methods and association with mosquito infection rates in membrane feeding assays were assessed. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-assay variability was larger in QT-NASBA compared to qRT-PCR, particularly at low gametocyte densities (< 1 gametocyte per μL). Logistic models, including log-transformed gametocytaemia estimated by QT-NASBA, explained variability in mosquito feeding experiment results as well as log-transformed gametocytaemia by qRT-PCR (marginal R(2) 0.28 and 0.22, respectively). Densities determined by both methods strongly correlated with mosquito infection rates [Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, 0.59 for qRT-PCR and 0.64 for QT-NASBA (P < 0.001 for both)]. Gametocyte densities estimated by qRT-PCR were higher than levels estimated by QT-NASBA or light microscopy at high densities (>100 gametocyte per μL). Samples collected in one of the two transmission studies had extremely low gametocyte densities by both molecular methods, which is suggestive of RNA degradation due to an unknown number of freeze–thaw cycles and illustrates the reliance of molecular gametocyte diagnostics on a reliable cold-chain. CONCLUSIONS: The experiments indicate that both qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA are of value for quantifying mature gametocytes in samples collected in field studies. For both assays, estimated gametocyte densities correlated well with mosquito infection rates. QT-NASBA is less reproducible than qRT-PCR, particularly for low gametocyte densities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100312/ /pubmed/27821171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Pett, Helmi Gonçalves, Bronner P. Dicko, Alassane Nébié, Issa Tiono, Alfred B. Lanke, Kjerstin Bradley, John Chen, Ingrid Diawara, Halimatou Mahamar, Almahamoudou Soumare, Harouna M. Traore, Sekou F. Baber, Ibrahima Sirima, Sodiomon B. Sauerwein, Robert Brown, Joelle Gosling, Roly Felger, Ingrid Drakeley, Chris Bousema, Teun Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity |
title | Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity |
title_full | Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity |
title_fullStr | Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity |
title_short | Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity |
title_sort | comparison of molecular quantification of plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by pfs25 qrt-pcr and qt-nasba in relation to mosquito infectivity |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petthelmi comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT goncalvesbronnerp comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT dickoalassane comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT nebieissa comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT tionoalfredb comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT lankekjerstin comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT bradleyjohn comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT cheningrid comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT diawarahalimatou comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT mahamaralmahamoudou comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT soumareharounam comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT traoresekouf comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT baberibrahima comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT sirimasodiomonb comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT sauerweinrobert comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT brownjoelle comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT goslingroly comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT felgeringrid comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT drakeleychris comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity AT bousemateun comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity |