Cargando…

Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity

BACKGROUND: Quantifying gametocyte densities in natural malaria infections is important to estimate malaria transmission potential. Two molecular methods (Pfs25 mRNA quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and Pfs25 mRNA quantitative nucleic acid sequence based amplification (QT-NASBA)) are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pett, Helmi, Gonçalves, Bronner P., Dicko, Alassane, Nébié, Issa, Tiono, Alfred B., Lanke, Kjerstin, Bradley, John, Chen, Ingrid, Diawara, Halimatou, Mahamar, Almahamoudou, Soumare, Harouna M., Traore, Sekou F., Baber, Ibrahima, Sirima, Sodiomon B., Sauerwein, Robert, Brown, Joelle, Gosling, Roly, Felger, Ingrid, Drakeley, Chris, Bousema, Teun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z
_version_ 1782466117179015168
author Pett, Helmi
Gonçalves, Bronner P.
Dicko, Alassane
Nébié, Issa
Tiono, Alfred B.
Lanke, Kjerstin
Bradley, John
Chen, Ingrid
Diawara, Halimatou
Mahamar, Almahamoudou
Soumare, Harouna M.
Traore, Sekou F.
Baber, Ibrahima
Sirima, Sodiomon B.
Sauerwein, Robert
Brown, Joelle
Gosling, Roly
Felger, Ingrid
Drakeley, Chris
Bousema, Teun
author_facet Pett, Helmi
Gonçalves, Bronner P.
Dicko, Alassane
Nébié, Issa
Tiono, Alfred B.
Lanke, Kjerstin
Bradley, John
Chen, Ingrid
Diawara, Halimatou
Mahamar, Almahamoudou
Soumare, Harouna M.
Traore, Sekou F.
Baber, Ibrahima
Sirima, Sodiomon B.
Sauerwein, Robert
Brown, Joelle
Gosling, Roly
Felger, Ingrid
Drakeley, Chris
Bousema, Teun
author_sort Pett, Helmi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Quantifying gametocyte densities in natural malaria infections is important to estimate malaria transmission potential. Two molecular methods (Pfs25 mRNA quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and Pfs25 mRNA quantitative nucleic acid sequence based amplification (QT-NASBA)) are commonly used to determine gametocyte densities in clinical and epidemiological studies and allow gametocyte detection at densities below the microscopic threshold for detection. Here, reproducibility of these measurements and the association between estimated gametocyte densities and mosquito infection rates were compared. METHODS: To quantify intra- and inter-assay variation of QT-NASBA and qRT-PCR, a series of experiments was performed using culture-derived mature Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from three different parasite isolates (NF54, NF135, NF166). Pfs25 mRNA levels were also determined in samples from clinical trials in Mali and Burkina Faso using both methods. Agreement between the two methods and association with mosquito infection rates in membrane feeding assays were assessed. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-assay variability was larger in QT-NASBA compared to qRT-PCR, particularly at low gametocyte densities (< 1 gametocyte per μL). Logistic models, including log-transformed gametocytaemia estimated by QT-NASBA, explained variability in mosquito feeding experiment results as well as log-transformed gametocytaemia by qRT-PCR (marginal R(2) 0.28 and 0.22, respectively). Densities determined by both methods strongly correlated with mosquito infection rates [Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, 0.59 for qRT-PCR and 0.64 for QT-NASBA (P < 0.001 for both)]. Gametocyte densities estimated by qRT-PCR were higher than levels estimated by QT-NASBA or light microscopy at high densities (>100 gametocyte per μL). Samples collected in one of the two transmission studies had extremely low gametocyte densities by both molecular methods, which is suggestive of RNA degradation due to an unknown number of freeze–thaw cycles and illustrates the reliance of molecular gametocyte diagnostics on a reliable cold-chain. CONCLUSIONS: The experiments indicate that both qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA are of value for quantifying mature gametocytes in samples collected in field studies. For both assays, estimated gametocyte densities correlated well with mosquito infection rates. QT-NASBA is less reproducible than qRT-PCR, particularly for low gametocyte densities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51003122016-11-08 Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity Pett, Helmi Gonçalves, Bronner P. Dicko, Alassane Nébié, Issa Tiono, Alfred B. Lanke, Kjerstin Bradley, John Chen, Ingrid Diawara, Halimatou Mahamar, Almahamoudou Soumare, Harouna M. Traore, Sekou F. Baber, Ibrahima Sirima, Sodiomon B. Sauerwein, Robert Brown, Joelle Gosling, Roly Felger, Ingrid Drakeley, Chris Bousema, Teun Malar J Methodology BACKGROUND: Quantifying gametocyte densities in natural malaria infections is important to estimate malaria transmission potential. Two molecular methods (Pfs25 mRNA quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) and Pfs25 mRNA quantitative nucleic acid sequence based amplification (QT-NASBA)) are commonly used to determine gametocyte densities in clinical and epidemiological studies and allow gametocyte detection at densities below the microscopic threshold for detection. Here, reproducibility of these measurements and the association between estimated gametocyte densities and mosquito infection rates were compared. METHODS: To quantify intra- and inter-assay variation of QT-NASBA and qRT-PCR, a series of experiments was performed using culture-derived mature Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes from three different parasite isolates (NF54, NF135, NF166). Pfs25 mRNA levels were also determined in samples from clinical trials in Mali and Burkina Faso using both methods. Agreement between the two methods and association with mosquito infection rates in membrane feeding assays were assessed. RESULTS: Intra- and inter-assay variability was larger in QT-NASBA compared to qRT-PCR, particularly at low gametocyte densities (< 1 gametocyte per μL). Logistic models, including log-transformed gametocytaemia estimated by QT-NASBA, explained variability in mosquito feeding experiment results as well as log-transformed gametocytaemia by qRT-PCR (marginal R(2) 0.28 and 0.22, respectively). Densities determined by both methods strongly correlated with mosquito infection rates [Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, 0.59 for qRT-PCR and 0.64 for QT-NASBA (P < 0.001 for both)]. Gametocyte densities estimated by qRT-PCR were higher than levels estimated by QT-NASBA or light microscopy at high densities (>100 gametocyte per μL). Samples collected in one of the two transmission studies had extremely low gametocyte densities by both molecular methods, which is suggestive of RNA degradation due to an unknown number of freeze–thaw cycles and illustrates the reliance of molecular gametocyte diagnostics on a reliable cold-chain. CONCLUSIONS: The experiments indicate that both qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA are of value for quantifying mature gametocytes in samples collected in field studies. For both assays, estimated gametocyte densities correlated well with mosquito infection rates. QT-NASBA is less reproducible than qRT-PCR, particularly for low gametocyte densities. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100312/ /pubmed/27821171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Pett, Helmi
Gonçalves, Bronner P.
Dicko, Alassane
Nébié, Issa
Tiono, Alfred B.
Lanke, Kjerstin
Bradley, John
Chen, Ingrid
Diawara, Halimatou
Mahamar, Almahamoudou
Soumare, Harouna M.
Traore, Sekou F.
Baber, Ibrahima
Sirima, Sodiomon B.
Sauerwein, Robert
Brown, Joelle
Gosling, Roly
Felger, Ingrid
Drakeley, Chris
Bousema, Teun
Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
title Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
title_full Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
title_fullStr Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
title_short Comparison of molecular quantification of Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by Pfs25 qRT-PCR and QT-NASBA in relation to mosquito infectivity
title_sort comparison of molecular quantification of plasmodium falciparum gametocytes by pfs25 qrt-pcr and qt-nasba in relation to mosquito infectivity
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27821171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-016-1584-z
work_keys_str_mv AT petthelmi comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT goncalvesbronnerp comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT dickoalassane comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT nebieissa comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT tionoalfredb comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT lankekjerstin comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT bradleyjohn comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT cheningrid comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT diawarahalimatou comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT mahamaralmahamoudou comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT soumareharounam comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT traoresekouf comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT baberibrahima comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT sirimasodiomonb comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT sauerweinrobert comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT brownjoelle comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT goslingroly comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT felgeringrid comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT drakeleychris comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity
AT bousemateun comparisonofmolecularquantificationofplasmodiumfalciparumgametocytesbypfs25qrtpcrandqtnasbainrelationtomosquitoinfectivity