Cargando…

Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems

OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bektaş, Özlen, Üner, Ayşegül, Eliaçık, Eylem, Uz, Burak, Işık, Ayşe, Etgül, Sezgin, Bozkurt, Süreyya, Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin, Göker, Hakan, Sayınalp, Nilgün, Aksu, Salih, Demiroğlu, Haluk, Özcebe, Osman İlhami, Büyükaşık, Yahya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2014.0455
_version_ 1782466192848453632
author Bektaş, Özlen
Üner, Ayşegül
Eliaçık, Eylem
Uz, Burak
Işık, Ayşe
Etgül, Sezgin
Bozkurt, Süreyya
Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin
Göker, Hakan
Sayınalp, Nilgün
Aksu, Salih
Demiroğlu, Haluk
Özcebe, Osman İlhami
Büyükaşık, Yahya
author_facet Bektaş, Özlen
Üner, Ayşegül
Eliaçık, Eylem
Uz, Burak
Işık, Ayşe
Etgül, Sezgin
Bozkurt, Süreyya
Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin
Göker, Hakan
Sayınalp, Nilgün
Aksu, Salih
Demiroğlu, Haluk
Özcebe, Osman İlhami
Büyükaşık, Yahya
author_sort Bektaş, Özlen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the different prognostic scoring systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients who were diagnosed with primary MDS in 2003-2011 in a tertiary care university hospital’s hematology department were included in the study. RESULTS: As the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), World Health Organization Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MPSS), and revised IPSS (IPSS-R) risk categories increased, leukemia-free survival and overall survival decreased (p<0.001). When the IPSS, WPSS, MPSS, and IPSS-R prognostic systems were compared by Cox regression analysis, the WPSS was the best in predicting leukemia-free survival (p<0.001), and the WPSS (p<0.001) and IPSS-R (p=0.037) were better in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSION: All 4 prognostic systems were successful in predicting overall survival and leukemia-free survival (p<0.001). The WPSS was found to be the best predictor for leukemia-free survival, while the WPSS and IPSS-R were found to be the best predictors for overall survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51007222016-11-15 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems Bektaş, Özlen Üner, Ayşegül Eliaçık, Eylem Uz, Burak Işık, Ayşe Etgül, Sezgin Bozkurt, Süreyya Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin Göker, Hakan Sayınalp, Nilgün Aksu, Salih Demiroğlu, Haluk Özcebe, Osman İlhami Büyükaşık, Yahya Turk J Haematol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the different prognostic scoring systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients who were diagnosed with primary MDS in 2003-2011 in a tertiary care university hospital’s hematology department were included in the study. RESULTS: As the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), World Health Organization Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MPSS), and revised IPSS (IPSS-R) risk categories increased, leukemia-free survival and overall survival decreased (p<0.001). When the IPSS, WPSS, MPSS, and IPSS-R prognostic systems were compared by Cox regression analysis, the WPSS was the best in predicting leukemia-free survival (p<0.001), and the WPSS (p<0.001) and IPSS-R (p=0.037) were better in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSION: All 4 prognostic systems were successful in predicting overall survival and leukemia-free survival (p<0.001). The WPSS was found to be the best predictor for leukemia-free survival, while the WPSS and IPSS-R were found to be the best predictors for overall survival. Galenos Publishing 2016-06 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5100722/ /pubmed/26376664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2014.0455 Text en © Turkish Journal of Hematology, Published by Galenos Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bektaş, Özlen
Üner, Ayşegül
Eliaçık, Eylem
Uz, Burak
Işık, Ayşe
Etgül, Sezgin
Bozkurt, Süreyya
Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin
Göker, Hakan
Sayınalp, Nilgün
Aksu, Salih
Demiroğlu, Haluk
Özcebe, Osman İlhami
Büyükaşık, Yahya
Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
title Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
title_full Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
title_fullStr Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
title_short Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
title_sort comparison of myelodysplastic syndrome prognostic scoring systems
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2014.0455
work_keys_str_mv AT bektasozlen comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT uneraysegul comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT eliacıkeylem comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT uzburak comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT isıkayse comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT etgulsezgin comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT bozkurtsureyya comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT haznedarogluibrahimcelalettin comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT gokerhakan comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT sayınalpnilgun comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT aksusalih comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT demirogluhaluk comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT ozcebeosmanilhami comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems
AT buyukasıkyahya comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems