Cargando…
Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems
OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the differ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2014.0455 |
_version_ | 1782466192848453632 |
---|---|
author | Bektaş, Özlen Üner, Ayşegül Eliaçık, Eylem Uz, Burak Işık, Ayşe Etgül, Sezgin Bozkurt, Süreyya Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin Göker, Hakan Sayınalp, Nilgün Aksu, Salih Demiroğlu, Haluk Özcebe, Osman İlhami Büyükaşık, Yahya |
author_facet | Bektaş, Özlen Üner, Ayşegül Eliaçık, Eylem Uz, Burak Işık, Ayşe Etgül, Sezgin Bozkurt, Süreyya Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin Göker, Hakan Sayınalp, Nilgün Aksu, Salih Demiroğlu, Haluk Özcebe, Osman İlhami Büyükaşık, Yahya |
author_sort | Bektaş, Özlen |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the different prognostic scoring systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients who were diagnosed with primary MDS in 2003-2011 in a tertiary care university hospital’s hematology department were included in the study. RESULTS: As the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), World Health Organization Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MPSS), and revised IPSS (IPSS-R) risk categories increased, leukemia-free survival and overall survival decreased (p<0.001). When the IPSS, WPSS, MPSS, and IPSS-R prognostic systems were compared by Cox regression analysis, the WPSS was the best in predicting leukemia-free survival (p<0.001), and the WPSS (p<0.001) and IPSS-R (p=0.037) were better in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSION: All 4 prognostic systems were successful in predicting overall survival and leukemia-free survival (p<0.001). The WPSS was found to be the best predictor for leukemia-free survival, while the WPSS and IPSS-R were found to be the best predictors for overall survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5100722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51007222016-11-15 Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems Bektaş, Özlen Üner, Ayşegül Eliaçık, Eylem Uz, Burak Işık, Ayşe Etgül, Sezgin Bozkurt, Süreyya Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin Göker, Hakan Sayınalp, Nilgün Aksu, Salih Demiroğlu, Haluk Özcebe, Osman İlhami Büyükaşık, Yahya Turk J Haematol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disease. Patients are at risk of developing cytopenias or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Different classifications and prognostic scoring systems have been developed. The aim of this study was to compare the different prognostic scoring systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients who were diagnosed with primary MDS in 2003-2011 in a tertiary care university hospital’s hematology department were included in the study. RESULTS: As the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS), World Health Organization Classification-Based Prognostic Scoring System (WPSS), MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System (MPSS), and revised IPSS (IPSS-R) risk categories increased, leukemia-free survival and overall survival decreased (p<0.001). When the IPSS, WPSS, MPSS, and IPSS-R prognostic systems were compared by Cox regression analysis, the WPSS was the best in predicting leukemia-free survival (p<0.001), and the WPSS (p<0.001) and IPSS-R (p=0.037) were better in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSION: All 4 prognostic systems were successful in predicting overall survival and leukemia-free survival (p<0.001). The WPSS was found to be the best predictor for leukemia-free survival, while the WPSS and IPSS-R were found to be the best predictors for overall survival. Galenos Publishing 2016-06 2016-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5100722/ /pubmed/26376664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2014.0455 Text en © Turkish Journal of Hematology, Published by Galenos Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bektaş, Özlen Üner, Ayşegül Eliaçık, Eylem Uz, Burak Işık, Ayşe Etgül, Sezgin Bozkurt, Süreyya Haznedaroğlu, İbrahim Celalettin Göker, Hakan Sayınalp, Nilgün Aksu, Salih Demiroğlu, Haluk Özcebe, Osman İlhami Büyükaşık, Yahya Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems |
title | Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems |
title_full | Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems |
title_short | Comparison of Myelodysplastic Syndrome Prognostic Scoring Systems |
title_sort | comparison of myelodysplastic syndrome prognostic scoring systems |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26376664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2014.0455 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bektasozlen comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT uneraysegul comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT eliacıkeylem comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT uzburak comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT isıkayse comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT etgulsezgin comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT bozkurtsureyya comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT haznedarogluibrahimcelalettin comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT gokerhakan comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT sayınalpnilgun comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT aksusalih comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT demirogluhaluk comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT ozcebeosmanilhami comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems AT buyukasıkyahya comparisonofmyelodysplasticsyndromeprognosticscoringsystems |