Cargando…

Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select

PURPOSE: Effective standardization of medical device labels requires objective study of varied designs. Insufficient empirical evidence exists regarding how practitioners utilize and view labeling. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of graphic elements (boxing information, grouping information, symbol us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bix, Laura, Seo, Do Chan, Ladoni, Moslem, Brunk, Eric, Becker, Mark W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27824873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165002
_version_ 1782466222458142720
author Bix, Laura
Seo, Do Chan
Ladoni, Moslem
Brunk, Eric
Becker, Mark W.
author_facet Bix, Laura
Seo, Do Chan
Ladoni, Moslem
Brunk, Eric
Becker, Mark W.
author_sort Bix, Laura
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Effective standardization of medical device labels requires objective study of varied designs. Insufficient empirical evidence exists regarding how practitioners utilize and view labeling. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of graphic elements (boxing information, grouping information, symbol use and color-coding) to optimize a label for comparison with those typical of commercial medical devices. DESIGN: Participants viewed 54 trials on a computer screen. Trials were comprised of two labels that were identical with regard to graphics, but differed in one aspect of information (e.g., one had latex, the other did not). Participants were instructed to select the label along a given criteria (e.g., latex containing) as quickly as possible. Dependent variables were binary (correct selection) and continuous (time to correct selection). PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine healthcare professionals were recruited at Association of Surgical Technologists (AST) conferences, and using a targeted e-mail of AST members. RESULTS: Symbol presence, color coding and grouping critical pieces of information all significantly improved selection rates and sped time to correct selection (α = 0.05). Conversely, when critical information was graphically boxed, probability of correct selection and time to selection were impaired (α = 0.05). Subsequently, responses from trials containing optimal treatments (color coded, critical information grouped with symbols) were compared to two labels created based on a review of those commercially available. Optimal labels yielded a significant positive benefit regarding the probability of correct choice ((P<0.0001) LSM; UCL, LCL: 97.3%; 98.4%, 95.5%)), as compared to the two labels we created based on commercial designs (92.0%; 94.7%, 87.9% and 89.8%; 93.0%, 85.3%) and time to selection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data regarding design factors, namely: color coding, symbol use and grouping of critical information that can be used to significantly enhance the performance of medical device labels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5100952
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51009522016-11-18 Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select Bix, Laura Seo, Do Chan Ladoni, Moslem Brunk, Eric Becker, Mark W. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Effective standardization of medical device labels requires objective study of varied designs. Insufficient empirical evidence exists regarding how practitioners utilize and view labeling. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of graphic elements (boxing information, grouping information, symbol use and color-coding) to optimize a label for comparison with those typical of commercial medical devices. DESIGN: Participants viewed 54 trials on a computer screen. Trials were comprised of two labels that were identical with regard to graphics, but differed in one aspect of information (e.g., one had latex, the other did not). Participants were instructed to select the label along a given criteria (e.g., latex containing) as quickly as possible. Dependent variables were binary (correct selection) and continuous (time to correct selection). PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine healthcare professionals were recruited at Association of Surgical Technologists (AST) conferences, and using a targeted e-mail of AST members. RESULTS: Symbol presence, color coding and grouping critical pieces of information all significantly improved selection rates and sped time to correct selection (α = 0.05). Conversely, when critical information was graphically boxed, probability of correct selection and time to selection were impaired (α = 0.05). Subsequently, responses from trials containing optimal treatments (color coded, critical information grouped with symbols) were compared to two labels created based on a review of those commercially available. Optimal labels yielded a significant positive benefit regarding the probability of correct choice ((P<0.0001) LSM; UCL, LCL: 97.3%; 98.4%, 95.5%)), as compared to the two labels we created based on commercial designs (92.0%; 94.7%, 87.9% and 89.8%; 93.0%, 85.3%) and time to selection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data regarding design factors, namely: color coding, symbol use and grouping of critical information that can be used to significantly enhance the performance of medical device labels. Public Library of Science 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100952/ /pubmed/27824873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165002 Text en © 2016 Bix et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bix, Laura
Seo, Do Chan
Ladoni, Moslem
Brunk, Eric
Becker, Mark W.
Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
title Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
title_full Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
title_fullStr Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
title_short Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
title_sort evaluating varied label designs for use with medical devices: optimized labels outperform existing labels in the correct selection of devices and time to select
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100952/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27824873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165002
work_keys_str_mv AT bixlaura evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect
AT seodochan evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect
AT ladonimoslem evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect
AT brunkeric evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect
AT beckermarkw evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect