Cargando…
Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select
PURPOSE: Effective standardization of medical device labels requires objective study of varied designs. Insufficient empirical evidence exists regarding how practitioners utilize and view labeling. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of graphic elements (boxing information, grouping information, symbol us...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27824873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165002 |
_version_ | 1782466222458142720 |
---|---|
author | Bix, Laura Seo, Do Chan Ladoni, Moslem Brunk, Eric Becker, Mark W. |
author_facet | Bix, Laura Seo, Do Chan Ladoni, Moslem Brunk, Eric Becker, Mark W. |
author_sort | Bix, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Effective standardization of medical device labels requires objective study of varied designs. Insufficient empirical evidence exists regarding how practitioners utilize and view labeling. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of graphic elements (boxing information, grouping information, symbol use and color-coding) to optimize a label for comparison with those typical of commercial medical devices. DESIGN: Participants viewed 54 trials on a computer screen. Trials were comprised of two labels that were identical with regard to graphics, but differed in one aspect of information (e.g., one had latex, the other did not). Participants were instructed to select the label along a given criteria (e.g., latex containing) as quickly as possible. Dependent variables were binary (correct selection) and continuous (time to correct selection). PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine healthcare professionals were recruited at Association of Surgical Technologists (AST) conferences, and using a targeted e-mail of AST members. RESULTS: Symbol presence, color coding and grouping critical pieces of information all significantly improved selection rates and sped time to correct selection (α = 0.05). Conversely, when critical information was graphically boxed, probability of correct selection and time to selection were impaired (α = 0.05). Subsequently, responses from trials containing optimal treatments (color coded, critical information grouped with symbols) were compared to two labels created based on a review of those commercially available. Optimal labels yielded a significant positive benefit regarding the probability of correct choice ((P<0.0001) LSM; UCL, LCL: 97.3%; 98.4%, 95.5%)), as compared to the two labels we created based on commercial designs (92.0%; 94.7%, 87.9% and 89.8%; 93.0%, 85.3%) and time to selection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data regarding design factors, namely: color coding, symbol use and grouping of critical information that can be used to significantly enhance the performance of medical device labels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5100952 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51009522016-11-18 Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select Bix, Laura Seo, Do Chan Ladoni, Moslem Brunk, Eric Becker, Mark W. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: Effective standardization of medical device labels requires objective study of varied designs. Insufficient empirical evidence exists regarding how practitioners utilize and view labeling. OBJECTIVE: Measure the effect of graphic elements (boxing information, grouping information, symbol use and color-coding) to optimize a label for comparison with those typical of commercial medical devices. DESIGN: Participants viewed 54 trials on a computer screen. Trials were comprised of two labels that were identical with regard to graphics, but differed in one aspect of information (e.g., one had latex, the other did not). Participants were instructed to select the label along a given criteria (e.g., latex containing) as quickly as possible. Dependent variables were binary (correct selection) and continuous (time to correct selection). PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-nine healthcare professionals were recruited at Association of Surgical Technologists (AST) conferences, and using a targeted e-mail of AST members. RESULTS: Symbol presence, color coding and grouping critical pieces of information all significantly improved selection rates and sped time to correct selection (α = 0.05). Conversely, when critical information was graphically boxed, probability of correct selection and time to selection were impaired (α = 0.05). Subsequently, responses from trials containing optimal treatments (color coded, critical information grouped with symbols) were compared to two labels created based on a review of those commercially available. Optimal labels yielded a significant positive benefit regarding the probability of correct choice ((P<0.0001) LSM; UCL, LCL: 97.3%; 98.4%, 95.5%)), as compared to the two labels we created based on commercial designs (92.0%; 94.7%, 87.9% and 89.8%; 93.0%, 85.3%) and time to selection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data regarding design factors, namely: color coding, symbol use and grouping of critical information that can be used to significantly enhance the performance of medical device labels. Public Library of Science 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5100952/ /pubmed/27824873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165002 Text en © 2016 Bix et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bix, Laura Seo, Do Chan Ladoni, Moslem Brunk, Eric Becker, Mark W. Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select |
title | Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select |
title_full | Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select |
title_short | Evaluating Varied Label Designs for Use with Medical Devices: Optimized Labels Outperform Existing Labels in the Correct Selection of Devices and Time to Select |
title_sort | evaluating varied label designs for use with medical devices: optimized labels outperform existing labels in the correct selection of devices and time to select |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5100952/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27824873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bixlaura evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect AT seodochan evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect AT ladonimoslem evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect AT brunkeric evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect AT beckermarkw evaluatingvariedlabeldesignsforusewithmedicaldevicesoptimizedlabelsoutperformexistinglabelsinthecorrectselectionofdevicesandtimetoselect |