Cargando…

HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial

BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to assess whether a social network intervention was superior to HIV testing and counseling in impacting HIV incidence among PWID. Although this was not a primary study aim, it is associated with reducing drug and sex risk behaviors, which were primary aims. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booth, Robert E., Davis, Jonathan M., Dvoryak, Sergey, Brewster, John T., Lisovska, Oksana, Strathdee, Steffanie A., Latkin, Carl A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30040-6
_version_ 1782466235337801728
author Booth, Robert E.
Davis, Jonathan M.
Dvoryak, Sergey
Brewster, John T.
Lisovska, Oksana
Strathdee, Steffanie A.
Latkin, Carl A.
author_facet Booth, Robert E.
Davis, Jonathan M.
Dvoryak, Sergey
Brewster, John T.
Lisovska, Oksana
Strathdee, Steffanie A.
Latkin, Carl A.
author_sort Booth, Robert E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to assess whether a social network intervention was superior to HIV testing and counseling in impacting HIV incidence among PWID. Although this was not a primary study aim, it is associated with reducing drug and sex risk behaviors, which were primary aims. METHODS: PWID were recruited from street settings in Odessa, Donetsk, and Nikolayev, Ukraine for a clustered randomized clinical trial (RCT). “Index” or peer leaders, along with two of their network members, were randomly assigned to testing and counseling block (N=589) or testing and counseling plus a social network intervention block (N=611). Participants in the network intervention received 5-sessions to train their network members in risk reduction. Those assigned testing and counseling received no further intervention following counseling. Employing an intent to treat analyses, the primary outcome was HIV sero-conversion using Cox regression and incorporating a gamma frailty term to account for clustering. No stratification or minimization was utilized. The trail was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01159704. FINDINGS: Between July 12, 2010 and November 23, 2012, 2,304 PWID were recruited, 1,200 of whom were HIV negative and included in the present study. At baseline, there were no significant differences between groups. Of the 1,200 HIV negative participants, 1,085 (90.4%) were retained at 12 months. Incidence density revealed 18.45 (95% CI 14.87 – 22.03, 102 events in 553.0 py) per 100 person years (py) for those in the intervention group and 31.78 (95% CI 26.83–36.74, 158 events in 497.1 py) per 100 py among control arm participants. This corresponded to a reduced hazard in the intervention group, HR= 0.53 (95% CI 0.38, 0.76, p =0.0003). There were no study-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION: These data provide strong support for integrating peer education into comprehensive HIV prevention programs for PWID and suggest the value in developing and testing peer-led interventions for improving access and adherence to PrEP and ART. FUNDING: This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1 DA026739).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101021
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51010212017-10-01 HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial Booth, Robert E. Davis, Jonathan M. Dvoryak, Sergey Brewster, John T. Lisovska, Oksana Strathdee, Steffanie A. Latkin, Carl A. Lancet HIV Article BACKGROUND: In this study, we sought to assess whether a social network intervention was superior to HIV testing and counseling in impacting HIV incidence among PWID. Although this was not a primary study aim, it is associated with reducing drug and sex risk behaviors, which were primary aims. METHODS: PWID were recruited from street settings in Odessa, Donetsk, and Nikolayev, Ukraine for a clustered randomized clinical trial (RCT). “Index” or peer leaders, along with two of their network members, were randomly assigned to testing and counseling block (N=589) or testing and counseling plus a social network intervention block (N=611). Participants in the network intervention received 5-sessions to train their network members in risk reduction. Those assigned testing and counseling received no further intervention following counseling. Employing an intent to treat analyses, the primary outcome was HIV sero-conversion using Cox regression and incorporating a gamma frailty term to account for clustering. No stratification or minimization was utilized. The trail was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT01159704. FINDINGS: Between July 12, 2010 and November 23, 2012, 2,304 PWID were recruited, 1,200 of whom were HIV negative and included in the present study. At baseline, there were no significant differences between groups. Of the 1,200 HIV negative participants, 1,085 (90.4%) were retained at 12 months. Incidence density revealed 18.45 (95% CI 14.87 – 22.03, 102 events in 553.0 py) per 100 person years (py) for those in the intervention group and 31.78 (95% CI 26.83–36.74, 158 events in 497.1 py) per 100 py among control arm participants. This corresponded to a reduced hazard in the intervention group, HR= 0.53 (95% CI 0.38, 0.76, p =0.0003). There were no study-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION: These data provide strong support for integrating peer education into comprehensive HIV prevention programs for PWID and suggest the value in developing and testing peer-led interventions for improving access and adherence to PrEP and ART. FUNDING: This study was funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (RO1 DA026739). 2016-07-29 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5101021/ /pubmed/27658879 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30040-6 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This manuscript version is made available under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license.
spellingShingle Article
Booth, Robert E.
Davis, Jonathan M.
Dvoryak, Sergey
Brewster, John T.
Lisovska, Oksana
Strathdee, Steffanie A.
Latkin, Carl A.
HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
title HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
title_full HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
title_fullStr HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
title_short HIV incidence among people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
title_sort hiv incidence among people who inject drugs (pwid) in ukraine: results from a clustered randomized trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101021/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27658879
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30040-6
work_keys_str_mv AT boothroberte hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial
AT davisjonathanm hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial
AT dvoryaksergey hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial
AT brewsterjohnt hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial
AT lisovskaoksana hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial
AT strathdeesteffaniea hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial
AT latkincarla hivincidenceamongpeoplewhoinjectdrugspwidinukraineresultsfromaclusteredrandomizedtrial