Cargando…

Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony

Many instances of large-scale coordination occur in real-life social situations without the explicit awareness of the individuals involved. While the majority of research to date has examined dyadic interactions – those between two individuals – during intentional or deliberate coordination, the pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellamil, Melissa, Berson, Josh, Margulies, Daniel S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01744
_version_ 1782466242307686400
author Ellamil, Melissa
Berson, Josh
Margulies, Daniel S.
author_facet Ellamil, Melissa
Berson, Josh
Margulies, Daniel S.
author_sort Ellamil, Melissa
collection PubMed
description Many instances of large-scale coordination occur in real-life social situations without the explicit awareness of the individuals involved. While the majority of research to date has examined dyadic interactions – those between two individuals – during intentional or deliberate coordination, the present review surveys the handful of recent studies investigating behavioral and physiological synchrony across groups of more than two people when coordination was not an explicit goal. Both minimal (e.g., visual information, shared location) and naturalistic (e.g., choir voice section, family relationship) group interactions appear to promote unintentional group synchrony although they have so far only been studied separately. State differences in unintentional group synchrony, or the relative presence of coordination in various conditions, have tended to be assessed differently, such as using correlation-type relationships, compared to its temporal dynamics, or changes over time in the degree of coordination, which appear to be best captured using phase differences. Simultaneously evaluating behavioral, physiological, and social responses as well systematically comparing different synchrony measures could further our understanding of the influences on and measures of group synchrony, allowing us to move away from studying individual persons responding to static laboratory stimuli and toward investigating collective experiences in natural, dynamic social interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51012012016-11-23 Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony Ellamil, Melissa Berson, Josh Margulies, Daniel S. Front Psychol Psychology Many instances of large-scale coordination occur in real-life social situations without the explicit awareness of the individuals involved. While the majority of research to date has examined dyadic interactions – those between two individuals – during intentional or deliberate coordination, the present review surveys the handful of recent studies investigating behavioral and physiological synchrony across groups of more than two people when coordination was not an explicit goal. Both minimal (e.g., visual information, shared location) and naturalistic (e.g., choir voice section, family relationship) group interactions appear to promote unintentional group synchrony although they have so far only been studied separately. State differences in unintentional group synchrony, or the relative presence of coordination in various conditions, have tended to be assessed differently, such as using correlation-type relationships, compared to its temporal dynamics, or changes over time in the degree of coordination, which appear to be best captured using phase differences. Simultaneously evaluating behavioral, physiological, and social responses as well systematically comparing different synchrony measures could further our understanding of the influences on and measures of group synchrony, allowing us to move away from studying individual persons responding to static laboratory stimuli and toward investigating collective experiences in natural, dynamic social interactions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5101201/ /pubmed/27881968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01744 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ellamil, Berson and Margulies. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ellamil, Melissa
Berson, Josh
Margulies, Daniel S.
Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony
title Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony
title_full Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony
title_fullStr Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony
title_full_unstemmed Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony
title_short Influences on and Measures of Unintentional Group Synchrony
title_sort influences on and measures of unintentional group synchrony
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01744
work_keys_str_mv AT ellamilmelissa influencesonandmeasuresofunintentionalgroupsynchrony
AT bersonjosh influencesonandmeasuresofunintentionalgroupsynchrony
AT marguliesdaniels influencesonandmeasuresofunintentionalgroupsynchrony