Cargando…

Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists

OBJECTIVE: To compare the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes and prognosis in gastric cancer patients whose perigastric lymph node retrieval was performed by surgeons and pathologists. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data from 1, 056 patients who under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jiang, Lixin, Yao, Zengwu, Zhang, Yifei, Hu, Jinchen, Zhao, Dawei, Zhai, Huiyuan, Wang, Xixun, Zhang, Zhenbin, Wang, Dong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877010
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.05.06
_version_ 1782466247747698688
author Jiang, Lixin
Yao, Zengwu
Zhang, Yifei
Hu, Jinchen
Zhao, Dawei
Zhai, Huiyuan
Wang, Xixun
Zhang, Zhenbin
Wang, Dong
author_facet Jiang, Lixin
Yao, Zengwu
Zhang, Yifei
Hu, Jinchen
Zhao, Dawei
Zhai, Huiyuan
Wang, Xixun
Zhang, Zhenbin
Wang, Dong
author_sort Jiang, Lixin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes and prognosis in gastric cancer patients whose perigastric lymph node retrieval was performed by surgeons and pathologists. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data from 1, 056 patients who underwent gastric cancer D2 radical lymph node resection between January 2008 and December 2010 in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital. The follow-up ended in December 2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to the specialty of physicians who performed the postoperative perigastric lymph node retrieval: the surgeon group (475 cases) and the pathologist group (581 cases). The numbers of positive and total perigastric lymph nodes and the 3- and 5-year survival were compared between gastric cancer patients in the two groups overall and stratified by TNM stage (the 7th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer). RESULTS: Overall, the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes were significantly higher in the surgeon group than in the pathologist group (6.53±4.07 vs. 4.09±3.70, P=0.021; 29.64±11.50 vs. 20.71±8.56, P<0.001). Further analysis showed that the total number of lymph nodes in stage I patients (19.40±9.62 vs. 15.45±8.59, P=0.011) and the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes in stage II (1.38±1.08 vs. 0.87±1.55, P=0.031; 25.35±10.80 vs. 16.75±8.56, P<0.001) and stage III patients (8.11±6.91 vs. 6.66±5.12, P=0.026; 32.34±12.55 vs. 25.45±8.31, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the surgeon group than in the pathologist group. The survival analysis showed that the 3- and 5-year survival of stage II and III patients was significantly higher in the surgeon group than in the pathologist group (82.0% vs. 73.1%, 69.5% vs. 61.2%, P=0.038; 49.2% vs. 38.9%, 36.3% vs. 28.0%; P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with retrieval performed by pathologists, postoperative perigastric lymph node retrieval performed by surgeons was associated with significant increase in the total lymph node number of stage I patients, the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes of stage II and III patients, and the survival of stage II and stage III gastric cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51012252016-11-22 Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists Jiang, Lixin Yao, Zengwu Zhang, Yifei Hu, Jinchen Zhao, Dawei Zhai, Huiyuan Wang, Xixun Zhang, Zhenbin Wang, Dong Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes and prognosis in gastric cancer patients whose perigastric lymph node retrieval was performed by surgeons and pathologists. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and follow-up data from 1, 056 patients who underwent gastric cancer D2 radical lymph node resection between January 2008 and December 2010 in the Gastrointestinal Surgery Department of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital. The follow-up ended in December 2015. Patients were divided into two groups according to the specialty of physicians who performed the postoperative perigastric lymph node retrieval: the surgeon group (475 cases) and the pathologist group (581 cases). The numbers of positive and total perigastric lymph nodes and the 3- and 5-year survival were compared between gastric cancer patients in the two groups overall and stratified by TNM stage (the 7th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer). RESULTS: Overall, the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes were significantly higher in the surgeon group than in the pathologist group (6.53±4.07 vs. 4.09±3.70, P=0.021; 29.64±11.50 vs. 20.71±8.56, P<0.001). Further analysis showed that the total number of lymph nodes in stage I patients (19.40±9.62 vs. 15.45±8.59, P=0.011) and the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes in stage II (1.38±1.08 vs. 0.87±1.55, P=0.031; 25.35±10.80 vs. 16.75±8.56, P<0.001) and stage III patients (8.11±6.91 vs. 6.66±5.12, P=0.026; 32.34±12.55 vs. 25.45±8.31, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the surgeon group than in the pathologist group. The survival analysis showed that the 3- and 5-year survival of stage II and III patients was significantly higher in the surgeon group than in the pathologist group (82.0% vs. 73.1%, 69.5% vs. 61.2%, P=0.038; 49.2% vs. 38.9%, 36.3% vs. 28.0%; P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with retrieval performed by pathologists, postoperative perigastric lymph node retrieval performed by surgeons was associated with significant increase in the total lymph node number of stage I patients, the numbers of positive and total lymph nodes of stage II and III patients, and the survival of stage II and stage III gastric cancer patients. AME Publishing Company 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5101225/ /pubmed/27877010 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.05.06 Text en Copyright © 2016 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Jiang, Lixin
Yao, Zengwu
Zhang, Yifei
Hu, Jinchen
Zhao, Dawei
Zhai, Huiyuan
Wang, Xixun
Zhang, Zhenbin
Wang, Dong
Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
title Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
title_full Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
title_fullStr Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
title_short Comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
title_sort comparison of lymph node number and prognosis in gastric cancer patients with perigastric lymph nodes retrieved by surgeons and pathologists
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27877010
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.05.06
work_keys_str_mv AT jianglixin comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT yaozengwu comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT zhangyifei comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT hujinchen comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT zhaodawei comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT zhaihuiyuan comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT wangxixun comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT zhangzhenbin comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists
AT wangdong comparisonoflymphnodenumberandprognosisingastriccancerpatientswithperigastriclymphnodesretrievedbysurgeonsandpathologists