Cargando…

Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain. The success of these procedures depends on the accuracy of needle placement, which is influenced by needle size and shape. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to examine and quantif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rand, Ethan, Christolias, George, Visco, Christopher, R. Singh, Jaspal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847693
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.36607
_version_ 1782466278129139712
author Rand, Ethan
Christolias, George
Visco, Christopher
R. Singh, Jaspal
author_facet Rand, Ethan
Christolias, George
Visco, Christopher
R. Singh, Jaspal
author_sort Rand, Ethan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain. The success of these procedures depends on the accuracy of needle placement, which is influenced by needle size and shape. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to examine and quantify the deviation of commonly used spinal needles based on needle tip design and gauge, using a ballistic gel tissue simulant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six needles commonly used in spinal procedures (Quincke, Short Bevel, Chiba, Tuohy, Hustead, Whitacre) were selected for use in this study. Ballistic gel samples were made in molds of two depths, 40mm and 80 mm. Each needle was mounted in a drill press to ensure an accurate needle trajectory. Distance of deflection was recorded for each needle. RESULTS: In comparing the mean deflection of 22 gauge needles of all types at 80 mm of depth, deflection was greatest among beveled needles [Short Bevel (9.96 ± 0.77 mm), Quincke (8.89 ± 0.17 mm), Chiba (7.71 ± 1.16 mm)], moderate among epidural needles [Tuohy (7.64 ± 0.16 mm) and least among the pencil-point needles [Whitacre (0.73 ± 0.34 mm)]. Increased gauge (25 g) led to a significant increase in deflection among beveled needles. The direction of deflection was away from the bevel with Quincke, Chiba and Short Beveled needles and toward the bevel of the Tuohy and Hustead needles. Deflection of the Whitacre pencil-point needle was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: There is clinical utility in knowing the relative deflection of various needle tips. When a procedure requires a needle to be steered around obstacles, or along non-collinear targets, the predictable and large amount of deflection obtained through use of a beveled spinal needle may prove beneficial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51014102016-11-15 Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model Rand, Ethan Christolias, George Visco, Christopher R. Singh, Jaspal Anesth Pain Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are commonly used in the treatment of spinal pain. The success of these procedures depends on the accuracy of needle placement, which is influenced by needle size and shape. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to examine and quantify the deviation of commonly used spinal needles based on needle tip design and gauge, using a ballistic gel tissue simulant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six needles commonly used in spinal procedures (Quincke, Short Bevel, Chiba, Tuohy, Hustead, Whitacre) were selected for use in this study. Ballistic gel samples were made in molds of two depths, 40mm and 80 mm. Each needle was mounted in a drill press to ensure an accurate needle trajectory. Distance of deflection was recorded for each needle. RESULTS: In comparing the mean deflection of 22 gauge needles of all types at 80 mm of depth, deflection was greatest among beveled needles [Short Bevel (9.96 ± 0.77 mm), Quincke (8.89 ± 0.17 mm), Chiba (7.71 ± 1.16 mm)], moderate among epidural needles [Tuohy (7.64 ± 0.16 mm) and least among the pencil-point needles [Whitacre (0.73 ± 0.34 mm)]. Increased gauge (25 g) led to a significant increase in deflection among beveled needles. The direction of deflection was away from the bevel with Quincke, Chiba and Short Beveled needles and toward the bevel of the Tuohy and Hustead needles. Deflection of the Whitacre pencil-point needle was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: There is clinical utility in knowing the relative deflection of various needle tips. When a procedure requires a needle to be steered around obstacles, or along non-collinear targets, the predictable and large amount of deflection obtained through use of a beveled spinal needle may prove beneficial. Kowsar 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5101410/ /pubmed/27847693 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.36607 Text en Copyright © 2016, Iranian Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ISRAPM) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rand, Ethan
Christolias, George
Visco, Christopher
R. Singh, Jaspal
Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model
title Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model
title_full Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model
title_short Comparison of Spinal Needle Deflection in a Ballistic Gel Model
title_sort comparison of spinal needle deflection in a ballistic gel model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27847693
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/aapm.36607
work_keys_str_mv AT randethan comparisonofspinalneedledeflectioninaballisticgelmodel
AT christoliasgeorge comparisonofspinalneedledeflectioninaballisticgelmodel
AT viscochristopher comparisonofspinalneedledeflectioninaballisticgelmodel
AT rsinghjaspal comparisonofspinalneedledeflectioninaballisticgelmodel