Cargando…

Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Although many reports have detailed the advantages and disadvantages between femoral and subclavian arterial cannulations for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the confounding factors caused by disease severity and surgical procedures could not be completely eliminated. We compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hsu, Po-Shun, Tsai, Chien-Sung, Tsai, Yi-Ting, Lin, Chih-Yuan, Lee, Chung-Yi, Ke, Hong-Yan, Lin, Yi-Chang, Tsai, Chien-Suang, Chen, Jia-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Clinics Cardive Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27841900
http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2015-056
_version_ 1782466282192371712
author Hsu, Po-Shun
Tsai, Chien-Sung
Tsai, Yi-Ting
Lin, Chih-Yuan
Lee, Chung-Yi
Ke, Hong-Yan
Lin, Yi-Chang
Tsai, Chien-Suang
Chen, Jia-Lin
author_facet Hsu, Po-Shun
Tsai, Chien-Sung
Tsai, Yi-Ting
Lin, Chih-Yuan
Lee, Chung-Yi
Ke, Hong-Yan
Lin, Yi-Chang
Tsai, Chien-Suang
Chen, Jia-Lin
author_sort Hsu, Po-Shun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although many reports have detailed the advantages and disadvantages between femoral and subclavian arterial cannulations for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the confounding factors caused by disease severity and surgical procedures could not be completely eliminated. We compared femoral and subclavian artery cannulation and report the results for reconstruction of only the ascending aorta. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2010, 51 AADA cases involving reconstruction of only the ascending aorta were retrospectively reviewed and categorised on the basis of femoral (n = 26, 51%) or subclavian (n = 25, 49%) arterycannulation. Bentall’s procedures, arch reconstruction and hybrid operations with stent-grafts were all excluded to avoid confounding factors due to dissection severity. Surgical results, postoperative mortality, and short- and mid-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Subclavian cannulation had a lower incidence of cerebral and myocardial injury and lower hospital mortality than femoral cannulation (8 vs 34%, p = 0.04). Ventilation duration as well as intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were also shorter with subclavian cannulation. Risk factors for hospital mortality included pre-operative respiratory failure (odds ratio: 12.84), peri-operative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time > 200 minutes (odds ratio: 13.49), postoperative acidosis (pH < 7.2, odds ratio: 88.63), and troponin I > 2.0 ng/ml (odds ratio: 20.08). The overall hospital mortality rate was 21%. The 40 survivors were followed up for three years with survival of 75% at one year and 70% at three years. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that subclavian cannulation had a lower incidence of cerebral and myocardial injury as well as better postoperative recovery and lower hospital mortality rates for reconstruction of only the ascending aorta.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Clinics Cardive Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51014312016-11-23 Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan Hsu, Po-Shun Tsai, Chien-Sung Tsai, Yi-Ting Lin, Chih-Yuan Lee, Chung-Yi Ke, Hong-Yan Lin, Yi-Chang Tsai, Chien-Suang Chen, Jia-Lin Cardiovasc J Afr Cardiovascular Topics BACKGROUND: Although many reports have detailed the advantages and disadvantages between femoral and subclavian arterial cannulations for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the confounding factors caused by disease severity and surgical procedures could not be completely eliminated. We compared femoral and subclavian artery cannulation and report the results for reconstruction of only the ascending aorta. METHODS: From January 2003 to December 2010, 51 AADA cases involving reconstruction of only the ascending aorta were retrospectively reviewed and categorised on the basis of femoral (n = 26, 51%) or subclavian (n = 25, 49%) arterycannulation. Bentall’s procedures, arch reconstruction and hybrid operations with stent-grafts were all excluded to avoid confounding factors due to dissection severity. Surgical results, postoperative mortality, and short- and mid-term outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Subclavian cannulation had a lower incidence of cerebral and myocardial injury and lower hospital mortality than femoral cannulation (8 vs 34%, p = 0.04). Ventilation duration as well as intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay were also shorter with subclavian cannulation. Risk factors for hospital mortality included pre-operative respiratory failure (odds ratio: 12.84), peri-operative cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time > 200 minutes (odds ratio: 13.49), postoperative acidosis (pH < 7.2, odds ratio: 88.63), and troponin I > 2.0 ng/ml (odds ratio: 20.08). The overall hospital mortality rate was 21%. The 40 survivors were followed up for three years with survival of 75% at one year and 70% at three years. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that subclavian cannulation had a lower incidence of cerebral and myocardial injury as well as better postoperative recovery and lower hospital mortality rates for reconstruction of only the ascending aorta. Clinics Cardive Publishing 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5101431/ /pubmed/27841900 http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2015-056 Text en Copyright © 2015 Clinics Cardive Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Topics
Hsu, Po-Shun
Tsai, Chien-Sung
Tsai, Yi-Ting
Lin, Chih-Yuan
Lee, Chung-Yi
Ke, Hong-Yan
Lin, Yi-Chang
Tsai, Chien-Suang
Chen, Jia-Lin
Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan
title Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan
title_full Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan
title_fullStr Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan
title_full_unstemmed Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan
title_short Subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type A aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in Taiwan
title_sort subclavian artery cannulation provides better myocardial protection in conventional repair of acute type a aortic dissection: experience from a single medical centre in taiwan
topic Cardiovascular Topics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27841900
http://dx.doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2015-056
work_keys_str_mv AT hsuposhun subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT tsaichiensung subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT tsaiyiting subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT linchihyuan subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT leechungyi subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT kehongyan subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT linyichang subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT tsaichiensuang subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan
AT chenjialin subclavianarterycannulationprovidesbettermyocardialprotectioninconventionalrepairofacutetypeaaorticdissectionexperiencefromasinglemedicalcentreintaiwan