Cargando…

Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic

BACKGROUND: Dispersal events between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic can structure ecological communities and influence the functioning of agrosystems. Here we investigated whether short-distance dispersal events between vineyard and forest patches shape foliar fungal communities. We hypothesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fort, Thomas, Robin, Cécile, Capdevielle, Xavier, Delière, Laurent, Vacher, Corinne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833817
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2656
_version_ 1782466311335444480
author Fort, Thomas
Robin, Cécile
Capdevielle, Xavier
Delière, Laurent
Vacher, Corinne
author_facet Fort, Thomas
Robin, Cécile
Capdevielle, Xavier
Delière, Laurent
Vacher, Corinne
author_sort Fort, Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dispersal events between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic can structure ecological communities and influence the functioning of agrosystems. Here we investigated whether short-distance dispersal events between vineyard and forest patches shape foliar fungal communities. We hypothesized that these communities homogenize between habitats over the course of the growing season, particularly along habitat edges, because of aerial dispersal of spores. METHODS: We monitored the richness and composition of foliar and airborne fungal communities over the season, along transects perpendicular to edges between vineyard and forest patches, using Illumina sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) region. RESULTS: In contrast to our expectation, foliar fungal communities in vineyards and forest patches increasingly differentiate over the growing season, even along habitat edges. Moreover, the richness of foliar fungal communities in grapevine drastically decreased over the growing season, in contrast to that of forest trees. The composition of airborne communities did not differ between habitats. The composition of oak foliar fungal communities change between forest edge and centre. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that dispersal events between habitat patches are not major drivers of foliar fungal communities at the landscape scale. Selective pressures exerted in each habitat by the host plant, the microclimate and the agricultural practices play a greater role, and might account for the differentiation of foliar fugal communities between habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51016092016-11-10 Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic Fort, Thomas Robin, Cécile Capdevielle, Xavier Delière, Laurent Vacher, Corinne PeerJ Agricultural Science BACKGROUND: Dispersal events between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic can structure ecological communities and influence the functioning of agrosystems. Here we investigated whether short-distance dispersal events between vineyard and forest patches shape foliar fungal communities. We hypothesized that these communities homogenize between habitats over the course of the growing season, particularly along habitat edges, because of aerial dispersal of spores. METHODS: We monitored the richness and composition of foliar and airborne fungal communities over the season, along transects perpendicular to edges between vineyard and forest patches, using Illumina sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) region. RESULTS: In contrast to our expectation, foliar fungal communities in vineyards and forest patches increasingly differentiate over the growing season, even along habitat edges. Moreover, the richness of foliar fungal communities in grapevine drastically decreased over the growing season, in contrast to that of forest trees. The composition of airborne communities did not differ between habitats. The composition of oak foliar fungal communities change between forest edge and centre. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that dispersal events between habitat patches are not major drivers of foliar fungal communities at the landscape scale. Selective pressures exerted in each habitat by the host plant, the microclimate and the agricultural practices play a greater role, and might account for the differentiation of foliar fugal communities between habitats. PeerJ Inc. 2016-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5101609/ /pubmed/27833817 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2656 Text en © 2016 Fort et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Agricultural Science
Fort, Thomas
Robin, Cécile
Capdevielle, Xavier
Delière, Laurent
Vacher, Corinne
Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
title Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
title_full Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
title_fullStr Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
title_full_unstemmed Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
title_short Foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
title_sort foliar fungal communities strongly differ between habitat patches in a landscape mosaic
topic Agricultural Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833817
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2656
work_keys_str_mv AT fortthomas foliarfungalcommunitiesstronglydifferbetweenhabitatpatchesinalandscapemosaic
AT robincecile foliarfungalcommunitiesstronglydifferbetweenhabitatpatchesinalandscapemosaic
AT capdeviellexavier foliarfungalcommunitiesstronglydifferbetweenhabitatpatchesinalandscapemosaic
AT delierelaurent foliarfungalcommunitiesstronglydifferbetweenhabitatpatchesinalandscapemosaic
AT vachercorinne foliarfungalcommunitiesstronglydifferbetweenhabitatpatchesinalandscapemosaic