Cargando…
A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
BACKGROUND: Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4 |
_version_ | 1782466323287113728 |
---|---|
author | Schouten, Maartje C. M. van Stel, Henk F. Verheij, Theo J. M. Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S. van de Putte, Elise M. |
author_facet | Schouten, Maartje C. M. van Stel, Henk F. Verheij, Theo J. M. Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S. van de Putte, Elise M. |
author_sort | Schouten, Maartje C. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The reporting code with five steps should ensure consistent action in case of a suspicion. METHODS: All children attending one of the five participating OOH-PC services in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands, in a year time, were included. The checklist is an obligatory field in the electronic patient file and was filled in for all children. In case of a positive checklist, the steps in the reporting code were followed. Additionally, the case was evaluated in a multidisciplinary team to determine the probability of child abuse. RESULTS: The checklist was filled in for 50671 children; 108 (0.2 %) were positive. The multidisciplinary team diagnosed child abuse in 24 (22 %) of the 108 positive checklists, and no child abuse in 36 (33 %). Emotional neglect was the most frequent type of abuse diagnosed. For all abused children, care was implemented according to the protocol. The most frequent care given was a referral to the hospital (N = 7) or contact with child’s own general practitioner (N = 6). CONCLUSION: A checklist followed by a reporting code guarantees consistent actions and care for children with a suspicion of child abuse. The percentage of positive checklists is lower than expected. Validity of the checklist should be assessed in a diagnostic study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5101665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51016652016-11-10 A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study Schouten, Maartje C. M. van Stel, Henk F. Verheij, Theo J. M. Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S. van de Putte, Elise M. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The reporting code with five steps should ensure consistent action in case of a suspicion. METHODS: All children attending one of the five participating OOH-PC services in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands, in a year time, were included. The checklist is an obligatory field in the electronic patient file and was filled in for all children. In case of a positive checklist, the steps in the reporting code were followed. Additionally, the case was evaluated in a multidisciplinary team to determine the probability of child abuse. RESULTS: The checklist was filled in for 50671 children; 108 (0.2 %) were positive. The multidisciplinary team diagnosed child abuse in 24 (22 %) of the 108 positive checklists, and no child abuse in 36 (33 %). Emotional neglect was the most frequent type of abuse diagnosed. For all abused children, care was implemented according to the protocol. The most frequent care given was a referral to the hospital (N = 7) or contact with child’s own general practitioner (N = 6). CONCLUSION: A checklist followed by a reporting code guarantees consistent actions and care for children with a suspicion of child abuse. The percentage of positive checklists is lower than expected. Validity of the checklist should be assessed in a diagnostic study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5101665/ /pubmed/27825297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schouten, Maartje C. M. van Stel, Henk F. Verheij, Theo J. M. Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S. van de Putte, Elise M. A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
title | A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
title_full | A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
title_fullStr | A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
title_short | A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
title_sort | screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schoutenmaartjecm ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT vanstelhenkf ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT verheijtheojm ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT nieuwenhuisedwardes ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT vandeputteelisem ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT schoutenmaartjecm screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT vanstelhenkf screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT verheijtheojm screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT nieuwenhuisedwardes screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy AT vandeputteelisem screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy |