Cargando…

A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schouten, Maartje C. M., van Stel, Henk F., Verheij, Theo J. M., Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S., van de Putte, Elise M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4
_version_ 1782466323287113728
author Schouten, Maartje C. M.
van Stel, Henk F.
Verheij, Theo J. M.
Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S.
van de Putte, Elise M.
author_facet Schouten, Maartje C. M.
van Stel, Henk F.
Verheij, Theo J. M.
Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S.
van de Putte, Elise M.
author_sort Schouten, Maartje C. M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The reporting code with five steps should ensure consistent action in case of a suspicion. METHODS: All children attending one of the five participating OOH-PC services in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands, in a year time, were included. The checklist is an obligatory field in the electronic patient file and was filled in for all children. In case of a positive checklist, the steps in the reporting code were followed. Additionally, the case was evaluated in a multidisciplinary team to determine the probability of child abuse. RESULTS: The checklist was filled in for 50671 children; 108 (0.2 %) were positive. The multidisciplinary team diagnosed child abuse in 24 (22 %) of the 108 positive checklists, and no child abuse in 36 (33 %). Emotional neglect was the most frequent type of abuse diagnosed. For all abused children, care was implemented according to the protocol. The most frequent care given was a referral to the hospital (N = 7) or contact with child’s own general practitioner (N = 6). CONCLUSION: A checklist followed by a reporting code guarantees consistent actions and care for children with a suspicion of child abuse. The percentage of positive checklists is lower than expected. Validity of the checklist should be assessed in a diagnostic study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51016652016-11-10 A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study Schouten, Maartje C. M. van Stel, Henk F. Verheij, Theo J. M. Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S. van de Putte, Elise M. BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Child abuse is often unrecognized at out-of-hours primary care (OOH-PC) services. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the screening instrument SPUTOVAMO-R2 for child abuse (checklist), followed by a structured approach (reporting code), at OOH-PC services. The reporting code with five steps should ensure consistent action in case of a suspicion. METHODS: All children attending one of the five participating OOH-PC services in the region of Utrecht, the Netherlands, in a year time, were included. The checklist is an obligatory field in the electronic patient file and was filled in for all children. In case of a positive checklist, the steps in the reporting code were followed. Additionally, the case was evaluated in a multidisciplinary team to determine the probability of child abuse. RESULTS: The checklist was filled in for 50671 children; 108 (0.2 %) were positive. The multidisciplinary team diagnosed child abuse in 24 (22 %) of the 108 positive checklists, and no child abuse in 36 (33 %). Emotional neglect was the most frequent type of abuse diagnosed. For all abused children, care was implemented according to the protocol. The most frequent care given was a referral to the hospital (N = 7) or contact with child’s own general practitioner (N = 6). CONCLUSION: A checklist followed by a reporting code guarantees consistent actions and care for children with a suspicion of child abuse. The percentage of positive checklists is lower than expected. Validity of the checklist should be assessed in a diagnostic study. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5101665/ /pubmed/27825297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schouten, Maartje C. M.
van Stel, Henk F.
Verheij, Theo J. M.
Nieuwenhuis, Edward E. S.
van de Putte, Elise M.
A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
title A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
title_full A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
title_fullStr A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
title_short A screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
title_sort screening protocol for child abuse at out-of-hours primary care locations: a descriptive study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825297
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0554-4
work_keys_str_mv AT schoutenmaartjecm ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT vanstelhenkf ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT verheijtheojm ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT nieuwenhuisedwardes ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT vandeputteelisem ascreeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT schoutenmaartjecm screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT vanstelhenkf screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT verheijtheojm screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT nieuwenhuisedwardes screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy
AT vandeputteelisem screeningprotocolforchildabuseatoutofhoursprimarycarelocationsadescriptivestudy