Cargando…
Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long term condition that requires early treatment to control symptoms and improve long-term outcomes. Lack of response to RA treatments is not only a waste of healthcare resources, but also causes disability and distress to patients. Identifying biomarkers...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1319-x |
_version_ | 1782466327463591936 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, Kanta Peters, Sarah Barton, Anne |
author_facet | Kumar, Kanta Peters, Sarah Barton, Anne |
author_sort | Kumar, Kanta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long term condition that requires early treatment to control symptoms and improve long-term outcomes. Lack of response to RA treatments is not only a waste of healthcare resources, but also causes disability and distress to patients. Identifying biomarkers predictive of treatment response offers an opportunity to improve clinical decisions about which treatment to recommend in patients and could ultimately lead to better patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore the understanding of and factors affecting Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients’ decisions around predictive treatment testing. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with a purposive sample of 16 patients with RA from three major UK cities. Four focus groups explored patient perceptions of the use of biomarker tests to predict response to treatments. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis by three researchers. RESULTS: Data were organised within three interlinking themes: [1] Perceptions of predictive tests and patient preference of tests; [2] Utility of the test to manage expectations; [3] The influence of the disease duration on take up of predictive testing. During consultations for predictive testing, patients felt they would need, first, careful explanations detailing the consequences of untreated RA and delayed treatment response and, second, support to balance the risks of tests, which might be invasive and/or only moderately accurate, with the potential benefits of better management of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights into predictive testing. Besides supporting clinical decision making, the development of predictive testing in RA is largely supported by patients. Developing strategies which communicate risk information about predictive testing effectively while reducing the psychological burden associated with this information will be essential to maximise uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5101686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51016862016-11-10 Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study Kumar, Kanta Peters, Sarah Barton, Anne BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a long term condition that requires early treatment to control symptoms and improve long-term outcomes. Lack of response to RA treatments is not only a waste of healthcare resources, but also causes disability and distress to patients. Identifying biomarkers predictive of treatment response offers an opportunity to improve clinical decisions about which treatment to recommend in patients and could ultimately lead to better patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore the understanding of and factors affecting Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients’ decisions around predictive treatment testing. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted with a purposive sample of 16 patients with RA from three major UK cities. Four focus groups explored patient perceptions of the use of biomarker tests to predict response to treatments. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis by three researchers. RESULTS: Data were organised within three interlinking themes: [1] Perceptions of predictive tests and patient preference of tests; [2] Utility of the test to manage expectations; [3] The influence of the disease duration on take up of predictive testing. During consultations for predictive testing, patients felt they would need, first, careful explanations detailing the consequences of untreated RA and delayed treatment response and, second, support to balance the risks of tests, which might be invasive and/or only moderately accurate, with the potential benefits of better management of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides important insights into predictive testing. Besides supporting clinical decision making, the development of predictive testing in RA is largely supported by patients. Developing strategies which communicate risk information about predictive testing effectively while reducing the psychological burden associated with this information will be essential to maximise uptake. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5101686/ /pubmed/27825322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1319-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kumar, Kanta Peters, Sarah Barton, Anne Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
title | Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
title_full | Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
title_short | Rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
title_sort | rheumatoid arthritis patient perceptions on the value of predictive testing for treatments: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1319-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarkanta rheumatoidarthritispatientperceptionsonthevalueofpredictivetestingfortreatmentsaqualitativestudy AT peterssarah rheumatoidarthritispatientperceptionsonthevalueofpredictivetestingfortreatmentsaqualitativestudy AT bartonanne rheumatoidarthritispatientperceptionsonthevalueofpredictivetestingfortreatmentsaqualitativestudy AT rheumatoidarthritispatientperceptionsonthevalueofpredictivetestingfortreatmentsaqualitativestudy |