Cargando…

A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures

BACKGROUND: External fixation is commonly used as a means of definitive fixation of pelvic fractures. Pin site infection is common, with some cases of osteomyelitis and inpatient nursing can be challenging. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and complications of an alternative minimally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hoskins, Wayne, Bucknill, Andrew, Wong, James, Britton, Edward, Judson, Rodney, Gumm, Kellie, Santos, Roselyn, Sheehy, Rohan, Griffin, Xavier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0468-9
_version_ 1782466331043430400
author Hoskins, Wayne
Bucknill, Andrew
Wong, James
Britton, Edward
Judson, Rodney
Gumm, Kellie
Santos, Roselyn
Sheehy, Rohan
Griffin, Xavier
author_facet Hoskins, Wayne
Bucknill, Andrew
Wong, James
Britton, Edward
Judson, Rodney
Gumm, Kellie
Santos, Roselyn
Sheehy, Rohan
Griffin, Xavier
author_sort Hoskins, Wayne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: External fixation is commonly used as a means of definitive fixation of pelvic fractures. Pin site infection is common, with some cases of osteomyelitis and inpatient nursing can be challenging. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and complications of an alternative minimally invasive technique, known as INFIX, utilising spinal pedicle screws inserted into the supra-acetabular bone and connected by a subcutaneous rod. METHODS: A single-centre prospective case series was performed. The primary outcome measures were fracture stability and displacement at time of implant removal and intra- and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited, with 85.7 % of fractures being lateral compression type. Mean follow-up was 342 days. Mean application time was 51 min (range 44–65). Nineteen were removed electively, with mean time to removal 109 days. All cases were stable with no displacement. Two cases were removed emergently, one due to wound infection and the other due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropathic pain. Twelve patients sustained a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy, with 20/42 nerves being affected. Improvement in all lateral femoral cutaneous nerve symptoms were reported with removal. Nine patients developed asymptomatic heterotopic ossification, and there were three deep infections and one symptomatic due to the bar. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive internal fixation with the INFIX for anterior pelvic ring fractures is an alternative to anterior external fixation. However, a higher rate of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy is noted, and the implant is not well tolerated by all patients. Further studies are required to define fracture types and patients best suited to the technique and how LFCN complications may be minimised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001421426. Registered 12 October 2016. Retrospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5101701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51017012016-11-10 A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures Hoskins, Wayne Bucknill, Andrew Wong, James Britton, Edward Judson, Rodney Gumm, Kellie Santos, Roselyn Sheehy, Rohan Griffin, Xavier J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: External fixation is commonly used as a means of definitive fixation of pelvic fractures. Pin site infection is common, with some cases of osteomyelitis and inpatient nursing can be challenging. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and complications of an alternative minimally invasive technique, known as INFIX, utilising spinal pedicle screws inserted into the supra-acetabular bone and connected by a subcutaneous rod. METHODS: A single-centre prospective case series was performed. The primary outcome measures were fracture stability and displacement at time of implant removal and intra- and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited, with 85.7 % of fractures being lateral compression type. Mean follow-up was 342 days. Mean application time was 51 min (range 44–65). Nineteen were removed electively, with mean time to removal 109 days. All cases were stable with no displacement. Two cases were removed emergently, one due to wound infection and the other due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropathic pain. Twelve patients sustained a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy, with 20/42 nerves being affected. Improvement in all lateral femoral cutaneous nerve symptoms were reported with removal. Nine patients developed asymptomatic heterotopic ossification, and there were three deep infections and one symptomatic due to the bar. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive internal fixation with the INFIX for anterior pelvic ring fractures is an alternative to anterior external fixation. However, a higher rate of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy is noted, and the implant is not well tolerated by all patients. Further studies are required to define fracture types and patients best suited to the technique and how LFCN complications may be minimised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001421426. Registered 12 October 2016. Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5101701/ /pubmed/27825365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0468-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hoskins, Wayne
Bucknill, Andrew
Wong, James
Britton, Edward
Judson, Rodney
Gumm, Kellie
Santos, Roselyn
Sheehy, Rohan
Griffin, Xavier
A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
title A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
title_full A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
title_fullStr A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
title_full_unstemmed A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
title_short A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
title_sort prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0468-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hoskinswayne aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT bucknillandrew aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT wongjames aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT brittonedward aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT judsonrodney aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT gummkellie aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT santosroselyn aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT sheehyrohan aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT griffinxavier aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT hoskinswayne prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT bucknillandrew prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT wongjames prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT brittonedward prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT judsonrodney prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT gummkellie prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT santosroselyn prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT sheehyrohan prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures
AT griffinxavier prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures