Cargando…
A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures
BACKGROUND: External fixation is commonly used as a means of definitive fixation of pelvic fractures. Pin site infection is common, with some cases of osteomyelitis and inpatient nursing can be challenging. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and complications of an alternative minimally...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0468-9 |
_version_ | 1782466331043430400 |
---|---|
author | Hoskins, Wayne Bucknill, Andrew Wong, James Britton, Edward Judson, Rodney Gumm, Kellie Santos, Roselyn Sheehy, Rohan Griffin, Xavier |
author_facet | Hoskins, Wayne Bucknill, Andrew Wong, James Britton, Edward Judson, Rodney Gumm, Kellie Santos, Roselyn Sheehy, Rohan Griffin, Xavier |
author_sort | Hoskins, Wayne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: External fixation is commonly used as a means of definitive fixation of pelvic fractures. Pin site infection is common, with some cases of osteomyelitis and inpatient nursing can be challenging. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and complications of an alternative minimally invasive technique, known as INFIX, utilising spinal pedicle screws inserted into the supra-acetabular bone and connected by a subcutaneous rod. METHODS: A single-centre prospective case series was performed. The primary outcome measures were fracture stability and displacement at time of implant removal and intra- and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited, with 85.7 % of fractures being lateral compression type. Mean follow-up was 342 days. Mean application time was 51 min (range 44–65). Nineteen were removed electively, with mean time to removal 109 days. All cases were stable with no displacement. Two cases were removed emergently, one due to wound infection and the other due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropathic pain. Twelve patients sustained a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy, with 20/42 nerves being affected. Improvement in all lateral femoral cutaneous nerve symptoms were reported with removal. Nine patients developed asymptomatic heterotopic ossification, and there were three deep infections and one symptomatic due to the bar. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive internal fixation with the INFIX for anterior pelvic ring fractures is an alternative to anterior external fixation. However, a higher rate of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy is noted, and the implant is not well tolerated by all patients. Further studies are required to define fracture types and patients best suited to the technique and how LFCN complications may be minimised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001421426. Registered 12 October 2016. Retrospectively registered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5101701 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51017012016-11-10 A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures Hoskins, Wayne Bucknill, Andrew Wong, James Britton, Edward Judson, Rodney Gumm, Kellie Santos, Roselyn Sheehy, Rohan Griffin, Xavier J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: External fixation is commonly used as a means of definitive fixation of pelvic fractures. Pin site infection is common, with some cases of osteomyelitis and inpatient nursing can be challenging. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes and complications of an alternative minimally invasive technique, known as INFIX, utilising spinal pedicle screws inserted into the supra-acetabular bone and connected by a subcutaneous rod. METHODS: A single-centre prospective case series was performed. The primary outcome measures were fracture stability and displacement at time of implant removal and intra- and post-operative complications. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were recruited, with 85.7 % of fractures being lateral compression type. Mean follow-up was 342 days. Mean application time was 51 min (range 44–65). Nineteen were removed electively, with mean time to removal 109 days. All cases were stable with no displacement. Two cases were removed emergently, one due to wound infection and the other due to lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropathic pain. Twelve patients sustained a lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy, with 20/42 nerves being affected. Improvement in all lateral femoral cutaneous nerve symptoms were reported with removal. Nine patients developed asymptomatic heterotopic ossification, and there were three deep infections and one symptomatic due to the bar. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive internal fixation with the INFIX for anterior pelvic ring fractures is an alternative to anterior external fixation. However, a higher rate of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve palsy is noted, and the implant is not well tolerated by all patients. Further studies are required to define fracture types and patients best suited to the technique and how LFCN complications may be minimised. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12616001421426. Registered 12 October 2016. Retrospectively registered. BioMed Central 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5101701/ /pubmed/27825365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0468-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hoskins, Wayne Bucknill, Andrew Wong, James Britton, Edward Judson, Rodney Gumm, Kellie Santos, Roselyn Sheehy, Rohan Griffin, Xavier A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
title | A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
title_full | A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
title_fullStr | A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
title_short | A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
title_sort | prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5101701/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27825365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0468-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoskinswayne aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT bucknillandrew aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT wongjames aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT brittonedward aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT judsonrodney aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT gummkellie aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT santosroselyn aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT sheehyrohan aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT griffinxavier aprospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT hoskinswayne prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT bucknillandrew prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT wongjames prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT brittonedward prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT judsonrodney prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT gummkellie prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT santosroselyn prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT sheehyrohan prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures AT griffinxavier prospectivecaseseriesforaminimallyinvasiveinternalfixationdeviceforanteriorpelvicringfractures |