Cargando…

Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver computed tomography and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging play an important role in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommend the use of applied imaging studies for HCC diagnosis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Ming-Tsung, Wang, Chih-Chi, Cheng, Yu-Fan, Eng, Hock-Liew, Yen, Yi-Hao, Tsai, Ming-Chao, Tseng, Po-Lin, Chang, Kuo-Chin, Wu, Cheng-Kun, Hu, Tsung-Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166157
_version_ 1782466412402442240
author Lin, Ming-Tsung
Wang, Chih-Chi
Cheng, Yu-Fan
Eng, Hock-Liew
Yen, Yi-Hao
Tsai, Ming-Chao
Tseng, Po-Lin
Chang, Kuo-Chin
Wu, Cheng-Kun
Hu, Tsung-Hui
author_facet Lin, Ming-Tsung
Wang, Chih-Chi
Cheng, Yu-Fan
Eng, Hock-Liew
Yen, Yi-Hao
Tsai, Ming-Chao
Tseng, Po-Lin
Chang, Kuo-Chin
Wu, Cheng-Kun
Hu, Tsung-Hui
author_sort Lin, Ming-Tsung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver computed tomography and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging play an important role in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommend the use of applied imaging studies for HCC diagnosis only in cirrhotic patients. This study aimed to comprehensively compare liver CT and dynamic MRI for HCC diagnosis before surgical resection over years in clinical practice, and also to compare the diagnostic differences between liver CT and dynamic MRI in HCCs with varying degrees of fibrosis. METHODS: 841 patients with liver tumor who had liver CT or dynamic MRI examinations followed by surgical resection were included in the study. We defined typical HCC imaging characteristics as early enhancement in the artery phase and early washout in the venous phase. The tumor size was recorded based on pathological examination after surgery. The pathologic fibrosis score was verified by the METAVIR scoring classification. RESULTS: Among the 841 patients, 756 underwent liver CT and 204 underwent dynamic liver MRI before surgery. The etiologies of chronic liver disease included hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B and C virus, and non-hepatitis B or C virus. The sensitivity and accuracy of liver CT or MRI for HCC diagnosis was approximately 80%~90%. Liver CT had a diagnostic accuracy for HCC similar to that of dynamic MRI, and liver fibrosis stage did not influence their diagnostic efficacies. CONCLUSIONS: The application of 4-phase dynamic CT and MRI exhibit similar diagnostic accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma, in tumors of sizes 1 to 2 cm and >2 cm. Liver fibrosis status did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of liver CT or MRI for HCC. The AASLD and EASL restrictions of dynamic imaging studies for HCC diagnosis to cirrhotic patients alone are unnecessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5102357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51023572016-11-18 Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis Lin, Ming-Tsung Wang, Chih-Chi Cheng, Yu-Fan Eng, Hock-Liew Yen, Yi-Hao Tsai, Ming-Chao Tseng, Po-Lin Chang, Kuo-Chin Wu, Cheng-Kun Hu, Tsung-Hui PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver computed tomography and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging play an important role in the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) recommend the use of applied imaging studies for HCC diagnosis only in cirrhotic patients. This study aimed to comprehensively compare liver CT and dynamic MRI for HCC diagnosis before surgical resection over years in clinical practice, and also to compare the diagnostic differences between liver CT and dynamic MRI in HCCs with varying degrees of fibrosis. METHODS: 841 patients with liver tumor who had liver CT or dynamic MRI examinations followed by surgical resection were included in the study. We defined typical HCC imaging characteristics as early enhancement in the artery phase and early washout in the venous phase. The tumor size was recorded based on pathological examination after surgery. The pathologic fibrosis score was verified by the METAVIR scoring classification. RESULTS: Among the 841 patients, 756 underwent liver CT and 204 underwent dynamic liver MRI before surgery. The etiologies of chronic liver disease included hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B and C virus, and non-hepatitis B or C virus. The sensitivity and accuracy of liver CT or MRI for HCC diagnosis was approximately 80%~90%. Liver CT had a diagnostic accuracy for HCC similar to that of dynamic MRI, and liver fibrosis stage did not influence their diagnostic efficacies. CONCLUSIONS: The application of 4-phase dynamic CT and MRI exhibit similar diagnostic accuracy for hepatocellular carcinoma, in tumors of sizes 1 to 2 cm and >2 cm. Liver fibrosis status did not affect the diagnostic accuracy of liver CT or MRI for HCC. The AASLD and EASL restrictions of dynamic imaging studies for HCC diagnosis to cirrhotic patients alone are unnecessary. Public Library of Science 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5102357/ /pubmed/27829060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166157 Text en © 2016 Lin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lin, Ming-Tsung
Wang, Chih-Chi
Cheng, Yu-Fan
Eng, Hock-Liew
Yen, Yi-Hao
Tsai, Ming-Chao
Tseng, Po-Lin
Chang, Kuo-Chin
Wu, Cheng-Kun
Hu, Tsung-Hui
Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis
title Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis
title_full Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis
title_fullStr Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis
title_short Comprehensive Comparison of Multiple-Detector Computed Tomography and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Varying Degrees of Fibrosis
title_sort comprehensive comparison of multiple-detector computed tomography and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma with varying degrees of fibrosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166157
work_keys_str_mv AT linmingtsung comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT wangchihchi comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT chengyufan comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT enghockliew comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT yenyihao comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT tsaimingchao comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT tsengpolin comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT changkuochin comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT wuchengkun comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis
AT hutsunghui comprehensivecomparisonofmultipledetectorcomputedtomographyanddynamicmagneticresonanceimaginginthediagnosisofhepatocellularcarcinomawithvaryingdegreesoffibrosis