Cargando…

Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)

Delimiting species boundaries among closely related lineages often requires a range of independent data sets and analytical approaches. Similar to other organismal groups, robust species circumscriptions in fungi are increasingly investigated within an empirical framework. Here we attempt to delimit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Xinli, McCune, Bruce, Lumbsch, H. Thorsten, Li, Hui, Leavitt, Steven, Yamamoto, Yoshikazu, Tchabanenko, Svetlana, Wei, Jiangchun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27828951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163664
_version_ 1782466434824142848
author Wei, Xinli
McCune, Bruce
Lumbsch, H. Thorsten
Li, Hui
Leavitt, Steven
Yamamoto, Yoshikazu
Tchabanenko, Svetlana
Wei, Jiangchun
author_facet Wei, Xinli
McCune, Bruce
Lumbsch, H. Thorsten
Li, Hui
Leavitt, Steven
Yamamoto, Yoshikazu
Tchabanenko, Svetlana
Wei, Jiangchun
author_sort Wei, Xinli
collection PubMed
description Delimiting species boundaries among closely related lineages often requires a range of independent data sets and analytical approaches. Similar to other organismal groups, robust species circumscriptions in fungi are increasingly investigated within an empirical framework. Here we attempt to delimit species boundaries in a closely related clade of lichen-forming fungi endemic to Asia, the Hypogymnia hypotrypa group (Parmeliaceae). In the current classification, the Hypogymnia hypotrypa group includes two species: H. hypotrypa and H. flavida, which are separated based on distinctive reproductive modes, the former producing soredia but absent in the latter. We reexamined the relationship between these two species using phenotypic characters and molecular sequence data (ITS, GPD, and MCM7 sequences) to address species boundaries in this group. In addition to morphological investigations, we used Bayesian clustering to identify potential genetic groups in the H. hypotrypa/H. flavida clade. We also used a variety of empirical, sequence-based species delimitation approaches, including: the “Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery” (ABGD), the Poisson tree process model (PTP), the General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC), and the multispecies coalescent approach BPP. Different species delimitation scenarios were compared using Bayes factors delimitation analysis, in addition to comparisons of pairwise genetic distances, pairwise fixation indices (F(ST)). The majority of the species delimitation analyses implemented in this study failed to support H. hypotrypa and H. flavida as distinct lineages, as did the Bayesian clustering analysis. However, strong support for the evolutionary independence of H. hypotrypa and H. flavida was inferred using BPP and further supported by Bayes factor delimitation. In spite of rigorous morphological comparisons and a wide range of sequence-based approaches to delimit species, species boundaries in the H. hypotrypa group remain uncertain. This study reveals the potential limitations of relying on distinct reproductive strategies as diagnostic taxonomic characters for Hypogymnia and also the challenges of using popular sequence-based species delimitation methods in groups with recent diversification histories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5102465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51024652016-11-18 Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) Wei, Xinli McCune, Bruce Lumbsch, H. Thorsten Li, Hui Leavitt, Steven Yamamoto, Yoshikazu Tchabanenko, Svetlana Wei, Jiangchun PLoS One Research Article Delimiting species boundaries among closely related lineages often requires a range of independent data sets and analytical approaches. Similar to other organismal groups, robust species circumscriptions in fungi are increasingly investigated within an empirical framework. Here we attempt to delimit species boundaries in a closely related clade of lichen-forming fungi endemic to Asia, the Hypogymnia hypotrypa group (Parmeliaceae). In the current classification, the Hypogymnia hypotrypa group includes two species: H. hypotrypa and H. flavida, which are separated based on distinctive reproductive modes, the former producing soredia but absent in the latter. We reexamined the relationship between these two species using phenotypic characters and molecular sequence data (ITS, GPD, and MCM7 sequences) to address species boundaries in this group. In addition to morphological investigations, we used Bayesian clustering to identify potential genetic groups in the H. hypotrypa/H. flavida clade. We also used a variety of empirical, sequence-based species delimitation approaches, including: the “Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery” (ABGD), the Poisson tree process model (PTP), the General Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC), and the multispecies coalescent approach BPP. Different species delimitation scenarios were compared using Bayes factors delimitation analysis, in addition to comparisons of pairwise genetic distances, pairwise fixation indices (F(ST)). The majority of the species delimitation analyses implemented in this study failed to support H. hypotrypa and H. flavida as distinct lineages, as did the Bayesian clustering analysis. However, strong support for the evolutionary independence of H. hypotrypa and H. flavida was inferred using BPP and further supported by Bayes factor delimitation. In spite of rigorous morphological comparisons and a wide range of sequence-based approaches to delimit species, species boundaries in the H. hypotrypa group remain uncertain. This study reveals the potential limitations of relying on distinct reproductive strategies as diagnostic taxonomic characters for Hypogymnia and also the challenges of using popular sequence-based species delimitation methods in groups with recent diversification histories. Public Library of Science 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5102465/ /pubmed/27828951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163664 Text en © 2016 Wei et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wei, Xinli
McCune, Bruce
Lumbsch, H. Thorsten
Li, Hui
Leavitt, Steven
Yamamoto, Yoshikazu
Tchabanenko, Svetlana
Wei, Jiangchun
Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
title Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
title_full Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
title_fullStr Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
title_full_unstemmed Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
title_short Limitations of Species Delimitation Based on Phylogenetic Analyses: A Case Study in the Hypogymnia hypotrypa Group (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota)
title_sort limitations of species delimitation based on phylogenetic analyses: a case study in the hypogymnia hypotrypa group (parmeliaceae, ascomycota)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27828951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163664
work_keys_str_mv AT weixinli limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT mccunebruce limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT lumbschhthorsten limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT lihui limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT leavittsteven limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT yamamotoyoshikazu limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT tchabanenkosvetlana limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota
AT weijiangchun limitationsofspeciesdelimitationbasedonphylogeneticanalysesacasestudyinthehypogymniahypotrypagroupparmeliaceaeascomycota