Cargando…

Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport

INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal intubation is a common intervention in critical care patients undergoing helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) transportation. Measurement of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressures is not common practice in patients referred to our service. Animal studies have demon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tennyson, Joseph, Ford-Webb, Tucker, Weisberg, Stacy, LeBlanc, Donald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833679
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30639
_version_ 1782466451618136064
author Tennyson, Joseph
Ford-Webb, Tucker
Weisberg, Stacy
LeBlanc, Donald
author_facet Tennyson, Joseph
Ford-Webb, Tucker
Weisberg, Stacy
LeBlanc, Donald
author_sort Tennyson, Joseph
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal intubation is a common intervention in critical care patients undergoing helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) transportation. Measurement of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressures is not common practice in patients referred to our service. Animal studies have demonstrated an association between the pressure of the ETT cuff on the tracheal mucosa and decreased blood flow leading to mucosal ischemia and scarring. Cuff pressures greater than 30 cmH(2)O impede mucosal capillary blood flow. Multiple prior studies have recommended 30 cmH(2)O as the maximum safe cuff inflation pressure. This study sought to evaluate the inflation pressures in ETT cuffs of patients presenting to HEMS. METHODS: We enrolled a convenience sample of patients presenting to UMass Memorial LifeFlight who were intubated by the sending facility or emergency medical services (EMS) agency. Flight crews measured the ETT cuff pressures using a commercially available device. Those patients intubated by the flight crew were excluded from this analysis as the cuff was inflated with the manometer to a standardized pressure. Crews logged the results on a research form, and we analyzed the data using Microsoft Excel and an online statistical analysis tool. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 55 patients. There was a mean age of 57 years (range 18–90). The mean ETT cuff pressure was 70 (95% CI= [61–80]) cmH(2)O. The mean lies 40 cmH(2)O above the maximum accepted value of 30 cmH(2)O (p<0.0001). Eighty-four percent (84%) of patients encountered had pressures above the recommended maximum. The most frequently recorded pressure was >120 cmH(2)O, the maximum pressure on the analog gauge. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting to HEMS after intubation by the referral agency (EMS or hospital) have ETT cuffs inflated to pressures that are, on average, more than double the recommended maximum. These patients are at risk for tracheal mucosal injury and scarring from decreased mucosal capillary blood flow. Hospital and EMS providers should use ETT cuff manometry to ensure that they inflate ETT cuffs to safe pressures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5102598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51025982016-11-10 Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport Tennyson, Joseph Ford-Webb, Tucker Weisberg, Stacy LeBlanc, Donald West J Emerg Med Prehospital Care INTRODUCTION: Endotracheal intubation is a common intervention in critical care patients undergoing helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) transportation. Measurement of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressures is not common practice in patients referred to our service. Animal studies have demonstrated an association between the pressure of the ETT cuff on the tracheal mucosa and decreased blood flow leading to mucosal ischemia and scarring. Cuff pressures greater than 30 cmH(2)O impede mucosal capillary blood flow. Multiple prior studies have recommended 30 cmH(2)O as the maximum safe cuff inflation pressure. This study sought to evaluate the inflation pressures in ETT cuffs of patients presenting to HEMS. METHODS: We enrolled a convenience sample of patients presenting to UMass Memorial LifeFlight who were intubated by the sending facility or emergency medical services (EMS) agency. Flight crews measured the ETT cuff pressures using a commercially available device. Those patients intubated by the flight crew were excluded from this analysis as the cuff was inflated with the manometer to a standardized pressure. Crews logged the results on a research form, and we analyzed the data using Microsoft Excel and an online statistical analysis tool. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 55 patients. There was a mean age of 57 years (range 18–90). The mean ETT cuff pressure was 70 (95% CI= [61–80]) cmH(2)O. The mean lies 40 cmH(2)O above the maximum accepted value of 30 cmH(2)O (p<0.0001). Eighty-four percent (84%) of patients encountered had pressures above the recommended maximum. The most frequently recorded pressure was >120 cmH(2)O, the maximum pressure on the analog gauge. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting to HEMS after intubation by the referral agency (EMS or hospital) have ETT cuffs inflated to pressures that are, on average, more than double the recommended maximum. These patients are at risk for tracheal mucosal injury and scarring from decreased mucosal capillary blood flow. Hospital and EMS providers should use ETT cuff manometry to ensure that they inflate ETT cuffs to safe pressures. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2016-11 2016-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5102598/ /pubmed/27833679 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30639 Text en © 2016 Tennyson et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Prehospital Care
Tennyson, Joseph
Ford-Webb, Tucker
Weisberg, Stacy
LeBlanc, Donald
Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
title Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
title_full Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
title_fullStr Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
title_full_unstemmed Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
title_short Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressures in Patients Intubated Prior to Helicopter EMS Transport
title_sort endotracheal tube cuff pressures in patients intubated prior to helicopter ems transport
topic Prehospital Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833679
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30639
work_keys_str_mv AT tennysonjoseph endotrachealtubecuffpressuresinpatientsintubatedpriortohelicopteremstransport
AT fordwebbtucker endotrachealtubecuffpressuresinpatientsintubatedpriortohelicopteremstransport
AT weisbergstacy endotrachealtubecuffpressuresinpatientsintubatedpriortohelicopteremstransport
AT leblancdonald endotrachealtubecuffpressuresinpatientsintubatedpriortohelicopteremstransport