Cargando…
Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry
OBJECTIVE: This study provides evaluation results of an online study group (OSG) for geriatric psychiatry continuing professional development. METHODS: The OSG is an interactive, expert-facilitated, asynchronous educational experience for psychiatrists and residents in Canada. A retrospective web su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0377-y |
_version_ | 1782466510887845888 |
---|---|
author | Law, Marcus Rapoport, Mark J. Seitz, Dallas Davidson, Marla Madan, Robert Wiens, Andrew |
author_facet | Law, Marcus Rapoport, Mark J. Seitz, Dallas Davidson, Marla Madan, Robert Wiens, Andrew |
author_sort | Law, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study provides evaluation results of an online study group (OSG) for geriatric psychiatry continuing professional development. METHODS: The OSG is an interactive, expert-facilitated, asynchronous educational experience for psychiatrists and residents in Canada. A retrospective web survey assessed self-efficacy, knowledge in geriatric psychiatry, comfort with online learning, and perceived effectiveness of the instructional methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (of 50) participants (58 %) completed the questionnaire. Although only 48 % of respondents reported improved perceived knowledge, 79 % reported improved efficacy beliefs, and 76 % reported improved comfort with online learning. Most (79 %) would consider taking OSG again, and 93 % would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: The OSG was well-received, with greater benefits for self-efficacy with the material and comfort with online learning than for perceived knowledge itself. Further research is needed to ascertain actual knowledge change in the context of online learning in medical education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5102959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51029592016-11-21 Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry Law, Marcus Rapoport, Mark J. Seitz, Dallas Davidson, Marla Madan, Robert Wiens, Andrew Acad Psychiatry In Brief Report OBJECTIVE: This study provides evaluation results of an online study group (OSG) for geriatric psychiatry continuing professional development. METHODS: The OSG is an interactive, expert-facilitated, asynchronous educational experience for psychiatrists and residents in Canada. A retrospective web survey assessed self-efficacy, knowledge in geriatric psychiatry, comfort with online learning, and perceived effectiveness of the instructional methods. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (of 50) participants (58 %) completed the questionnaire. Although only 48 % of respondents reported improved perceived knowledge, 79 % reported improved efficacy beliefs, and 76 % reported improved comfort with online learning. Most (79 %) would consider taking OSG again, and 93 % would recommend it to others. CONCLUSIONS: The OSG was well-received, with greater benefits for self-efficacy with the material and comfort with online learning than for perceived knowledge itself. Further research is needed to ascertain actual knowledge change in the context of online learning in medical education. Springer International Publishing 2015-06-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5102959/ /pubmed/26108395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0377-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | In Brief Report Law, Marcus Rapoport, Mark J. Seitz, Dallas Davidson, Marla Madan, Robert Wiens, Andrew Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry |
title | Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry |
title_full | Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry |
title_short | Evaluation of a National Online Educational Program in Geriatric Psychiatry |
title_sort | evaluation of a national online educational program in geriatric psychiatry |
topic | In Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5102959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26108395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0377-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lawmarcus evaluationofanationalonlineeducationalprogramingeriatricpsychiatry AT rapoportmarkj evaluationofanationalonlineeducationalprogramingeriatricpsychiatry AT seitzdallas evaluationofanationalonlineeducationalprogramingeriatricpsychiatry AT davidsonmarla evaluationofanationalonlineeducationalprogramingeriatricpsychiatry AT madanrobert evaluationofanationalonlineeducationalprogramingeriatricpsychiatry AT wiensandrew evaluationofanationalonlineeducationalprogramingeriatricpsychiatry |