Cargando…

Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture

OBJECTIVES: Several studies focusing diagnosis of forearm fracture using Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography (POCUS) had been carried out in children. There is a lack of evidence for the utility of sonographic (US) examination for detecting of distal forearm fracture in adults. We aim to determine the dia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sivrikaya, Semra, Aksay, Ersin, Bayram, Basak, Oray, Nese Colak, Karakasli, Ahmet, Altintas, Emel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.04.002
_version_ 1782466520439324672
author Sivrikaya, Semra
Aksay, Ersin
Bayram, Basak
Oray, Nese Colak
Karakasli, Ahmet
Altintas, Emel
author_facet Sivrikaya, Semra
Aksay, Ersin
Bayram, Basak
Oray, Nese Colak
Karakasli, Ahmet
Altintas, Emel
author_sort Sivrikaya, Semra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Several studies focusing diagnosis of forearm fracture using Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography (POCUS) had been carried out in children. There is a lack of evidence for the utility of sonographic (US) examination for detecting of distal forearm fracture in adults. We aim to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of POCUS examination for the fracture of the distal radius and ulna in adult patients presenting with blunt forearm trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients presenting with acute distal forearm trauma and suspicion of fracture were enrolled into study. POCUS had been performed by blinded emergency physicians, than anteroposterior and lateral x-rays was obtained. If inconsistency between x-rays and POCUS has been occurred, computed tomography were ordered. Assessment of orthopedic surgeon was accepted as a gold standard diagnosis. RESULTS: Ninety three POCUS were performed in 90 patients. Fifty nine radius and 19 ulna fracture had been diagnosed. POCUS detected all radius fracture, but missed 2 ulna fracture. There were 4 false positive results for both radius and ulna with POCUS. X-ray missed 4 radius, and 1 ulna fractures. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for fracture of ulna were 89.5% (CI%95, 65.5–98.1) and 94.6 (CI%95, 86–98.2), for fracture of radius were 100% (CI%95, 92.4–100), and 88.2%. (CI%95, 71.6–96.1). CONCLUSION: Emergency physician performed POCUS examination is very sensitive and specific the diagnosis of distal forearm fracture. Diagnostic sensitivity of POCUS for radius fracture is higher than x-ray.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51030502016-11-17 Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture Sivrikaya, Semra Aksay, Ersin Bayram, Basak Oray, Nese Colak Karakasli, Ahmet Altintas, Emel Turk J Emerg Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: Several studies focusing diagnosis of forearm fracture using Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography (POCUS) had been carried out in children. There is a lack of evidence for the utility of sonographic (US) examination for detecting of distal forearm fracture in adults. We aim to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of POCUS examination for the fracture of the distal radius and ulna in adult patients presenting with blunt forearm trauma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients presenting with acute distal forearm trauma and suspicion of fracture were enrolled into study. POCUS had been performed by blinded emergency physicians, than anteroposterior and lateral x-rays was obtained. If inconsistency between x-rays and POCUS has been occurred, computed tomography were ordered. Assessment of orthopedic surgeon was accepted as a gold standard diagnosis. RESULTS: Ninety three POCUS were performed in 90 patients. Fifty nine radius and 19 ulna fracture had been diagnosed. POCUS detected all radius fracture, but missed 2 ulna fracture. There were 4 false positive results for both radius and ulna with POCUS. X-ray missed 4 radius, and 1 ulna fractures. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of POCUS for fracture of ulna were 89.5% (CI%95, 65.5–98.1) and 94.6 (CI%95, 86–98.2), for fracture of radius were 100% (CI%95, 92.4–100), and 88.2%. (CI%95, 71.6–96.1). CONCLUSION: Emergency physician performed POCUS examination is very sensitive and specific the diagnosis of distal forearm fracture. Diagnostic sensitivity of POCUS for radius fracture is higher than x-ray. Elsevier 2016-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5103050/ /pubmed/27857985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.04.002 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Emergency Medicine Association of Turkey. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the Owner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sivrikaya, Semra
Aksay, Ersin
Bayram, Basak
Oray, Nese Colak
Karakasli, Ahmet
Altintas, Emel
Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
title Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
title_full Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
title_fullStr Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
title_full_unstemmed Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
title_short Emergency physicians performed Point-of-Care-Ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
title_sort emergency physicians performed point-of-care-ultrasonography for detecting distal forearm fracture
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27857985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2016.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sivrikayasemra emergencyphysiciansperformedpointofcareultrasonographyfordetectingdistalforearmfracture
AT aksayersin emergencyphysiciansperformedpointofcareultrasonographyfordetectingdistalforearmfracture
AT bayrambasak emergencyphysiciansperformedpointofcareultrasonographyfordetectingdistalforearmfracture
AT oraynesecolak emergencyphysiciansperformedpointofcareultrasonographyfordetectingdistalforearmfracture
AT karakasliahmet emergencyphysiciansperformedpointofcareultrasonographyfordetectingdistalforearmfracture
AT altintasemel emergencyphysiciansperformedpointofcareultrasonographyfordetectingdistalforearmfracture