Cargando…

Underwater noise levels in UK waters

Underwater noise from human activities appears to be rising, with ramifications for acoustically sensitive marine organisms and the functioning of marine ecosystems. Policymakers are beginning to address the risk of ecological impact, but are constrained by a lack of data on current and historic noi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merchant, Nathan D., Brookes, Kate L., Faulkner, Rebecca C., Bicknell, Anthony W. J., Godley, Brendan J., Witt, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36942
_version_ 1782466563755999232
author Merchant, Nathan D.
Brookes, Kate L.
Faulkner, Rebecca C.
Bicknell, Anthony W. J.
Godley, Brendan J.
Witt, Matthew J.
author_facet Merchant, Nathan D.
Brookes, Kate L.
Faulkner, Rebecca C.
Bicknell, Anthony W. J.
Godley, Brendan J.
Witt, Matthew J.
author_sort Merchant, Nathan D.
collection PubMed
description Underwater noise from human activities appears to be rising, with ramifications for acoustically sensitive marine organisms and the functioning of marine ecosystems. Policymakers are beginning to address the risk of ecological impact, but are constrained by a lack of data on current and historic noise levels. Here, we present the first nationally coordinated effort to quantify underwater noise levels, in support of UK policy objectives under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Field measurements were made during 2013–2014 at twelve sites around the UK. Median noise levels ranged from 81.5–95.5 dB re 1 μPa for one-third octave bands from 63–500 Hz. Noise exposure varied considerably, with little anthropogenic influence at the Celtic Sea site, to several North Sea sites with persistent vessel noise. Comparison of acoustic metrics found that the RMS level (conventionally used to represent the mean) was highly skewed by outliers, exceeding the 97(th) percentile at some frequencies. We conclude that environmental indicators of anthropogenic noise should instead use percentiles, to ensure statistical robustness. Power analysis indicated that at least three decades of continuous monitoring would be required to detect trends of similar magnitude to historic rises in noise levels observed in the Northeast Pacific.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103265
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51032652016-11-17 Underwater noise levels in UK waters Merchant, Nathan D. Brookes, Kate L. Faulkner, Rebecca C. Bicknell, Anthony W. J. Godley, Brendan J. Witt, Matthew J. Sci Rep Article Underwater noise from human activities appears to be rising, with ramifications for acoustically sensitive marine organisms and the functioning of marine ecosystems. Policymakers are beginning to address the risk of ecological impact, but are constrained by a lack of data on current and historic noise levels. Here, we present the first nationally coordinated effort to quantify underwater noise levels, in support of UK policy objectives under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Field measurements were made during 2013–2014 at twelve sites around the UK. Median noise levels ranged from 81.5–95.5 dB re 1 μPa for one-third octave bands from 63–500 Hz. Noise exposure varied considerably, with little anthropogenic influence at the Celtic Sea site, to several North Sea sites with persistent vessel noise. Comparison of acoustic metrics found that the RMS level (conventionally used to represent the mean) was highly skewed by outliers, exceeding the 97(th) percentile at some frequencies. We conclude that environmental indicators of anthropogenic noise should instead use percentiles, to ensure statistical robustness. Power analysis indicated that at least three decades of continuous monitoring would be required to detect trends of similar magnitude to historic rises in noise levels observed in the Northeast Pacific. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5103265/ /pubmed/27830837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36942 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Merchant, Nathan D.
Brookes, Kate L.
Faulkner, Rebecca C.
Bicknell, Anthony W. J.
Godley, Brendan J.
Witt, Matthew J.
Underwater noise levels in UK waters
title Underwater noise levels in UK waters
title_full Underwater noise levels in UK waters
title_fullStr Underwater noise levels in UK waters
title_full_unstemmed Underwater noise levels in UK waters
title_short Underwater noise levels in UK waters
title_sort underwater noise levels in uk waters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103265/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27830837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep36942
work_keys_str_mv AT merchantnathand underwaternoiselevelsinukwaters
AT brookeskatel underwaternoiselevelsinukwaters
AT faulknerrebeccac underwaternoiselevelsinukwaters
AT bicknellanthonywj underwaternoiselevelsinukwaters
AT godleybrendanj underwaternoiselevelsinukwaters
AT wittmatthewj underwaternoiselevelsinukwaters