Cargando…

A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota influences metabolic, nutritional, and immunologic processes and has been associated with a broad range of adverse health outcomes including asthma, obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Early life exposures may alter the course of gut microbial colonization leading to d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simioni, Julia, Hutton, Eileen K., Gunn, Elizabeth, Holloway, Alison C., Stearns, Jennifer C., McDonald, Helen, Mousseau, Andrea, Schertzer, Jonathan D., Ratcliffe, Elyanne M., Thabane, Lehana, Surette, Michael G., Morrison, Katherine M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0724-5
_version_ 1782466581344813056
author Simioni, Julia
Hutton, Eileen K.
Gunn, Elizabeth
Holloway, Alison C.
Stearns, Jennifer C.
McDonald, Helen
Mousseau, Andrea
Schertzer, Jonathan D.
Ratcliffe, Elyanne M.
Thabane, Lehana
Surette, Michael G.
Morrison, Katherine M.
author_facet Simioni, Julia
Hutton, Eileen K.
Gunn, Elizabeth
Holloway, Alison C.
Stearns, Jennifer C.
McDonald, Helen
Mousseau, Andrea
Schertzer, Jonathan D.
Ratcliffe, Elyanne M.
Thabane, Lehana
Surette, Michael G.
Morrison, Katherine M.
author_sort Simioni, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota influences metabolic, nutritional, and immunologic processes and has been associated with a broad range of adverse health outcomes including asthma, obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Early life exposures may alter the course of gut microbial colonization leading to differences in metabolic and immune regulation throughout life. Although approximately 50 % of low-risk full-term infants born in Canada are exposed to intrapartum antibiotics, little is known about the influence of this common prophylactic treatment on the developing neonatal intestinal microbiota. The purpose of this study is to describe the intestinal microbiome over the first 3 years of life among healthy, breastfed infants born to women with low-risk pregnancies at full term gestation and to determine if at 1 year of age, the intestinal microbiome of infants exposed to intrapartum antibiotics differs in type and quantity from the infants that are not exposed. METHODS: A prospectively followed cohort of 240 mother-infant pairs will be formed by enrolling eligible pregnant women from midwifery practices in the City of Hamilton and surrounding area in Ontario, Canada. Participants will be followed until the age of 3 years. Women are eligible to participate in the study if they are considered to be low-risk, planning a vaginal birth and able to communicate in English. Women are excluded if they have a multiple pregnancy or a preterm birth. Study questionnaires are completed, anthropometric measures are taken and biological samples are acquired including eight infant stool samples between 3 days and 3 years of age. DISCUSSION: Our experience to date indicates that midwifery practices and clients are keen to participate in this research. The midwifery client population is likely to have high rates of breastfeeding and low rates of intervention, allowing us to examine the comparative development of the microbiome in a relatively healthy and homogenous population. Results from this study will make an important contribution to the growing understanding of the patterns of intestinal microbiome colonization in the early years of life and may have implications for best practices to support the establishment of the microbiome at birth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0724-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51033942016-11-10 A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol Simioni, Julia Hutton, Eileen K. Gunn, Elizabeth Holloway, Alison C. Stearns, Jennifer C. McDonald, Helen Mousseau, Andrea Schertzer, Jonathan D. Ratcliffe, Elyanne M. Thabane, Lehana Surette, Michael G. Morrison, Katherine M. BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota influences metabolic, nutritional, and immunologic processes and has been associated with a broad range of adverse health outcomes including asthma, obesity and Type 2 diabetes. Early life exposures may alter the course of gut microbial colonization leading to differences in metabolic and immune regulation throughout life. Although approximately 50 % of low-risk full-term infants born in Canada are exposed to intrapartum antibiotics, little is known about the influence of this common prophylactic treatment on the developing neonatal intestinal microbiota. The purpose of this study is to describe the intestinal microbiome over the first 3 years of life among healthy, breastfed infants born to women with low-risk pregnancies at full term gestation and to determine if at 1 year of age, the intestinal microbiome of infants exposed to intrapartum antibiotics differs in type and quantity from the infants that are not exposed. METHODS: A prospectively followed cohort of 240 mother-infant pairs will be formed by enrolling eligible pregnant women from midwifery practices in the City of Hamilton and surrounding area in Ontario, Canada. Participants will be followed until the age of 3 years. Women are eligible to participate in the study if they are considered to be low-risk, planning a vaginal birth and able to communicate in English. Women are excluded if they have a multiple pregnancy or a preterm birth. Study questionnaires are completed, anthropometric measures are taken and biological samples are acquired including eight infant stool samples between 3 days and 3 years of age. DISCUSSION: Our experience to date indicates that midwifery practices and clients are keen to participate in this research. The midwifery client population is likely to have high rates of breastfeeding and low rates of intervention, allowing us to examine the comparative development of the microbiome in a relatively healthy and homogenous population. Results from this study will make an important contribution to the growing understanding of the patterns of intestinal microbiome colonization in the early years of life and may have implications for best practices to support the establishment of the microbiome at birth. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-016-0724-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5103394/ /pubmed/27832763 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0724-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Simioni, Julia
Hutton, Eileen K.
Gunn, Elizabeth
Holloway, Alison C.
Stearns, Jennifer C.
McDonald, Helen
Mousseau, Andrea
Schertzer, Jonathan D.
Ratcliffe, Elyanne M.
Thabane, Lehana
Surette, Michael G.
Morrison, Katherine M.
A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol
title A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol
title_full A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol
title_fullStr A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol
title_short A comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: The Baby & Microbiota of the Intestine cohort study protocol
title_sort comparison of intestinal microbiota in a population of low-risk infants exposed and not exposed to intrapartum antibiotics: the baby & microbiota of the intestine cohort study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0724-5
work_keys_str_mv AT simionijulia acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT huttoneileenk acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT gunnelizabeth acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT hollowayalisonc acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT stearnsjenniferc acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT mcdonaldhelen acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT mousseauandrea acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT schertzerjonathand acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT ratcliffeelyannem acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT thabanelehana acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT surettemichaelg acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT morrisonkatherinem acomparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT simionijulia comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT huttoneileenk comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT gunnelizabeth comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT hollowayalisonc comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT stearnsjenniferc comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT mcdonaldhelen comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT mousseauandrea comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT schertzerjonathand comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT ratcliffeelyannem comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT thabanelehana comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT surettemichaelg comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol
AT morrisonkatherinem comparisonofintestinalmicrobiotainapopulationoflowriskinfantsexposedandnotexposedtointrapartumantibioticsthebabymicrobiotaoftheintestinecohortstudyprotocol