Cargando…
In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
BACKGROUND: Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is an alternative pharmacodynamic parameter that has been used to measure antimicrobial activity and represents the propensities of antimicrobial agents to select resistant mutants. The concentration range between minimum inhibitory concentration (MI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0796-3 |
_version_ | 1782466602851106816 |
---|---|
author | Li, Yafei Zhang, Yanan Ding, Huanzhong Mei, Xian Liu, Wei Zeng, Jiaxiong Zeng, Zhenling |
author_facet | Li, Yafei Zhang, Yanan Ding, Huanzhong Mei, Xian Liu, Wei Zeng, Jiaxiong Zeng, Zhenling |
author_sort | Li, Yafei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is an alternative pharmacodynamic parameter that has been used to measure antimicrobial activity and represents the propensities of antimicrobial agents to select resistant mutants. The concentration range between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC is defined as mutant selection window (MSW). The MPC and MSW parameters represent the ability of antimicrobial agents to inhibit the bacterial mutants selected. This study was conducted to determine the MIC and MPC values of four antimicrobials including ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin against 105 Riemerella anatipestifer isolates. RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) values of clinical isolates tested in our study for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin were 0.063/0.5、0.031/0.5、1/4、1/4 μg/mL, respectively; MPC(50)/ MPC(90) values were 4/64、8/64、4/32、16/256 μg/mL, respectively. These results provided information on the use of these compounds in treating the R. anatipestifer infection; however, additional studies are needed to demonstrate their therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSION: Based on the MSW theory, the hierarchy of these tested antimicrobial agents with respect to selecting resistant subpopulations was as follows: cefquinome > ceftiofur > tilmicosin > florfenicol. Cefquinome was the drug that presented the highest risk of selecting resistant mutant among the four antimicrobial agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5103488 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51034882016-11-14 In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin Li, Yafei Zhang, Yanan Ding, Huanzhong Mei, Xian Liu, Wei Zeng, Jiaxiong Zeng, Zhenling BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is an alternative pharmacodynamic parameter that has been used to measure antimicrobial activity and represents the propensities of antimicrobial agents to select resistant mutants. The concentration range between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC is defined as mutant selection window (MSW). The MPC and MSW parameters represent the ability of antimicrobial agents to inhibit the bacterial mutants selected. This study was conducted to determine the MIC and MPC values of four antimicrobials including ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin against 105 Riemerella anatipestifer isolates. RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) values of clinical isolates tested in our study for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin were 0.063/0.5、0.031/0.5、1/4、1/4 μg/mL, respectively; MPC(50)/ MPC(90) values were 4/64、8/64、4/32、16/256 μg/mL, respectively. These results provided information on the use of these compounds in treating the R. anatipestifer infection; however, additional studies are needed to demonstrate their therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSION: Based on the MSW theory, the hierarchy of these tested antimicrobial agents with respect to selecting resistant subpopulations was as follows: cefquinome > ceftiofur > tilmicosin > florfenicol. Cefquinome was the drug that presented the highest risk of selecting resistant mutant among the four antimicrobial agents. BioMed Central 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5103488/ /pubmed/27829415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0796-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Yafei Zhang, Yanan Ding, Huanzhong Mei, Xian Liu, Wei Zeng, Jiaxiong Zeng, Zhenling In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
title | In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
title_full | In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
title_fullStr | In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
title_short | In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
title_sort | in vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103488/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0796-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liyafei invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin AT zhangyanan invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin AT dinghuanzhong invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin AT meixian invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin AT liuwei invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin AT zengjiaxiong invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin AT zengzhenling invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin |