Cargando…

In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin

BACKGROUND: Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is an alternative pharmacodynamic parameter that has been used to measure antimicrobial activity and represents the propensities of antimicrobial agents to select resistant mutants. The concentration range between minimum inhibitory concentration (MI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Yafei, Zhang, Yanan, Ding, Huanzhong, Mei, Xian, Liu, Wei, Zeng, Jiaxiong, Zeng, Zhenling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0796-3
_version_ 1782466602851106816
author Li, Yafei
Zhang, Yanan
Ding, Huanzhong
Mei, Xian
Liu, Wei
Zeng, Jiaxiong
Zeng, Zhenling
author_facet Li, Yafei
Zhang, Yanan
Ding, Huanzhong
Mei, Xian
Liu, Wei
Zeng, Jiaxiong
Zeng, Zhenling
author_sort Li, Yafei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is an alternative pharmacodynamic parameter that has been used to measure antimicrobial activity and represents the propensities of antimicrobial agents to select resistant mutants. The concentration range between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC is defined as mutant selection window (MSW). The MPC and MSW parameters represent the ability of antimicrobial agents to inhibit the bacterial mutants selected. This study was conducted to determine the MIC and MPC values of four antimicrobials including ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin against 105 Riemerella anatipestifer isolates. RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) values of clinical isolates tested in our study for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin were 0.063/0.5、0.031/0.5、1/4、1/4 μg/mL, respectively; MPC(50)/ MPC(90) values were 4/64、8/64、4/32、16/256 μg/mL, respectively. These results provided information on the use of these compounds in treating the R. anatipestifer infection; however, additional studies are needed to demonstrate their therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSION: Based on the MSW theory, the hierarchy of these tested antimicrobial agents with respect to selecting resistant subpopulations was as follows: cefquinome > ceftiofur > tilmicosin > florfenicol. Cefquinome was the drug that presented the highest risk of selecting resistant mutant among the four antimicrobial agents.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51034882016-11-14 In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin Li, Yafei Zhang, Yanan Ding, Huanzhong Mei, Xian Liu, Wei Zeng, Jiaxiong Zeng, Zhenling BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Mutant prevention concentration (MPC) is an alternative pharmacodynamic parameter that has been used to measure antimicrobial activity and represents the propensities of antimicrobial agents to select resistant mutants. The concentration range between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and MPC is defined as mutant selection window (MSW). The MPC and MSW parameters represent the ability of antimicrobial agents to inhibit the bacterial mutants selected. This study was conducted to determine the MIC and MPC values of four antimicrobials including ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin against 105 Riemerella anatipestifer isolates. RESULTS: The MIC(50)/MIC(90) values of clinical isolates tested in our study for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol and tilmicosin were 0.063/0.5、0.031/0.5、1/4、1/4 μg/mL, respectively; MPC(50)/ MPC(90) values were 4/64、8/64、4/32、16/256 μg/mL, respectively. These results provided information on the use of these compounds in treating the R. anatipestifer infection; however, additional studies are needed to demonstrate their therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSION: Based on the MSW theory, the hierarchy of these tested antimicrobial agents with respect to selecting resistant subpopulations was as follows: cefquinome > ceftiofur > tilmicosin > florfenicol. Cefquinome was the drug that presented the highest risk of selecting resistant mutant among the four antimicrobial agents. BioMed Central 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5103488/ /pubmed/27829415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0796-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Yafei
Zhang, Yanan
Ding, Huanzhong
Mei, Xian
Liu, Wei
Zeng, Jiaxiong
Zeng, Zhenling
In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
title In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
title_full In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
title_fullStr In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
title_full_unstemmed In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
title_short In vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against Riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
title_sort in vitro susceptibility of four antimicrobials against riemerella anatipestifer isolates: a comparison of minimum inhibitory concentrations and mutant prevention concentrations for ceftiofur, cefquinome, florfenicol, and tilmicosin
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0796-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liyafei invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin
AT zhangyanan invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin
AT dinghuanzhong invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin
AT meixian invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin
AT liuwei invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin
AT zengjiaxiong invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin
AT zengzhenling invitrosusceptibilityoffourantimicrobialsagainstriemerellaanatipestiferisolatesacomparisonofminimuminhibitoryconcentrationsandmutantpreventionconcentrationsforceftiofurcefquinomeflorfenicolandtilmicosin