Cargando…

Is the glutamine story over?

Glutamine has been launched as a conditionally indispensible amino acid for the critically ill. Supplementation has been recommended in guidelines from international societies. Although data have been presented pointing out that glutamine supplementation may not be for everybody, recommendations for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smedberg, Marie, Wernerman, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1531-y
_version_ 1782466606292533248
author Smedberg, Marie
Wernerman, Jan
author_facet Smedberg, Marie
Wernerman, Jan
author_sort Smedberg, Marie
collection PubMed
description Glutamine has been launched as a conditionally indispensible amino acid for the critically ill. Supplementation has been recommended in guidelines from international societies. Although data have been presented pointing out that glutamine supplementation may not be for everybody, recommendations for treatments and design of study protocols have included all critically ill patients. Results from more recent studies and meta-analyses indicate that indiscriminate use of glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients may actually cause harm rather than beneficial effects. This viewpoint sorts out arguments of controversy in the glutamine story.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51035042016-11-14 Is the glutamine story over? Smedberg, Marie Wernerman, Jan Crit Care Viewpoint Glutamine has been launched as a conditionally indispensible amino acid for the critically ill. Supplementation has been recommended in guidelines from international societies. Although data have been presented pointing out that glutamine supplementation may not be for everybody, recommendations for treatments and design of study protocols have included all critically ill patients. Results from more recent studies and meta-analyses indicate that indiscriminate use of glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients may actually cause harm rather than beneficial effects. This viewpoint sorts out arguments of controversy in the glutamine story. BioMed Central 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5103504/ /pubmed/27829456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1531-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Viewpoint
Smedberg, Marie
Wernerman, Jan
Is the glutamine story over?
title Is the glutamine story over?
title_full Is the glutamine story over?
title_fullStr Is the glutamine story over?
title_full_unstemmed Is the glutamine story over?
title_short Is the glutamine story over?
title_sort is the glutamine story over?
topic Viewpoint
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1531-y
work_keys_str_mv AT smedbergmarie istheglutaminestoryover
AT wernermanjan istheglutaminestoryover