Cargando…

Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision

BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith, Senior, Hugh Edgar, Bibo, Michael Peter, Makoni, Blessing, Young, Sharleen Nicole, Rosenberg, John Patrick, Yates, Patsy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0163-y
_version_ 1782466626639101952
author Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith
Senior, Hugh Edgar
Bibo, Michael Peter
Makoni, Blessing
Young, Sharleen Nicole
Rosenberg, John Patrick
Yates, Patsy
author_facet Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith
Senior, Hugh Edgar
Bibo, Michael Peter
Makoni, Blessing
Young, Sharleen Nicole
Rosenberg, John Patrick
Yates, Patsy
author_sort Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidisciplinary case conference (SMCC), could influence patient and health system outcomes. METHODS: Setting – Australian rural district 50 kilometers from the nearest specialist palliative care service. Participants: Adults nearing the end of life from any cause, life expectancy several months. Intervention- NP led assessment, then SMCC as soon as possible after referral. A clinical care plan recorded management plans for current and anticipated problems and who was responsible for each action. Eligible patients had baseline, 1 and 3 month patient-reported assessment of function, quality of life, depression and carer stress, and a clinical record audit. Interviews with key service providers assessed the utility and feasibility of the service. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were referred to the service, forty from the specialist service. Many patients required immediate treatment, prior to both the planned baseline assessment and the planned SMCC (therefore ineligible for enrollment). Only six patients were assessed per protocol, so we amended the protocol. There were 23 case conferences. Reasons for not conducting the case conference included the patient approaching death, or assessed as not having immediate problems. Pain (25 %) and depression (23 %) were the most common symptoms discussed in the case conferences. Ten new advance care plans were initiated, with most patients already having one. The NP or RN made 101 follow-up visits, 169 phone calls, and made 17 referrals to other health professionals. The NP prescribed 24 new medications and altered the dose in nine. There were 14 hospitalisations in the time frame of the project. Participants were satisfied with the service, but the service cost exceeded income from national health insurance alone. CONCLUSIONS: NP-coordinated, GP supported care resulted in prompt initiation of treatment, good follow up, and a care plan where all professionals had named responsibilities. NP coordinated palliative care appears to enable more integrated care and may be effective in reducing hospitalisations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51035922016-11-14 Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith Senior, Hugh Edgar Bibo, Michael Peter Makoni, Blessing Young, Sharleen Nicole Rosenberg, John Patrick Yates, Patsy BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidisciplinary case conference (SMCC), could influence patient and health system outcomes. METHODS: Setting – Australian rural district 50 kilometers from the nearest specialist palliative care service. Participants: Adults nearing the end of life from any cause, life expectancy several months. Intervention- NP led assessment, then SMCC as soon as possible after referral. A clinical care plan recorded management plans for current and anticipated problems and who was responsible for each action. Eligible patients had baseline, 1 and 3 month patient-reported assessment of function, quality of life, depression and carer stress, and a clinical record audit. Interviews with key service providers assessed the utility and feasibility of the service. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were referred to the service, forty from the specialist service. Many patients required immediate treatment, prior to both the planned baseline assessment and the planned SMCC (therefore ineligible for enrollment). Only six patients were assessed per protocol, so we amended the protocol. There were 23 case conferences. Reasons for not conducting the case conference included the patient approaching death, or assessed as not having immediate problems. Pain (25 %) and depression (23 %) were the most common symptoms discussed in the case conferences. Ten new advance care plans were initiated, with most patients already having one. The NP or RN made 101 follow-up visits, 169 phone calls, and made 17 referrals to other health professionals. The NP prescribed 24 new medications and altered the dose in nine. There were 14 hospitalisations in the time frame of the project. Participants were satisfied with the service, but the service cost exceeded income from national health insurance alone. CONCLUSIONS: NP-coordinated, GP supported care resulted in prompt initiation of treatment, good follow up, and a care plan where all professionals had named responsibilities. NP coordinated palliative care appears to enable more integrated care and may be effective in reducing hospitalisations. BioMed Central 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5103592/ /pubmed/27829425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0163-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith
Senior, Hugh Edgar
Bibo, Michael Peter
Makoni, Blessing
Young, Sharleen Nicole
Rosenberg, John Patrick
Yates, Patsy
Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
title Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
title_full Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
title_fullStr Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
title_short Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
title_sort evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, gp supported rural palliative care provision
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829425
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0163-y
work_keys_str_mv AT mitchellgeoffreykeith evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision
AT seniorhughedgar evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision
AT bibomichaelpeter evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision
AT makoniblessing evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision
AT youngsharleennicole evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision
AT rosenbergjohnpatrick evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision
AT yatespatsy evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision