Cargando…
Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision
BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0163-y |
_version_ | 1782466626639101952 |
---|---|
author | Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith Senior, Hugh Edgar Bibo, Michael Peter Makoni, Blessing Young, Sharleen Nicole Rosenberg, John Patrick Yates, Patsy |
author_facet | Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith Senior, Hugh Edgar Bibo, Michael Peter Makoni, Blessing Young, Sharleen Nicole Rosenberg, John Patrick Yates, Patsy |
author_sort | Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidisciplinary case conference (SMCC), could influence patient and health system outcomes. METHODS: Setting – Australian rural district 50 kilometers from the nearest specialist palliative care service. Participants: Adults nearing the end of life from any cause, life expectancy several months. Intervention- NP led assessment, then SMCC as soon as possible after referral. A clinical care plan recorded management plans for current and anticipated problems and who was responsible for each action. Eligible patients had baseline, 1 and 3 month patient-reported assessment of function, quality of life, depression and carer stress, and a clinical record audit. Interviews with key service providers assessed the utility and feasibility of the service. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were referred to the service, forty from the specialist service. Many patients required immediate treatment, prior to both the planned baseline assessment and the planned SMCC (therefore ineligible for enrollment). Only six patients were assessed per protocol, so we amended the protocol. There were 23 case conferences. Reasons for not conducting the case conference included the patient approaching death, or assessed as not having immediate problems. Pain (25 %) and depression (23 %) were the most common symptoms discussed in the case conferences. Ten new advance care plans were initiated, with most patients already having one. The NP or RN made 101 follow-up visits, 169 phone calls, and made 17 referrals to other health professionals. The NP prescribed 24 new medications and altered the dose in nine. There were 14 hospitalisations in the time frame of the project. Participants were satisfied with the service, but the service cost exceeded income from national health insurance alone. CONCLUSIONS: NP-coordinated, GP supported care resulted in prompt initiation of treatment, good follow up, and a care plan where all professionals had named responsibilities. NP coordinated palliative care appears to enable more integrated care and may be effective in reducing hospitalisations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5103592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51035922016-11-14 Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith Senior, Hugh Edgar Bibo, Michael Peter Makoni, Blessing Young, Sharleen Nicole Rosenberg, John Patrick Yates, Patsy BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Providing end of life care in rural areas is challenging. We evaluated in a pilot whether nurse practitioner (NP)-led care, including clinical care plans negotiated with involved health professionals including the general practitioner(GP), ± patient and/or carer, through a single multidisciplinary case conference (SMCC), could influence patient and health system outcomes. METHODS: Setting – Australian rural district 50 kilometers from the nearest specialist palliative care service. Participants: Adults nearing the end of life from any cause, life expectancy several months. Intervention- NP led assessment, then SMCC as soon as possible after referral. A clinical care plan recorded management plans for current and anticipated problems and who was responsible for each action. Eligible patients had baseline, 1 and 3 month patient-reported assessment of function, quality of life, depression and carer stress, and a clinical record audit. Interviews with key service providers assessed the utility and feasibility of the service. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were referred to the service, forty from the specialist service. Many patients required immediate treatment, prior to both the planned baseline assessment and the planned SMCC (therefore ineligible for enrollment). Only six patients were assessed per protocol, so we amended the protocol. There were 23 case conferences. Reasons for not conducting the case conference included the patient approaching death, or assessed as not having immediate problems. Pain (25 %) and depression (23 %) were the most common symptoms discussed in the case conferences. Ten new advance care plans were initiated, with most patients already having one. The NP or RN made 101 follow-up visits, 169 phone calls, and made 17 referrals to other health professionals. The NP prescribed 24 new medications and altered the dose in nine. There were 14 hospitalisations in the time frame of the project. Participants were satisfied with the service, but the service cost exceeded income from national health insurance alone. CONCLUSIONS: NP-coordinated, GP supported care resulted in prompt initiation of treatment, good follow up, and a care plan where all professionals had named responsibilities. NP coordinated palliative care appears to enable more integrated care and may be effective in reducing hospitalisations. BioMed Central 2016-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5103592/ /pubmed/27829425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0163-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mitchell, Geoffrey Keith Senior, Hugh Edgar Bibo, Michael Peter Makoni, Blessing Young, Sharleen Nicole Rosenberg, John Patrick Yates, Patsy Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision |
title | Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision |
title_full | Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision |
title_short | Evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, GP supported rural palliative care provision |
title_sort | evaluation of a pilot of nurse practitioner led, gp supported rural palliative care provision |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27829425 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-016-0163-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitchellgeoffreykeith evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision AT seniorhughedgar evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision AT bibomichaelpeter evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision AT makoniblessing evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision AT youngsharleennicole evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision AT rosenbergjohnpatrick evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision AT yatespatsy evaluationofapilotofnursepractitionerledgpsupportedruralpalliativecareprovision |