Cargando…

Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography

Overnight polysomnography (PSG) is currently the gold standard for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, it is time-consuming, expensive and uncomfortable for the patient. A micromovement sensitive mattress (MSM) sleep-monitoring system was developed as an alternative to PSG, however, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Lili, Xu, Huajun, Guan, Jian, Yi, Hongliang, Wu, Hongmin, Yin, Shankai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3721
_version_ 1782466641514201088
author Meng, Lili
Xu, Huajun
Guan, Jian
Yi, Hongliang
Wu, Hongmin
Yin, Shankai
author_facet Meng, Lili
Xu, Huajun
Guan, Jian
Yi, Hongliang
Wu, Hongmin
Yin, Shankai
author_sort Meng, Lili
collection PubMed
description Overnight polysomnography (PSG) is currently the gold standard for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, it is time-consuming, expensive and uncomfortable for the patient. A micromovement sensitive mattress (MSM) sleep-monitoring system was developed as an alternative to PSG, however, there has yet to be a study verifying the accuracy of diagnosing OSA with this device. Therefore, the present study assessed the validity of the MSM sleep-monitoring system. Chinese Han participants who were suspected of having OSA were recruited between June 2013 and June 2014. The MSM sleep-monitoring system and PSG were utilized simultaneously overnight on each subject. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was measured by the MSM sleep-monitoring system (AHI(MSM)) and compared with that determined by PSG (AHI(PSG)), revealing a significant correlation between the two values (r=0.97, P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots also indicated good agreement (97%) between MSM and PSG. Using an AHI(PSG) cut-off of ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30 events/h, the sensitivity (specificity) of detecting an AHI(MSM) of ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 events/h were 94.9 (100%), 89.9 (96.9%) and 90.3% (94.9%), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which were used to differentiate an AHI(PSG) of ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30 events/h in clinically diagnosed OSA, were 0.984, 0.982 and 0.980, respectively. Thus, the MSM sleeping system may accurately diagnose OSA in the Chinese Han population. Further community-based studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm the validity of this MSM sleeping system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5103728
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51037282016-11-23 Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography Meng, Lili Xu, Huajun Guan, Jian Yi, Hongliang Wu, Hongmin Yin, Shankai Exp Ther Med Articles Overnight polysomnography (PSG) is currently the gold standard for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA); however, it is time-consuming, expensive and uncomfortable for the patient. A micromovement sensitive mattress (MSM) sleep-monitoring system was developed as an alternative to PSG, however, there has yet to be a study verifying the accuracy of diagnosing OSA with this device. Therefore, the present study assessed the validity of the MSM sleep-monitoring system. Chinese Han participants who were suspected of having OSA were recruited between June 2013 and June 2014. The MSM sleep-monitoring system and PSG were utilized simultaneously overnight on each subject. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was measured by the MSM sleep-monitoring system (AHI(MSM)) and compared with that determined by PSG (AHI(PSG)), revealing a significant correlation between the two values (r=0.97, P<0.001). Bland-Altman plots also indicated good agreement (97%) between MSM and PSG. Using an AHI(PSG) cut-off of ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30 events/h, the sensitivity (specificity) of detecting an AHI(MSM) of ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 events/h were 94.9 (100%), 89.9 (96.9%) and 90.3% (94.9%), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, which were used to differentiate an AHI(PSG) of ≥5, ≥15 and ≥30 events/h in clinically diagnosed OSA, were 0.984, 0.982 and 0.980, respectively. Thus, the MSM sleeping system may accurately diagnose OSA in the Chinese Han population. Further community-based studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to confirm the validity of this MSM sleeping system. D.A. Spandidos 2016-11 2016-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5103728/ /pubmed/27882098 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3721 Text en Copyright: © Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Meng, Lili
Xu, Huajun
Guan, Jian
Yi, Hongliang
Wu, Hongmin
Yin, Shankai
Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography
title Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography
title_full Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography
title_fullStr Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography
title_short Validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: A comparison with polysomnography
title_sort validation of a novel sleep-monitoring system for diagnosing obstructive sleep apnea: a comparison with polysomnography
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103728/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27882098
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3721
work_keys_str_mv AT menglili validationofanovelsleepmonitoringsystemfordiagnosingobstructivesleepapneaacomparisonwithpolysomnography
AT xuhuajun validationofanovelsleepmonitoringsystemfordiagnosingobstructivesleepapneaacomparisonwithpolysomnography
AT guanjian validationofanovelsleepmonitoringsystemfordiagnosingobstructivesleepapneaacomparisonwithpolysomnography
AT yihongliang validationofanovelsleepmonitoringsystemfordiagnosingobstructivesleepapneaacomparisonwithpolysomnography
AT wuhongmin validationofanovelsleepmonitoringsystemfordiagnosingobstructivesleepapneaacomparisonwithpolysomnography
AT yinshankai validationofanovelsleepmonitoringsystemfordiagnosingobstructivesleepapneaacomparisonwithpolysomnography