Cargando…
Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation by mitochondria is an incompletely understood eukaryotic process. I proposed a kinetic model [BioEssays (2011) 33, 88–94] in which the ratio between electrons entering the respiratory chain via FADH(2) or NADH (the F/N ratio) is a crucial determinant of ROS fo...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Portland Press Ltd.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160647 |
_version_ | 1782466658405711872 |
---|---|
author | Speijer, Dave |
author_facet | Speijer, Dave |
author_sort | Speijer, Dave |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation by mitochondria is an incompletely understood eukaryotic process. I proposed a kinetic model [BioEssays (2011) 33, 88–94] in which the ratio between electrons entering the respiratory chain via FADH(2) or NADH (the F/N ratio) is a crucial determinant of ROS formation. During glucose breakdown, the ratio is low, while during fatty acid breakdown, the ratio is high (the longer the fatty acid, the higher is the ratio), leading to higher ROS levels. Thus, breakdown of (very-long-chain) fatty acids should occur without generating extra FADH(2) in mitochondria. This explains peroxisome evolution. A potential ROS increase could also explain the absence of fatty acid oxidation in long-lived cells (neurons) as well as other eukaryotic adaptations, such as dynamic supercomplex formation. Effective combinations of metabolic pathways from the host and the endosymbiont (mitochondrion) allowed larger varieties of substrates (with different F/N ratios) to be oxidized, but high F/N ratios increase ROS formation. This might have led to carnitine shuttles, uncoupling proteins, and multiple antioxidant mechanisms, especially linked to fatty acid oxidation [BioEssays (2014) 36, 634–643]. Recent data regarding peroxisome evolution and their relationships with mitochondria, ROS formation by Complex I during ischaemia/reperfusion injury, and supercomplex formation adjustment to F/N ratios strongly support the model. I will further discuss the model in the light of experimental findings regarding mitochondrial ROS formation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5103874 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Portland Press Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51038742016-12-01 Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution Speijer, Dave Biochem J Review Articles Reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation by mitochondria is an incompletely understood eukaryotic process. I proposed a kinetic model [BioEssays (2011) 33, 88–94] in which the ratio between electrons entering the respiratory chain via FADH(2) or NADH (the F/N ratio) is a crucial determinant of ROS formation. During glucose breakdown, the ratio is low, while during fatty acid breakdown, the ratio is high (the longer the fatty acid, the higher is the ratio), leading to higher ROS levels. Thus, breakdown of (very-long-chain) fatty acids should occur without generating extra FADH(2) in mitochondria. This explains peroxisome evolution. A potential ROS increase could also explain the absence of fatty acid oxidation in long-lived cells (neurons) as well as other eukaryotic adaptations, such as dynamic supercomplex formation. Effective combinations of metabolic pathways from the host and the endosymbiont (mitochondrion) allowed larger varieties of substrates (with different F/N ratios) to be oxidized, but high F/N ratios increase ROS formation. This might have led to carnitine shuttles, uncoupling proteins, and multiple antioxidant mechanisms, especially linked to fatty acid oxidation [BioEssays (2014) 36, 634–643]. Recent data regarding peroxisome evolution and their relationships with mitochondria, ROS formation by Complex I during ischaemia/reperfusion injury, and supercomplex formation adjustment to F/N ratios strongly support the model. I will further discuss the model in the light of experimental findings regarding mitochondrial ROS formation. Portland Press Ltd. 2016-11-15 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5103874/ /pubmed/27834740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160647 Text en © 2016 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Speijer, Dave Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
title | Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
title_full | Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
title_fullStr | Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
title_short | Being right on Q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
title_sort | being right on q: shaping eukaryotic evolution |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5103874/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27834740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160647 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT speijerdave beingrightonqshapingeukaryoticevolution |