Cargando…

The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise

The growth in scientific production may threaten the capacity for the scientific community to handle the ever-increasing demand for peer review of scientific publications. There is little evidence regarding the sustainability of the peer-review system and how the scientific community copes with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Kovanis, Michail, Porcher, Raphaël, Ravaud, Philippe, Trinquart, Ludovic
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166387

Ejemplares similares

Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication
por: Kovanis, Michail, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bruce, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Automatic classification of registered clinical trials towards the Global Burden of Diseases taxonomy of diseases and injuries
por: Atal, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Differential Globalization of Industry- and Non-Industry–Sponsored Clinical Trials
por: Atal, Ignacio, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Impact of Reporting Bias in Network Meta-Analysis of Antidepressant Placebo-Controlled Trials
por: Trinquart, Ludovic, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Adjustment for reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant trials
por: Trinquart, Ludovic, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Live cumulative network meta-analysis: protocol for second-line treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor
por: Créquit, Perrine, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study
por: Dechartres, Agnes, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of Treatment Effect Estimates for Pharmacological Randomized Controlled Trials Enrolling Older Adults Only and Those including Adults: A Meta-Epidemiological Study
por: Seegers, Valérie, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Meta-Analysis of a Complex Network of Non-Pharmacological Interventions: The Example of Femoral Neck Fracture
por: Mosseri, Jonathan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer
por: Créquit, Perrine, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

A test for reporting bias in trial networks: simulation and case studies
por: Trinquart, Ludovic, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Risk of bias in observational studies using routinely collected data of comparative effectiveness research: a meta-research study
por: Nguyen, Van Thu, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

What is considered as global health scholarship? A meta-knowledge analysis of global health journals and definitions
por: Abdalla, Salma M, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Respective Contribution of Chronic Conditions to Disability in France: Results from the National Disability-Health Survey
por: Palazzo, Clémence, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Blockchain protocols in clinical trials: Transparency and traceability of consent
por: Benchoufi, Mehdi, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers
por: Song, Eunhye, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
por: Speich, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Impact of evergreening on patients and health insurance: a meta analysis and reimbursement cost analysis of citalopram/escitalopram antidepressants
por: Alkhafaji, Ali A, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Underrepresentation of Elderly People in Randomised Controlled Trials. The Example of Trials of 4 Widely Prescribed Drugs
por: Konrat, Cécile, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
por: Bafeta, Aïda, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The most important tasks for peer reviewers evaluating a randomized controlled trial are not congruent with the tasks most often requested by journal editors
por: Chauvin, Anthony, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Course of post COVID-19 disease symptoms over time in the ComPaRe long COVID prospective e-cohort
por: Tran, Viet-Thi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Imbalance in Individual Researcher's Peer Review Activities Quantified for Four British Ecological Society Journals, 2003-2010
por: Petchey, Owen L., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
por: Créquit, Perrine, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
Publicado: (2013)

A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Extensions of the probabilistic ranking metrics of competing treatments in network meta‐analysis to reflect clinically important relative differences on many outcomes
por: Mavridis, Dimitris, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Trajectories of the evolution of post-COVID-19 condition, up to two years after symptoms onset
por: Servier, Clemence, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Solving the initial problems involved in the writing of a biomedical paper for publication in a peer-review journal
por: John, M
Publicado: (2009)

Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities
por: Ho, Roger Chun-Man, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

A scoping review protocol on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Peer Review in Law Journals
por: Stojanovski, Jadranka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Influence of Anti-Infective Periodontal Treatment on C-Reactive Protein: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Demmer, Ryan T., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_8tgaoka10sa7bd529ojkmf9bfs