Cargando…
Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) appears to be a promising, rapid, non-invasive bedside tool for identification of elevated intra-cranial pressure. With improvements in ultrasound technology, machines are becoming smaller; however, it is unclear if these ultra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0053-9 |
_version_ | 1782466767942057984 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. Zeiler, Frederick A. Unger, Bertram Hansen, Gregory Karakitsos, Dimitrios Gillman, Lawrence M. |
author_facet | Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. Zeiler, Frederick A. Unger, Bertram Hansen, Gregory Karakitsos, Dimitrios Gillman, Lawrence M. |
author_sort | Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) appears to be a promising, rapid, non-invasive bedside tool for identification of elevated intra-cranial pressure. With improvements in ultrasound technology, machines are becoming smaller; however, it is unclear if these ultra-portable handheld units have the resolution to make these measurements precisely. In this study, we estimate the accuracy of ONSD measurement in a pocket-sized ultrasound unit. METHODS: Utilizing a locally developed, previously validated model of the eye, ONSD was measured by two expert observers, three times with two machines and on five models with different optic nerve sheath sizes. A pocket ultrasound (Vscan, GE Healthcare) and a standard portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, SonoSite) were used to measure the models. Data was analyzed by Bland–Altman plot and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ICC between raters for the SonoSite was 0.878, and for the Vscan was 0.826. The between-machine agreement ICC was 0.752. Bland–Altman agreement analysis between the two ultrasound methods showed an even spread across the range of sheath sizes, and that the Vscan tended to read on average 0.33 mm higher than the SonoSite for each measurement, with a standard deviation of 0.65 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate ONSD measurement may be possible utilizing pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound devices despite their small screen size, lower resolution, and lower probe frequencies. Further study in human subjects is warranted for all newer handheld ultrasound models as they become available on the market. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5104698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51046982016-12-07 Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. Zeiler, Frederick A. Unger, Bertram Hansen, Gregory Karakitsos, Dimitrios Gillman, Lawrence M. Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) appears to be a promising, rapid, non-invasive bedside tool for identification of elevated intra-cranial pressure. With improvements in ultrasound technology, machines are becoming smaller; however, it is unclear if these ultra-portable handheld units have the resolution to make these measurements precisely. In this study, we estimate the accuracy of ONSD measurement in a pocket-sized ultrasound unit. METHODS: Utilizing a locally developed, previously validated model of the eye, ONSD was measured by two expert observers, three times with two machines and on five models with different optic nerve sheath sizes. A pocket ultrasound (Vscan, GE Healthcare) and a standard portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, SonoSite) were used to measure the models. Data was analyzed by Bland–Altman plot and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ICC between raters for the SonoSite was 0.878, and for the Vscan was 0.826. The between-machine agreement ICC was 0.752. Bland–Altman agreement analysis between the two ultrasound methods showed an even spread across the range of sheath sizes, and that the Vscan tended to read on average 0.33 mm higher than the SonoSite for each measurement, with a standard deviation of 0.65 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate ONSD measurement may be possible utilizing pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound devices despite their small screen size, lower resolution, and lower probe frequencies. Further study in human subjects is warranted for all newer handheld ultrasound models as they become available on the market. Springer Milan 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5104698/ /pubmed/27832503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0053-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. Zeiler, Frederick A. Unger, Bertram Hansen, Gregory Karakitsos, Dimitrios Gillman, Lawrence M. Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
title | Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
title_full | Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
title_fullStr | Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
title_short | Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
title_sort | estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0053-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsongarrettgrj estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel AT zeilerfredericka estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel AT ungerbertram estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel AT hansengregory estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel AT karakitsosdimitrios estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel AT gillmanlawrencem estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel |