Cargando…

Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) appears to be a promising, rapid, non-invasive bedside tool for identification of elevated intra-cranial pressure. With improvements in ultrasound technology, machines are becoming smaller; however, it is unclear if these ultra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Garrett G. R. J., Zeiler, Frederick A., Unger, Bertram, Hansen, Gregory, Karakitsos, Dimitrios, Gillman, Lawrence M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0053-9
_version_ 1782466767942057984
author Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Unger, Bertram
Hansen, Gregory
Karakitsos, Dimitrios
Gillman, Lawrence M.
author_facet Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Unger, Bertram
Hansen, Gregory
Karakitsos, Dimitrios
Gillman, Lawrence M.
author_sort Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) appears to be a promising, rapid, non-invasive bedside tool for identification of elevated intra-cranial pressure. With improvements in ultrasound technology, machines are becoming smaller; however, it is unclear if these ultra-portable handheld units have the resolution to make these measurements precisely. In this study, we estimate the accuracy of ONSD measurement in a pocket-sized ultrasound unit. METHODS: Utilizing a locally developed, previously validated model of the eye, ONSD was measured by two expert observers, three times with two machines and on five models with different optic nerve sheath sizes. A pocket ultrasound (Vscan, GE Healthcare) and a standard portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, SonoSite) were used to measure the models. Data was analyzed by Bland–Altman plot and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ICC between raters for the SonoSite was 0.878, and for the Vscan was 0.826. The between-machine agreement ICC was 0.752. Bland–Altman agreement analysis between the two ultrasound methods showed an even spread across the range of sheath sizes, and that the Vscan tended to read on average 0.33 mm higher than the SonoSite for each measurement, with a standard deviation of 0.65 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate ONSD measurement may be possible utilizing pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound devices despite their small screen size, lower resolution, and lower probe frequencies. Further study in human subjects is warranted for all newer handheld ultrasound models as they become available on the market.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5104698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51046982016-12-07 Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model Johnson, Garrett G. R. J. Zeiler, Frederick A. Unger, Bertram Hansen, Gregory Karakitsos, Dimitrios Gillman, Lawrence M. Crit Ultrasound J Original Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) appears to be a promising, rapid, non-invasive bedside tool for identification of elevated intra-cranial pressure. With improvements in ultrasound technology, machines are becoming smaller; however, it is unclear if these ultra-portable handheld units have the resolution to make these measurements precisely. In this study, we estimate the accuracy of ONSD measurement in a pocket-sized ultrasound unit. METHODS: Utilizing a locally developed, previously validated model of the eye, ONSD was measured by two expert observers, three times with two machines and on five models with different optic nerve sheath sizes. A pocket ultrasound (Vscan, GE Healthcare) and a standard portable ultrasound (M-Turbo, SonoSite) were used to measure the models. Data was analyzed by Bland–Altman plot and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The ICC between raters for the SonoSite was 0.878, and for the Vscan was 0.826. The between-machine agreement ICC was 0.752. Bland–Altman agreement analysis between the two ultrasound methods showed an even spread across the range of sheath sizes, and that the Vscan tended to read on average 0.33 mm higher than the SonoSite for each measurement, with a standard deviation of 0.65 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate ONSD measurement may be possible utilizing pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound devices despite their small screen size, lower resolution, and lower probe frequencies. Further study in human subjects is warranted for all newer handheld ultrasound models as they become available on the market. Springer Milan 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5104698/ /pubmed/27832503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0053-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Johnson, Garrett G. R. J.
Zeiler, Frederick A.
Unger, Bertram
Hansen, Gregory
Karakitsos, Dimitrios
Gillman, Lawrence M.
Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
title Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
title_full Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
title_fullStr Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
title_full_unstemmed Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
title_short Estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
title_sort estimating the accuracy of optic nerve sheath diameter measurement using a pocket-sized, handheld ultrasound on a simulation model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832503
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13089-016-0053-9
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsongarrettgrj estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel
AT zeilerfredericka estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel
AT ungerbertram estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel
AT hansengregory estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel
AT karakitsosdimitrios estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel
AT gillmanlawrencem estimatingtheaccuracyofopticnervesheathdiametermeasurementusingapocketsizedhandheldultrasoundonasimulationmodel