Cargando…
Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
BACKGROUND: To investigate tumour biomarker status and efficacy of first-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS: 154 patients received first-line panitumumab + FOLFIRI every 14 days. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Data were analysed by tumo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.343 |
_version_ | 1782466812698427392 |
---|---|
author | Karthaus, Meinolf Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter Mineur, Laurent Letocha, Henry Greil, Richard Thaler, Josef Fernebro, Eva Oliner, Kelly S Boedigheimer, Michael Twomey, Brian Zhang, Ying Demonty, Gaston Köhne, Claus-Henning |
author_facet | Karthaus, Meinolf Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter Mineur, Laurent Letocha, Henry Greil, Richard Thaler, Josef Fernebro, Eva Oliner, Kelly S Boedigheimer, Michael Twomey, Brian Zhang, Ying Demonty, Gaston Köhne, Claus-Henning |
author_sort | Karthaus, Meinolf |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To investigate tumour biomarker status and efficacy of first-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS: 154 patients received first-line panitumumab + FOLFIRI every 14 days. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Data were analysed by tumour RAS (KRAS/NRAS) and BRAF status, and baseline amphiregulin (AREG) expression. RESULTS: Objective responses occurred more frequently in RAS wild type (WT) (59%) vs RAS mutant (MT) (41%) mCRC and in RAS WT/BRAF WT (68%) vs RAS or BRAF MT (37%) disease. Median response duration was longer in RAS WT (13.0 months) vs RAS MT (5.8 months) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.16). Median progression-free survival was longer in RAS WT vs MT (11.2 vs 7.3 months; HR, 0.37) and was also longer in RAS WT/BRAF WT vs RAS or BRAF MT (13.2 vs 6.9 months; HR, 0.25). Incidence of adverse events was similar regardless of RAS/BRAF status, and no new safety signals were noted. Among patients with RAS WT tumours, ORR was 67% with high AREG expression and 38% with low AREG expression. CONCLUSIONS: First-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI was associated with favourable efficacy in patients with RAS WT and RAS WT/BRAF WT vs MT mCRC tumours and was well tolerated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5104899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51048992016-11-18 Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer Karthaus, Meinolf Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter Mineur, Laurent Letocha, Henry Greil, Richard Thaler, Josef Fernebro, Eva Oliner, Kelly S Boedigheimer, Michael Twomey, Brian Zhang, Ying Demonty, Gaston Köhne, Claus-Henning Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: To investigate tumour biomarker status and efficacy of first-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). METHODS: 154 patients received first-line panitumumab + FOLFIRI every 14 days. Primary end point was objective response rate (ORR). Data were analysed by tumour RAS (KRAS/NRAS) and BRAF status, and baseline amphiregulin (AREG) expression. RESULTS: Objective responses occurred more frequently in RAS wild type (WT) (59%) vs RAS mutant (MT) (41%) mCRC and in RAS WT/BRAF WT (68%) vs RAS or BRAF MT (37%) disease. Median response duration was longer in RAS WT (13.0 months) vs RAS MT (5.8 months) (hazard ratio (HR): 0.16). Median progression-free survival was longer in RAS WT vs MT (11.2 vs 7.3 months; HR, 0.37) and was also longer in RAS WT/BRAF WT vs RAS or BRAF MT (13.2 vs 6.9 months; HR, 0.25). Incidence of adverse events was similar regardless of RAS/BRAF status, and no new safety signals were noted. Among patients with RAS WT tumours, ORR was 67% with high AREG expression and 38% with low AREG expression. CONCLUSIONS: First-line panitumumab+FOLFIRI was associated with favourable efficacy in patients with RAS WT and RAS WT/BRAF WT vs MT mCRC tumours and was well tolerated. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-08 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5104899/ /pubmed/27764839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.343 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Karthaus, Meinolf Hofheinz, Ralf-Dieter Mineur, Laurent Letocha, Henry Greil, Richard Thaler, Josef Fernebro, Eva Oliner, Kelly S Boedigheimer, Michael Twomey, Brian Zhang, Ying Demonty, Gaston Köhne, Claus-Henning Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
title | Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_full | Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_short | Impact of tumour RAS/BRAF status in a first-line study of panitumumab + FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
title_sort | impact of tumour ras/braf status in a first-line study of panitumumab + folfiri in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5104899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karthausmeinolf impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT hofheinzralfdieter impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT mineurlaurent impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT letochahenry impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT greilrichard impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT thalerjosef impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT fernebroeva impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT olinerkellys impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT boedigheimermichael impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT twomeybrian impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT zhangying impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT demontygaston impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer AT kohneclaushenning impactoftumourrasbrafstatusinafirstlinestudyofpanitumumabfolfiriinpatientswithmetastaticcolorectalcancer |