Cargando…

A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region

BACKGROUND: The current study was planned to identify the epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region using neighborhood controls. METHODS: A total of 100 cases of leptospirosis occurred in South Gujarat region during the year 2012 were selected using simple random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Desai, KT, Patel, F, Patel, PB, Nayak, S, Patel, NB, Bansal, RK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27763478
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.188551
_version_ 1782466857281781760
author Desai, KT
Patel, F
Patel, PB
Nayak, S
Patel, NB
Bansal, RK
author_facet Desai, KT
Patel, F
Patel, PB
Nayak, S
Patel, NB
Bansal, RK
author_sort Desai, KT
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The current study was planned to identify the epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region using neighborhood controls. METHODS: A total of 100 cases of leptospirosis occurred in South Gujarat region during the year 2012 were selected using simple random sampling. Three neighbors of the selected cases formed the controls (n = 300). A pretested structured questionnaire was used for data collection and data were analyzed using Epi Info 2007. RESULTS: There was significant association of illiteracy (odds ratio [OR] =1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.14–2.89), working in waterlogged fields during the reference season (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.6–17.9), swimming/bathing in canals, open air defecation practices, storage of cow dung in or surrounding house, residence in the house made up of cow dung walls, households with access of food to rodents, injuries over hands/foot during the endemic season (OR = 3, 95% CI = 1.8–4.8), and history of skin disease during the endemic season (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2–8.5), with leptospirosis. Only 10% of individuals had gumboots for protection. A total of 83 (83%) cases and 240 (80%) controls had taken oral doxycycline chemoprophylaxis (P > 0.05). Cases had taken chemoprophylaxis for a median 4 weeks (range: 1–8) while controls had taken the same for median 8 weeks (range = 1–8) (P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although the commonly established factors appear to be associated with leptospirosis, the role of host factors seems to play a more important role in determining susceptibility to leptospirosis in exposed individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5105206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51052062016-11-18 A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region Desai, KT Patel, F Patel, PB Nayak, S Patel, NB Bansal, RK J Postgrad Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The current study was planned to identify the epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region using neighborhood controls. METHODS: A total of 100 cases of leptospirosis occurred in South Gujarat region during the year 2012 were selected using simple random sampling. Three neighbors of the selected cases formed the controls (n = 300). A pretested structured questionnaire was used for data collection and data were analyzed using Epi Info 2007. RESULTS: There was significant association of illiteracy (odds ratio [OR] =1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.14–2.89), working in waterlogged fields during the reference season (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.6–17.9), swimming/bathing in canals, open air defecation practices, storage of cow dung in or surrounding house, residence in the house made up of cow dung walls, households with access of food to rodents, injuries over hands/foot during the endemic season (OR = 3, 95% CI = 1.8–4.8), and history of skin disease during the endemic season (OR = 4.2, 95% CI = 2–8.5), with leptospirosis. Only 10% of individuals had gumboots for protection. A total of 83 (83%) cases and 240 (80%) controls had taken oral doxycycline chemoprophylaxis (P > 0.05). Cases had taken chemoprophylaxis for a median 4 weeks (range: 1–8) while controls had taken the same for median 8 weeks (range = 1–8) (P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Although the commonly established factors appear to be associated with leptospirosis, the role of host factors seems to play a more important role in determining susceptibility to leptospirosis in exposed individuals. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5105206/ /pubmed/27763478 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.188551 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Postgraduate Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Desai, KT
Patel, F
Patel, PB
Nayak, S
Patel, NB
Bansal, RK
A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region
title A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region
title_full A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region
title_fullStr A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region
title_full_unstemmed A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region
title_short A case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in South Gujarat region
title_sort case–control study of epidemiological factors associated with leptospirosis in south gujarat region
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27763478
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.188551
work_keys_str_mv AT desaikt acasecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT patelf acasecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT patelpb acasecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT nayaks acasecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT patelnb acasecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT bansalrk acasecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT desaikt casecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT patelf casecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT patelpb casecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT nayaks casecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT patelnb casecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion
AT bansalrk casecontrolstudyofepidemiologicalfactorsassociatedwithleptospirosisinsouthgujaratregion