Cargando…

Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms

BACKGROUND: Accurate genomic analyses are predicated upon access to accurate genotype input data. The objective of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of genotype data that are generated from the same genotype platform and from different genotyping platforms. METHODS: Genotypes based on 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berry, Donagh P., O’Brien, Aine, Wall, Eamonn, McDermott, Kevin, Randles, Shane, Flynn, Paul, Park, Stephen, Grose, Jenny, Weld, Rebecca, McHugh, Noirin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0267-0
_version_ 1782466869787099136
author Berry, Donagh P.
O’Brien, Aine
Wall, Eamonn
McDermott, Kevin
Randles, Shane
Flynn, Paul
Park, Stephen
Grose, Jenny
Weld, Rebecca
McHugh, Noirin
author_facet Berry, Donagh P.
O’Brien, Aine
Wall, Eamonn
McDermott, Kevin
Randles, Shane
Flynn, Paul
Park, Stephen
Grose, Jenny
Weld, Rebecca
McHugh, Noirin
author_sort Berry, Donagh P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate genomic analyses are predicated upon access to accurate genotype input data. The objective of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of genotype data that are generated from the same genotype platform and from different genotyping platforms. METHODS: Genotypes based on 51,121 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for 84 animals that were each genotyped on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms and for another 25 animals that were each genotyped twice on the same Illumina platform were compared. Genotypes based on 11,323 SNPs for an additional 21 animals that were genotyped on two different Illumina platforms by two different service providers were also compared. Reproducibility of the results was measured as the correlation between allele counts and as genotype and allele concordance rates. RESULTS: A mean within-animal correlation of 0.9996 was found between allele counts in the 25 duplicate samples that were genotyped on the same Illumina platform and varied from 0.9963 to 1.0000 per animal. The mean (minimum, maximum) genotype and allele concordance rates per animal between the 25 duplicate samples were equal to 0.9996 (0.9968, 1.0000) and 0.9993 (0.9937, 1.0000), respectively. The concordance rate between the two different Illumina platforms was also near 1. A mean within-animal correlation of 0.9738 was found between genotypes that were generated on the Illumina and Affymetrix platforms and varied from 0.9505 to 0.9812 per animal. The mean (minimum, maximum) within-animal genotype and allele concordance rates between the Illumina and Affymetrix platforms were equal to 0.9711 (0.9418, 0.9798) and 0.9845 (0.9695, 0.9889), respectively. The genotype concordance rate across all genotypes increased from 0.9711 to 0.9949 when the SNPs used were restricted to those with three high-resolution genotype clusters which represented 75.2% of the called genotypes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest that, regardless of the genotype platform or service provider, high genotype concordance rates are achieved especially if they are restricted to high-quality extracted DNA and SNPs that result in high-quality genotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5105264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51052642016-11-14 Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms Berry, Donagh P. O’Brien, Aine Wall, Eamonn McDermott, Kevin Randles, Shane Flynn, Paul Park, Stephen Grose, Jenny Weld, Rebecca McHugh, Noirin Genet Sel Evol Short Communication BACKGROUND: Accurate genomic analyses are predicated upon access to accurate genotype input data. The objective of this study was to quantify the reproducibility of genotype data that are generated from the same genotype platform and from different genotyping platforms. METHODS: Genotypes based on 51,121 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for 84 animals that were each genotyped on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms and for another 25 animals that were each genotyped twice on the same Illumina platform were compared. Genotypes based on 11,323 SNPs for an additional 21 animals that were genotyped on two different Illumina platforms by two different service providers were also compared. Reproducibility of the results was measured as the correlation between allele counts and as genotype and allele concordance rates. RESULTS: A mean within-animal correlation of 0.9996 was found between allele counts in the 25 duplicate samples that were genotyped on the same Illumina platform and varied from 0.9963 to 1.0000 per animal. The mean (minimum, maximum) genotype and allele concordance rates per animal between the 25 duplicate samples were equal to 0.9996 (0.9968, 1.0000) and 0.9993 (0.9937, 1.0000), respectively. The concordance rate between the two different Illumina platforms was also near 1. A mean within-animal correlation of 0.9738 was found between genotypes that were generated on the Illumina and Affymetrix platforms and varied from 0.9505 to 0.9812 per animal. The mean (minimum, maximum) within-animal genotype and allele concordance rates between the Illumina and Affymetrix platforms were equal to 0.9711 (0.9418, 0.9798) and 0.9845 (0.9695, 0.9889), respectively. The genotype concordance rate across all genotypes increased from 0.9711 to 0.9949 when the SNPs used were restricted to those with three high-resolution genotype clusters which represented 75.2% of the called genotypes. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest that, regardless of the genotype platform or service provider, high genotype concordance rates are achieved especially if they are restricted to high-quality extracted DNA and SNPs that result in high-quality genotypes. BioMed Central 2016-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5105264/ /pubmed/27832740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0267-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Communication
Berry, Donagh P.
O’Brien, Aine
Wall, Eamonn
McDermott, Kevin
Randles, Shane
Flynn, Paul
Park, Stephen
Grose, Jenny
Weld, Rebecca
McHugh, Noirin
Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms
title Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms
title_full Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms
title_fullStr Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms
title_full_unstemmed Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms
title_short Inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on Illumina and Affymetrix platforms
title_sort inter- and intra-reproducibility of genotypes from sheep technical replicates on illumina and affymetrix platforms
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27832740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0267-0
work_keys_str_mv AT berrydonaghp interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT obrienaine interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT walleamonn interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT mcdermottkevin interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT randlesshane interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT flynnpaul interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT parkstephen interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT grosejenny interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT weldrebecca interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms
AT mchughnoirin interandintrareproducibilityofgenotypesfromsheeptechnicalreplicatesonilluminaandaffymetrixplatforms